Kroger, Albertsons merger case to be heard by federal judge in Portland

AFFECT HOW MUCH YOU PAY AT AFFECT HOW MUCH YOU PAY AT THE AFFECT HOW MUCH YOU PAY AT THE GROCERY AFFECT HOW MUCH YOU PAY AT THE GROCERY STORE. THE GROCERY STORE. THE GROCERY STORE. FIRST THE GROCERY STORE. FIRST ON THE GROCERY STORE. FIRST ON FOX. FIRST ON FOX. FIRST ON FOX. GOOD FIRST ON FOX. GOOD EVENING FIRST ON FOX. GOOD EVENING WELCOME FIRST ON FOX. GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO FIRST ON FOX. GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE 6:00 GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE 6:00 NEWS GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE 6:00 NEWS I'M GOOD EVENING WELCOME TO THE 6:00 NEWS I'M RIELLE 6:00 NEWS I'M RIELLE 6:00 NEWS I'M RIELLE CREIGHTON. CREIGHTON. CREIGHTON. >> CREIGHTON. >> AND CREIGHTON. >> AND I'M CREIGHTON. >> AND I'M PETE CREIGHTON. >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> OREGON >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> OREGON JOINS >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> OREGON JOINS SIX >> AND I'M PETE FERRYMAN. >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER STATES >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER STATES AND >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER STATES AND THE >> OREGON JOINS SIX OTHER STATES AND THE FEDERAL STATES AND THE FEDERAL STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AN STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE NEARLY GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE NEARLY $25 GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE NEARLY $25 BILLION STOP THE NEARLY $25 BILLION STOP THE NEARLY $25 BILLION DEAL. DEAL. DEAL. FOX DEAL. FOX 12'S DEAL. FOX 12'S JULIA DEAL. FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ DEAL. FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FROM FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FROM OUTSIDE FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FROM OUTSIDE THE FOX 12'S JULIA LOPEZ REPORTS FROM OUTSIDE THE FEDERAL FROM OUTSIDE THE FEDERAL FROM OUTSIDE THE FEDERAL COURTHOUSE. COURTHOUSE. COURTHOUSE. >> COURTHOUSE. >> Reporter: COURTHOUSE. >> Reporter: COURT COURTHOUSE. >> Reporter: COURT HAS >> Reporter: COURT HAS >> Reporter: COURT HAS WRAPPED >> Reporter: COURT HAS WRAPPED UP >> Reporter: COURT HAS WRAPPED UP TODAY >> Reporter: COURT HAS WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT >> Reporter: COURT HAS WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT WE WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT WE WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT WE HEARD WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT WE HEARD FROM WRAPPED UP TODAY BUT WE HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES FROM HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES FROM SEVERAL HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES FROM SEVERAL CHAINS HEARD FROM REPRESENTATIVES FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE SHE'S FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE SHE'S COMPANIES FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE SHE'S COMPANIES SAY FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT FROM SEVERAL CHAINS WHILE SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE MERGER SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE MERGER WOULD SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP SHE'S COMPANIES SAY THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION AT MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION AT THE MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT LINE INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT LINE I INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT LINE I SPOKE INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT LINE I SPOKE WITH INFLATION AT THE CHECKOUT LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION REPRESENTATIVE LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION REPRESENTATIVE AND LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH LINE I SPOKE WITH UNION REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC WHO REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC WHO SAY REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC WHO SAY THEY REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE OPPOSITE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE OPPOSITE IS FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND FTC WHO SAY THEY FEAR THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT GROCERY OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT GROCERY PRICES OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT GROCERY PRICES ARE OPPOSITE IS TRUE AND THAT GROCERY PRICES ARE ALREADY GROCERY PRICES ARE ALREADY GROCERY PRICES ARE ALREADY HIGH GROCERY PRICES ARE ALREADY HIGH ENOUGH. HIGH ENOUGH. HIGH ENOUGH. >> HIGH ENOUGH. >> CONSUMERS HIGH ENOUGH. >> CONSUMERS SHOULD HIGH ENOUGH. >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL HIGH ENOUGH. >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE VERY, >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE VERY, VERY >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE VERY, VERY CONCERNED >> CONSUMERS SHOULD ALL BE VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT AND VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT AND WORKERS VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT AND WORKERS AS VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. >> IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. >> Reporter: IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. >> Reporter: THE IT AND WORKERS AS WELL. >> Reporter: THE LARGEST >> Reporter: THE LARGEST >> Reporter: THE LARGEST GROCERY >> Reporter: THE LARGEST GROCERY STORE >> Reporter: THE LARGEST GROCERY STORE MERGER >> Reporter: THE LARGEST GROCERY STORE MERGER IN >> Reporter: THE LARGEST GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY IS GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY IS ON GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY IS ON THE GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY IS ON THE TABLE GROCERY STORE MERGER IN U.S. HISTORY IS ON THE TABLE HERE HISTORY IS ON THE TABLE HERE HISTORY IS ON THE TABLE HERE IN HISTORY IS ON THE TABLE HERE IN PORTLAND. IN PORTLAND. IN PORTLAND. AS IN PORTLAND. AS FEDERAL IN PORTLAND. AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS IN PORTLAND. AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY MANY AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY MANY AMERICANS AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY MANY AMERICANS ARE AS FEDERAL OFFICIALS SAY MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY STRUGGLINGS MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY STRUGGLINGS TO MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY STRUGGLINGS TO PUT MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY STRUGGLINGS TO PUT FOOD MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY STRUGGLINGS TO PUT FOOD ON STRUGGLINGS TO PUT FOOD ON STRUGGLINGS TO PUT FOOD ON THEIRS. THEIRS. THEIRS. >> THEIRS. >> AMERICANS THEIRS. >> AMERICANS ARE THEIRS. >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING THEIRS. >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE AMOUNTS >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE AMOUNTS OF >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT >> AMERICANS ARE PAYING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE GROCERY AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE GROCERY STORE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE GROCERY STORE FOR AMOUNTS OF MONEY AT THE GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES LIKE GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES LIKE BREAD, GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES LIKE BREAD, MILK, GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, GROCERY STORE FOR STAPLES LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND THEY'RE LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND THEY'RE FEELING LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND THEY'RE FEELING THE LIKE BREAD, MILK, EGGS, AND THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. >> THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. >> Reporter: THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. >> Reporter: THAT'S THEY'RE FEELING THE PINCH. >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE FTC >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE FTC IS >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE FTC IS JOINED >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE FTC IS JOINED BY >> Reporter: THAT'S WHY THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN STATES, THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN STATES, INCLUDING THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN STATES, INCLUDING OREGON THE FTC IS JOINED BY SEVEN STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN CHALLENGING STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN CHALLENGING KROGER STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS STATES, INCLUDING OREGON IN CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE NATIONAL CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE NATIONAL CHAIN CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH CHALLENGING KROGER FOODS THE NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS FRED NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS FRED MEYER NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS FRED MEYER AND NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS FRED MEYER AND QFC NATIONAL CHAIN WHICH OWNS FRED MEYER AND QFC IS FRED MEYER AND QFC IS FRED MEYER AND QFC IS DEFENDING FRED MEYER AND QFC IS DEFENDING ITS FRED MEYER AND QFC IS DEFENDING ITS $24.6 FRED MEYER AND QFC IS DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FRED MEYER AND QFC IS DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR ALBERTSON DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR ALBERTSON BID DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR ALBERTSON BID WHICH DEFENDING ITS $24.6 BID FOR ALBERTSON BID WHICH OWNS ALBERTSON BID WHICH OWNS ALBERTSON BID WHICH OWNS SAFEWAY. SAFEWAY. SAFEWAY. >> SAFEWAY. >> FTC SAFEWAY. >> FTC WILL SAFEWAY. >> FTC WILL ARGUE SAFEWAY. >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT SAFEWAY. >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS MERGER >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS MERGER IF >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS MERGER IF IT >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS MERGER IF IT GOES >> FTC WILL ARGUE THAT THIS MERGER IF IT GOES THROUGH MERGER IF IT GOES THROUGH MERGER IF IT GOES THROUGH WILL MERGER IF IT GOES THROUGH WILL REDUCE MERGER IF IT GOES THROUGH WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WHICH WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WHICH WILL WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WHICH WILL RAISE WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES WILL REDUCE COMPETITION WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON CONSUMERS WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON CONSUMERS IT WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON CONSUMERS IT AND WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON CONSUMERS IT AND WILL WHICH WILL RAISE PRICES ON CONSUMERS IT AND WILL ALSO CONSUMERS IT AND WILL ALSO CONSUMERS IT AND WILL ALSO HARM CONSUMERS IT AND WILL ALSO HARM WORKERS. HARM WORKERS. HARM WORKERS. >> HARM WORKERS. >> Reporter: HARM WORKERS. >> Reporter: THAT HARM WORKERS. >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS TOP >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS TOP OF >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS TOP OF MIND >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS TOP OF MIND FOR >> Reporter: THAT CONCERN IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE UNITED IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE UNITED FOOD IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE UNITED FOOD AND IS TOP OF MIND FOR THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION. WORKERS UNION. WORKERS UNION. >> WORKERS UNION. >> WE'RE WORKERS UNION. >> WE'RE JUST WORKERS UNION. >> WE'RE JUST GOING WORKERS UNION. >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO WORKERS UNION. >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ONE >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ONE GIANT >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ONE GIANT COMPANY >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT THEY'RE ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT THEY'RE GOING ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO ONE GIANT COMPANY LIKE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE INCREDIBLE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE INCREDIBLE CONTROL THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE INCREDIBLE CONTROL OVER INCREDIBLE CONTROL OVER INCREDIBLE CONTROL OVER THEIR INCREDIBLE CONTROL OVER THEIR EMPLOYEES. THEIR EMPLOYEES. THEIR EMPLOYEES. >> THEIR EMPLOYEES. >> Reporter: THEIR EMPLOYEES. >> Reporter: WHO THEIR EMPLOYEES. >> Reporter: WHO SAY >> Reporter: WHO SAY >> Reporter: WHO SAY COMPETITION >> Reporter: WHO SAY COMPETITION BETWEEN >> Reporter: WHO SAY COMPETITION BETWEEN THE >> Reporter: WHO SAY COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO STORE COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO STORE GIANTS COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO STORE GIANTS IS COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST AS STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST AS BAR STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST AS BAR BRING STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST AS BAR BRING POWER STORE GIANTS IS CRUCIAL NOT JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR HUNDREDS JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR HUNDREDS OF JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS JUST AS BAR BRING POWER FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNIONIZED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNIONIZED WORKERS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR CONSUMERS UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR CONSUMERS WITHOUT UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT UNIONIZED WORKERS BUT FOR CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE SAYS CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE SAYS THE CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE SAYS THE COMPANY CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE SAYS THE COMPANY HAS CONSUMERS WITHOUT IT SHE SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO INCENTIVES SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO INCENTIVES TO SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO INCENTIVES TO LOWER SAYS THE COMPANY HAS NO INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. >> INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. >> SO INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. >> SO NOW INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. >> SO NOW JUST INCENTIVES TO LOWER PRICES. >> SO NOW JUST ABOUT >> SO NOW JUST ABOUT >> SO NOW JUST ABOUT CORPORATE >> SO NOW JUST ABOUT CORPORATE GREED. CORPORATE GREED. CORPORATE GREED. >> CORPORATE GREED. >> Reporter: CORPORATE GREED. >> Reporter: THEY CORPORATE GREED. >> Reporter: THEY TOLD CORPORATE GREED. >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX 12 >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX 12 THAT >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX 12 THAT THE >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX 12 THAT THE MERGER >> Reporter: THEY TOLD FOX 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION 12 THAT THE MERGER WOULD HELP FIGHT INFLATION BY HELP FIGHT INFLATION BY HELP FIGHT INFLATION BY LOWERING HELP FIGHT INFLATION BY LOWERING PRICES HELP FIGHT INFLATION BY LOWERING PRICES BY LOWERING PRICES BY LOWERING PRICES BY $1 LOWERING PRICES BY $1 BILLION LOWERING PRICES BY $1 BILLION RAISING LOWERING PRICES BY $1 BILLION RAISING WAGES LOWERING PRICES BY $1 BILLION RAISING WAGES AND $1 BILLION RAISING WAGES AND $1 BILLION RAISING WAGES AND SUPPORTING $1 BILLION RAISING WAGES AND SUPPORTING UNIONS. SUPPORTING UNIONS. SUPPORTING UNIONS. ALBERTSONS SUPPORTING UNIONS. ALBERTSONS SAID SUPPORTING UNIONS. ALBERTSONS SAID THAT SUPPORTING UNIONS. ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ONLY ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ONLY BENEFACTORS ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ONLY BENEFACTORS OF ALBERTSONS SAID THAT THE ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED MERGER ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED MERGER WOULD ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED MERGER WOULD BE ONLY BENEFACTORS OF BLOCKED MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, AMAZON MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, AMAZON AND MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, AMAZON AND OTHER MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE MERGER WOULD BE WAL-MART, AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END RETAILERS AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END RETAILERS WHO AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END RETAILERS WHO THEY AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY AMAZON AND OTHER LARGE END RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE A RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE A DOMINANCE RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE A DOMINANCE IN RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE A DOMINANCE IN THE RETAILERS WHO THEY SAY HAVE A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. >>> A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. >>> TODAY A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. >>> TODAY IN A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. >>> TODAY IN COURT A DOMINANCE IN THE INDUSTRY. >>> TODAY IN COURT THE >>> TODAY IN COURT THE >>> TODAY IN COURT THE CONSIDER >>> TODAY IN COURT THE CONSIDER KROGERING >>> TODAY IN COURT THE CONSIDER KROGERING TO >>> TODAY IN COURT THE CONSIDER KROGERING TO BE >>> TODAY IN COURT THE CONSIDER KROGERING TO BE A CONSIDER KROGERING TO BE A CONSIDER KROGERING TO BE A PRIMARY CONSIDER KROGERING TO BE A PRIMARY COMPETITOR. PRIMARY COMPETITOR. PRIMARY COMPETITOR. THE PRIMARY COMPETITOR. THE PROCEEDINGS PRIMARY COMPETITOR. THE PROCEEDINGS ARE PRIMARY COMPETITOR. THE PROCEEDINGS ARE ABOUT THE PROCEEDINGS ARE ABOUT THE PROCEEDINGS ARE ABOUT PROVIDING