Kamala Harris to Tax 'Unrealized Gains'

the Harris WS campaign has proposed two new tax policies that will drastically affect everyone in the United States unless of course you're an Elites but eventually Elites face their own demise as these tax policies that are really targeted towards going after the middle class these eventually trickle up and of course they trickle down so what you have is a proposed 25% uh tax on unrealized gains and then you have an increase of 37% to 44.6% on capital gain now I'll go into both of these unless I go too far into the 25% tax and that covers too much time uh let's start with that so let's keep in mind that although we have Kamala Harris and Tim wals and these are the public Representatives that are being displayed onto us there are people behind the scenes who are operating the campaign you have Barack Obama who is uh presumed to be operating the campaign of Cala Harris so individuals behind the scenes are coming up with these uh economic theories that they want to in terms of policy it's not necessarily Camala Harris she is a puppet just like Joe Biden was uh she just happens to be coherent enough to utilize as a public representative and Tim Wallace well that was an option chosen because the alternative who would who would have been a much better alternative Josh Shapiro he was Jewish or he still is Jewish he's Jewish and therefore Camala Harris at least her campaign did not want to pick him because they're trying to appease more towards the left crowd which is very sympathetic toward Wards Palestinians at this period of time with Israel and Palestine the conflict that's occurring overseas so what you have is this 25% uh tax on unrealized gains now what is an unrealized gain an unrealized gain just as an example let's say you purchase a home for $200,000 and let's say three years goes by the price of the home goes from 200,000 to 300,000 now you have a an unrealized gain of 100,000 now you haven't sold the property when you sell the property that's actually where the capital gains tax comes in and if it's a long-term if you if you've held it for over a year it's considered a long-term asset uh depending on your filing status and the in overall income that you've made you will pay either 0% 15% or 20% uh which is their as an incentive if you keep it for under a year and you sell the asset again when you go from holding the asset to selling the asset you go from unrealized to realize once you sell it under a year that's where it kicks into the regul income bracket instead of that separate bracket of 0 15 20% so you have that house 200 to 300 100K unrealized gains once you sell it that's when you pay tax uh now that makes sense I mean it is sound it's not perfect there are better Solutions like a flat tax rate for everyone in the US get rid of the IRS and the whole tax system in general I mean it would have to still exist to a uh minor degree to collect that 15% or even 10% uh flat tax that would apply to everyone but that would get rid of loopholes it would get rid of uh corporations if you're against them I'm not necessarily against them because that's what employers help build the United States of America uh it would allow for free opportunity it would allow for uh meritocracy it would allow for individuals to build themselves up uh whether they're at zero or at the top doesn't really matter they can move up and down that socioeconomic hierarchy now looking at this unrealized gain you own a home and and I don't want to say most people but many people in America their first perhaps their only asset in terms of appreciating asset is their home and they've been told the status quo indoctrination is you should purchase a home that's the best place where you want to put money in and if you do look at the metrics for the vast amount of people compared to a 401k people work a 9 to5 or a regular job they get a 401k assuming you're on salary and you have a contract with that company you have a 401k and there are a lot of problems with 401ks people actually build more wealth in their home uh and you're not necessarily Building Wealth but for a lack of a better term here or just to keep it reductive You're Building Wealth in your home and that actually yields more more benefit to you later in the future when you retire or you want to sell your home and you can now cash out but essentially you have a house most people uh who are trying to build towards the American dream they're going to opt into purchasing a home you have 100K unrealized gains now you haven't sold a home you have not sold that asset uh it is appreciating why is it appreciating generally you have properties that appreciate of course it's context dependent location dependent it's it it varies on the market that you're in but generally speaking because we have inflation which is just Congress spending trillions of dollars every s every single year adding more money into circulation and because we also have commercial Banks they actually contribute the largest towards inflation commercial Banks fabricating loans out of thin air and they work with the federal government on that and they're actually printing tens of trillions of dollars uh which are just out there in the world and they have uh we have fractional Reserve banking so they keep a a small fraction at least not physically but in their Bank on their balance sheet so that they can hand that money out in case there were to be a bank run uh in 1929 during the Great Depression that's essentially what you had amongst other things you had a bank run and the banks couldn't they couldn't fulfill the requests the demand they didn't have enough Supply So eventually the banks collapsed and you had a whole financial crisis so you now have to pay taxes on that 100K let's say it's 25k 25% of 100K you're going to pay that amount and you don't H you may not you may not necessarily have 25k just lying around in cash most people don't have 25k lying around in cash the average American uh well 60% of Americans love paycheck to paycheck the average American doesn't even have a few hundred bucks in their savings account for an emergency they don't have that Surplus uh most people I I don't even want to say most people are debt but a substantial amount of people are in debt to some degree um I forget what the numbers were for household debt but but it's it's not a super high amount but it's a high enough amount where you're really you're really operating on thin margins and you're hoping that you get that paycheck every two weeks just to sustain yourself and a lot of people of course they're in a deficit so they're just paying the minimum balance they're trying to hold off with uh interest or sometimes they're collecting interest but they're barely paying off that interest so if you have 200k to 300K you haven't done anything you you have the same job maybe your wages are the same so you haven't gotten an increase or promotion even when you get a promotion and you have a decent job the amount that you get on increase is maybe 1 to 3% a year uh and that may not even keep up with inflation most of the time it doesn't keep up with inflation and actually the best predictor or the best way to get an increase in wages is to jump positions go from one company to another company uh we have the data for that when you stay at the same company typically most of the time you don't actually make more money compared to if you you're in the same position but you apply to other jobs and you get that same position or even a better position at another place now of course you have to have that skill skill set and you have to be in a certain position in your career but you could still attempt it even if you're an entry-level worker um new places well new places to you are more likely to pay good money to new people to get them in and then once you're there well that's where the complacency hits and you end up staying in the same position you you don't really match inflation but let's say you matched inflation uh you're I wouldn't even even get in to matching inflation with wages because it's a whole spiral down that road we we'll go with this route the general savings accounts that people have if you go to a commercial bank now there are online savings accounts which don't have physical locations um they they actually you can use you can utilize physical locations because they have a contract with certain other companies and and you can do that um whether it's like ATM withdrawal or things of that nature but there are a lot of online savings accounts and there's a higher yield that is significantly better to 3 4 5% uh right now I don't even know what the interest rates are for that maybe it's around 3 4% if you go to a regular brick and mortar Commercial Bank it's less than 1% it's like Pennies on the dollar if even that it is so minuscule so when you're putting your money in a savings account you're actually you have 100K in your savings account let's say you put 100K in there and years go by you still have the 100K but when you have inflation and let's say inflation was 5% every year for 5 years your 100K can now only buy 75k worth of goods and services that's how inflation works because there's more money in circulation when you have more dollars that are out there each dollar is worth less so now you have to pay this gain this gains tax unrealized gain on that 25k 25k of the 100k from the h the house where you don't have cash flow you haven't improved anything you haven't sold the asset when you have that asset and most people can't cover that tax bill what do you have to do to cover that tax bill well you're going to have to sell the asset so you have to sell the asset now you have that you get 300K but it was really 100K gain you have to pay 25k in taxes now you're left with 275k and so even if you do go to purchase a new home well you're getting less of a home and remember prices have also increased so you're you're definitely also getting less of a home despite the 25k loss because the same house that you could have gotten for 100k cheaper a few years ago um it's now 100K more expensive just as an example so this is a way to deteriorate the middle class see when you have this proposed system of taxing unrealized gains it makes no economic it makes zero economic sense there's there's no fiscal sense in this what you're essentially doing is you're disrupting the stability and the ability for people to uh invest in assets and actually increase their net worth to actually become wealthy individuals or or not even wealthy but have some decent decent wealth like becoming middle class if people cannot invest in assets we're always in this fight against inflation let's say you can't control what the Federal Reserve does you can't control what Congress spends you can't control the treasury giving money to Congress you can't control these commercial Banks fabricating loans and increasing the inflation number you can't control any of that at least the individual by yourself who is not political or in a position of power or authority so what is your only solution well you start at zero generally most people start at zero and you go get a menial job and you work your way up and now you're making decent income the average income is like 40K a year uh maybe you even get to a better position position 60 70 80k a year so you're making good money what do you do now because you're you're going against inflation I just told you that even if you get promotions even at a sound good company your promotions are not going to keep up with inflation you putting your money into savings accounts is not going to keep up with inflation so how do you maintain I mean we can talk about growing wealth but how do you just maintain your wealth well you have to put your money into assets so as an example I'm not advocating you do this but if you put your money into gold gold actually matches in so you're not going to become wealthy from purchasing gold historically what we have seen is gold will at least keep your it's like a store of value it'll match inflation so let's say there was and I'm going to get these numbers wrong but let's just say you go back in time to when an ounce of gold was able to cover a suit you go back in time whatever that time was if you go to that time now uh remember the US dollar is getting inflated so the cost of Suits they're also getting inflated and so is that gold borrow that gold ounce and now they're matching each other so that same gold ounce can now match the current goods and prices that exist in our Marketplace that's just an asset it's not an appreciating asset although if you look at it in isolation it looks like it's appreciating but you're actually just matching inflation typically so you have to put your money into other assets that genuinely uh appreciate this would be as an example real estate or stocks so let's say you put your money into real estate let's say you put your money into stocks now you're trying to build build wealth if you have to to pay a tax on unrealized gains you're going to have to sell that asset once you sell that asset you no longer have the asset you can't build wealth so this policy is directly targeting the middle class eventually there won't be a middle class which is like the backbone of this nation uh now we can get into the the capital gains which really it's about the U it's just matching the income bracket that's really what it is now we're going from 37% to 44.6% now you don't pay that 4 44.6% on all your income just one once you get above a certain Financial threshold whatever the income is then you pay that 37% or the proposed 44.6% and so that margin you're paying uh that higher percentage and now what does this do uh a lot of people say these corporations are making too much money and we're hurting the middle class and we want to get out of this and actually build some wealth okay so we can make a case for okay many employers many companies are greedy and I I will agree to that they're greedy they'll hoard their wealth they won't play pay their employees as well uh but now let's talk about the free market because in a lot of those Industries there are monopolies duopolies or oligopolies that's a problem of the free market you have to you have to increase competition so let's talk about an industry that has competitive practices meaning if you have an industry there are like a 100 companies that that compete with each other so this is a true free market now these these companies have to compete on good and service so they have to to ensure that their goods are competitive in pricing relative to their the firms that they're going against they have to ensure that they have a quality product or a quality service and even with their employees they have to ensure that they're paying them well otherwise these employees can go to a separate company now can there be collusion between companies a lot of gas stations may do this for as an example where you have two gas stations on a corner and they'll instead of uh uh competing with each other or even as a byproduct of competing they'll get to the same result but they may collude with each other and put their prices very simil right but if you have 100 firms competing it's going to be hard to collude with all 100 firms unanimously you're going to have some disagreement there are going to be factions that don't want to agree with whatever the core ideology is and they're going to separate and and differ on pricing because they can get some leverage that way so now now companies are competing on pricing on paying their employees getting the best employees because if you pay them well you get better employees so generally speaking when you're in a competitive environment to sustain yourself and not even to sustain but to grow and be in that top one 2 3 four five position you're going to have to disperse your money in a well-mannered or well well-engineered way so it's not going to be about uh increasing the capital gains and all of a sudden companies are going to pay their fair share what has historically occurred um if you go back in time once the income tax was increased and this is not corporate right we're talking about individuals here when I say capital gains I'm just using corporations as an example because individuals run Cor corporations but if you go back in time wealthy and smart individuals once the income tax was too high they either legally or illegally found ways to shelter their money and what governments found out is over a certain threshold which it's like over 30% uh between 20 to 30% once you get above that threshold people start to take action to not reinvest their money because they're now dealing in strict Financial circumstances uh they don't innovate as well they shelter their money so you get less of a productive outcome towards your country uh once you keep it under a certain amount individuals and corporations genuinely say it's not worth us trying to find different ways to cover the uh to shelter the TA shelter the tax or the money we're just going to pay the tax we can still make a bunch of money so you keep it at a low percentage and now you actually reap more rewards in the long term and maybe well maybe not in the short term but definitely in the long term so we have to understand this difference here but what we're also not going to do is be antithetical towards American fundamentals uh having this progressive tax bracket system is discriminatory and it's we can say it's discriminatory towards a wealthy who can afford it but it is still discriminatory in America we don't we don't discriminate whether you're poor in the middle or at the top we don't discriminate now if you're in a industry where there's no competition and it's part of the standard of living that's your cap right so we live in a capitalist Society uh I mean in theory right now it's very mixed but in theory we live in a capitalist Society where you can build whatever you want make as much money as you want the only cap is once you start to infringe on rights so when you're no longer in a free market industry like big Tech telecommunications energy electricity internet service providers then there either needs to be an incentivization of other competitors to come in and compete with you if that is not applicable or or that's not a potential or an ability then government has to come in and regulate as a public utility once that occurs you now as a consumer consumer rights are derivative of individual rights you now retain all of your constitutional rights um this is all Theory now whoever's in power gets to do whatever they want from a practical point of view but in theory this is what is supposed to unfold if you are someone who's on the phone and use AT&T which is a telecommunication Wireless company which is regulated as a public utility because there's essentially an oligopoly with Telecom telecommunication companies um whether you're black white hispanic Asian it doesn't really matter no matter what you say theoretically you have your constitutional rights if you're saying something on the phone even if AT&T doesn't like it they can't do anything if they do they're infringing on that First Amendment right and government would have to come in and charge and prosecute them now does that happen in actuality in practicality no that doesn't happen the the federal agencies under the doj they will go to AT&T to go after individuals without a warrant um so we do have corrupt actors even within federal agencies within our government bureaucracy that's a whole separate conversation but essentially these policies that are being proposed they're very socialists in nature uh in a practical sense not in a theoretical sense so a theoretical socialist ideology would be the workers control the means of production what ends up happening in a practical sense because you can have Theory and then you have practical practical application because humans are biological organisms we have biological functions for example uh we form hierarchies so if you want to say everyone is going to be equal in a practical sense that never will occur because we form hierarchies people always want to be on top of each other for power competency whatever it is so when you have socialism in a theoretical sense the workers control the means of production which that's actually just capitalism because in a capitalist Society you get to control the means of production by your labor by your efforts you're building something you form a company and you can freely hire I mean capitalism is voluntary tra voluntary and consensual trade with individuals uh in a in a socialist type of situation from a practical sense the government ends up owning the means of production not the workers so now the government has authoritarianism uh they control everything now what we're seeing as with this policy is the degradation of the middle class what's going to occur with that communism communism is class Warfare so now you'll have Elites and plebs now you'll have these laws like unrealized gains and uh now let me P place the caveat here this specific policy that's being proposed is for individuals with a net worth over $100 million but even if it's for individuals with over $100 million everything trickles down from the top people can say oh it doesn't trickle down from the top look you make your money somehow how do you make money through other individuals how do individuals make money through employers how do employers make money from other uh consumers it's a cyclical thing but employers are paying employees that's essentially what's occurring right so uh when there's a a higher tax rake uh uh uh a higher tax rate what you're going to have is an effect that is eventually going to affect employees employees we want to be able to pay employees better give them uh Health Care Dental uh whatever it is we want to ensure that they're good employees for us but there has to be and I'm not saying there aren't greedy companies of course there are greedy companies but we cannot get rid of the middle class uh because that's what's going to occur in a practical sense they cannot build assets they cannot build wealth they have to be able to take money disposable and income invest into assets and not just every time you're Building Wealth in those assets is all unrealized if it's taxed every single time property tax is a very good example of this so we have private property rights property tax is inherently unconstitutional if you purchase a home you have the deed to the home you pay it off it's yours you can keep it for a thousand years in theory now of course if you use utilities like water electricity you have to pay for those utilities but if you don't want to pay for those utilities you just want to keep the home for a th years that is your ab the right to do that what the state has come in to do and by the way we never used to have these taxes we never used to have the income tax and even when we implemented it it was a very small percentage it was like 3% and it was for the very wealthy individuals at the top it wasn't until the 50s and the 60s where middle the middle class started to pay some tax uh so how did how did the US make money before that through tariffs uh but we could have a flat tax of 10% capita at 10% when you have property tax for a house you purchase home and remember these homes are going up because there's inflation so when you have inflation assets increase because it's not because the asset got any better the house didn't get any better in fact it probably got worse uh because things have wear and tear now you can do Renovations and things of that nature but you have the plumbing the piping the insulation all that gets bad over time so the house is not getting any better it's not a better product from when it was created what's occurring is you have more dollars that are being printed so these these uh prices of goods and services they're also increasing as inflation goes up that that's what inflation is and so your home is only going up because of inflation now your property taxes are based on the appraisal value of the home you have a County Appraiser County tax appraiser that will come appraise the value of your house let's say it's $1,000 one year now over time it goes up right and it's all based off inflation so if inflation is stable and your wages are stable uh even though this is completely antithetical to the Constitution let's just go with it you're wages are matching inflation let's say inflation is always 2% your your wages are always going up at 2% a year uh prices of goods and services are always going up at 2% a year okay everything is stable everything is equal as it was before but that's not what's occurring inflation is going up significantly 51 15 20% it depends on the industry that you're in it depends what you're looking at but with homes especially they have skyrocketed I mean it is it is now extremely unaffordable to purchase a home for the average person you no longer have that accessibility for the American Dream now that means the property tax is going to go up so every year you have to pay more and more property tax even if you have a good job in a few years that job is going to be mediocre or average you cannot keep up with that property tax what's going to happen when you cannot pay the property tax you have to sell your house to pay the property tax if you don't want to sell your house the government will come in and they will fine penalize you or imprison you or just seize your asset so you don't really have private property rights in this country this is the issue that have because if we're going to focus on the middle class if we're going to focus on people who are trying to build their wealth you started at zero and and there are many greedy Elites but even if you make it to become an elite status or an elite person what occurs is these individuals get to the top through opportunity and meritocracy but then they create barriers to make it almost impossible or impossible outright if they could get it through for people in the middle class for middle class to even exist but for people in the middle class to even compete and get to the top where they are they they use the benefit of America to get to the top and then they destroy America so people can't go to the top because they're at the top they enjoy it and a lot of these laws that they create they say that it'll apply to everyone but uh or even just the wealthy but eventually they'll adjust it to start applying to you to the middle class even if they didn't adjust 100 million net worth over a period of time uh just how we think like the average person makes 40K a year that was a lot 100 years ago right now it's just average so that's how inflation works if they don't adjust the number well eventually that will be the number that is going to be attributed to you but they're most likely going to adjust the number over time with their rhetoric with their emotional appeal um and still claim that you know people over $50 million are wealthy and people will generally agree now people over $10 million are still wealthy people will generally agree they'll keep going more and more and more uh now even if you're in the middle class even if your tax bracket is 20 to 30% that's about the average tax bracket that the person in the middle class pays you're paying over 50% in taxes uh still dependent on the state because their state income tax like in California which I believe is now going from 13 something per to 14 something per. just crazy but we are paying over 50% of taxes uh of our income if you went to imperialist Japan or ancient Egypt they did 20 to 30% tax that's it we're paying over 50% of tax property tax sales tax income tax state tax gas tax so many taxes that we have to pay and it's not like you pay the tax once and you're good let's say you make your income you pay an income tax you die now there are ways to get around this s loopholes like a a a b a cost basis Step Up tax or cost basis exemption uh and I can explain that later I'll just explain it now if you have a stock and let's say it's $100 a share uh well that's when you bought it and you held it and now it's $1,000 a share and you pass away instead of your uh your airs paying uh capital gains on the $900 of profit it's now reset at zero even though it's at a th000 it'll reset at zero and now you don't have to pay that I believe they haven't change that um there's also certain exemptions with the real estate you can also create trusts there are different ways to get around it but the average person you're going to be subject to that um now it does kick in after a certain amount something like 6 million I forget the exact number but if you're trying to build wealth in this country which is that's part of one of the fundamental principles of this country that is being eroded the middle class is being eroded so don't fall for this oh 25% unrealized gains is going to affect the wealthy that's how you build wealth as a middle class you shouldn't care or worry I mean you can care you can worry about individuals above you making money but if they're utilizing that money to suppress you that's when you really should care if you're not able to invest in appreciating assets keep up with inflation build wealth even just preserve some wealth why would you be for this policy if you're on the left people claim that they're on the left they're to they care about the middle class the working class the left is now the party of the wealthy all of the wealthy billionaires are on the left but let's just say you care about the working class you're on the left you should be vehemently opposed to this policy because this will prevent anyone from being in the middle class this will prevent anyone from investing into an asset holding that asset building real estate renting out having tenants getting cash flow purchasing stocks building a a startup this would prevent the middle class from existing and people at the top will manipulate the laws or manipulate the judicial or executive system and so they won't be subject to these same these same laws but even if they are they'll still slightly adjust it but even if they are they've already built those assets they have other ways and other means of skirting circumventing these laws that they've created for you not them and they already have all the assets so they're good you don't have the assets you're trying to build the assets you're starting at zero uh a lot of us have started at zero and we've built our way up and there's still plenty of miles to go ahead and a lot of us actually want to do some good with the capital that we earn um like I just gave an example prior to this maybe 10 minutes ago when you have a a company and you know that you're competing with other people who are out there you want to you want to pay your employees well not only because they're doing a good job for you but you also understand at some level whether it's conscious or subconscious it should be conscious that you have to go against other companies and so you have to ensure to retain the skill set for your business you have to pay them well now you can't pay them everything because you're running a business but you have to pay them well fair market value if not more that's your leverage and there there are different things that you can do for leverage but uh we don't truly live in a capitalist system despite what you know sometimes the left will say yes we do live in the capitalist system or no we don't live it depends on their rhetoric right uh we have a huge social welfare program uh it's actually programs social social security which is not even welfare it's really just a type of poni scheme it's your Capital there should be an opt-in opt out but instead you're required by law to pay money into the system which is then eroded into hell and if you don't want to pay some of your hard-earned income well we're going to imprison you because this is actually for your retirement so if you don't want to say for your retirement we're going to put you in prison that makes no sense but even if we did go along with it now when we pay you out we're actually not en counting for inflation uh or the money that you could have invested now Frank to be frank are most Americans going to invest soundly with their Capital no but that's why I say opt in opt out if you have smart people who want to opt out and they could do something with that extra Capital let them do that if they want to opt in because they don't think that they're going to be smart enough to invest their Capital Property properly and they want to pay out later down the road by the government let them do that this country is all about Choice the government cannot force you to do anything but here we are with all these taxes all these coercion you can't even own your property now they're trying to get rid of the middle class so you can't even invest in assets how are you going to build wealth in this country if you can't do any of that uh this is a serious issue so realized gains taxing on realized gains it's not a sound system there are better ways for the government to collect Capital uh like a consumption tax that would benefit the government substantially more than what they're doing now but of course government is greedy so they want their money now in the short term rather than thinking about the long term Government is made out of people these people want to look good they want to retain their positions of power they don't care about the next 10 years they care about the next one year or 6 months that's why all of our policies are steered towards the short term uh we have an income tax system instead of a consumption tax because they get their money now they get their money on every quarter uh if you're self-employed uh or they get their money once a year what well actually they would still get it every quarter because companies will pay on on behalf of the uh not even behalf of of the employees but your company you're going to pay for an employee your taxes are just taken out automatically of your paycheck W2 so we live in this system where everything is for the short term we need to we need to think about the long term a consumption tax would actually benefit the country significantly more and what we're trying to do at the end of the day is make a more productive country when there is more productivity in the country which generally wealthier people produce more of the productivity because they have companies they're innovating they're contributing to the marketplace in some fashion uh to to discriminate against that to penalize that and then to prevent the middle class from building up it's not not only inherently anti-American it actually goes against their constitution if we're following the original 10 Bill of Rights and so we have these policies that are socialist in nature in a practical sense they turn out to be communist and these individuals who are Representatives they're not coming up with this policy it's the people behind them you have the administrative State who is already in a position of power the elites the wealthy Elites at the top they're already in a position of power you who's watching this you're not in a position of power the vast majority of you you're not in a position of power you're in the middle class Maybe you're even in the upper middle class maybe you're in the lower middle class these policies negatively affect you and even if you're an elite eventually these policies can be used against you there are so many laws on the books that even if you're an elite and you're well connected if there's any power that's against you in some executive fashion that could be used if someone doesn't like you they feel threatened you did something that they don't like whether it was legal or illegal there are laws on the books that will determine if you've committed a felony just because it's on the book books and if you're targeted from a political point of view where someone wants to make an example out of you select a prosecution they could do that the judicial and executive system could do that in a practical sense not in a constitutional sense so this is what we're dealing with these policies are terrible uh even if you're on the left I don't know how you could be this U you won't be able to build wealth you will always be at the bottom the idea at the end of the day is for government to have you dependent on them because when you're dependent on government you have to do everything that the government wants you to do otherwise you don't get paid if you have a bad social credit score uh if you are misbehaving if you're not following mandates or edicts or orders if you're staying out past curfew I mean these are it sounds Draconian and authoritarian nature because it is but we already saw this in 2020 so it's not like this hasn't existed in America before it already existed a few years ago if you don't wear mask you get fine if you don't do what the government wants you to do well now once once you're dependent on the government entirely once there's no middle class uh you don't get a paycheck you can't survive which means you're forced you are coerced under duress to participate in actions that go against you for having autonomy or or bodily autonomy or any type of autonomy action thought autonomy uh autonomy of having a family having children so we need to think about these things from a long-term point of view taxing unrealized gains on every level does not help you if you're a Democrat if you're a republican if you're an independent moderate this doesn't help anyone it helps zero people except the people who are already in power which is like a handful of people a few hundred to a few thousand people this helps them but they also don't understand maybe maybe some of them do understand but they don't care that eventually these policies can be used against them as well