We have to expose Kamala Harris for exactly who she is: Sen. Roger Marshall | Newsline

policies. But you are original co-sponsor of the Save act. And the fact is attached to this. And now there's the deadline, which some say complicates it. How do you work around that? Because it's a very important act that I think Americans, you know, need to have, that these workarounds cannot be tolerated with the millions of people who have come in under Biden-Harris. Yeah. So look, Joe Biden has already said he does not support this. And as Kamala told us, there's no separation between herself and Joe Biden to your point, these 12 million people that they've ushered across the country, they want them to vote. Is there anything more important to the success and vitality of our democracy than election integrity? That's what the law says. The law says that only citizens can vote. So what would be wrong with proving you're a citizen when you go register to vote? Look last election, what was there, 42,000 votes? That was separated President Trump from from Joe Biden? We need to make sure that doesn't happen again. Now we have folks like Elon Musk vocal about this on X, talking about, you know, how security is in our nation and you have thought leaders talking about this. He says right here because not requiring ID combined with mail in votes makes it completely impossible to prove fraud. There's a concern about this now. It was passed in July, Senator, that it's illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal election. But this takes a little a step further. Yeah. It puts some teeth with it so that there's actually punishment for this, that if you're voting illegally, if you're registering illegally, there'll be some type of punishment for it, much like it's against the law to speed. But we need to say, well, what is the speed limit? And then here's the punishment for that as well. So I think it takes it to the next step. And nobody can argue that this makes the election more or less less secure. So I think it's all there's all good things. But why are Democrats against it. And that's what we need to expose them for this. We need to get John Tester on record. We need to get Kamala Harris on. This would have been a great debate question, wouldn't it, for Tuesday night. I would have loved to have asked a question like that. And of course, if she had done news conferences too and spoke to reporters in Gaggles, we might actually have thoughtful questions like that. You're right. Donald Trump's also putting this out there, too. So folks who are, you know, following him are listening as well. He says if Republicans in the House and Senate don't get assurances on election security, he writes here that they should. The Democrats are trying to stuff voter registration with illegal aliens. Don't let it happen. Close it down. Okay, so we have a deadline October 1st. Is a shutdown possible because of the save act? Would it go that far? I think it is possible. I don't think it's anybody here wants. And what we have to be careful of is, since the Democrats control the national media, that if there is a shutdown, they'll blame Republicans right before the election. So we need to keep our eye on the big prize here and the big prize is the white House getting the majority in the Senate and the House as well. Yeah. And, you know, the debate was very glaring with the moderators as you just mentioned. But afterwards, what is kind of encouraging is people, actually the ones that are independent weren't necessarily swayed by anything she did. She may have thinks, you know, I live to see another day, but I want to play a little bit of CNN talking about the polls post-debate. Senator, 37% said Harris, 53%. Trump after the debate. Again, margin of error stuff here. But numerically, she lost a little ground. 35% said so after the debate that she would better handle the economy, 55% said Trump. And we know that is one of his strongest suits across the polling in this election. There you have it. And today she's going to go to Charlotte and try to talk about the economy. And Americans aren't buying it. I guess that that's a glimmer of hope here. Yeah. If you watch that debate and you're trying to say, who's going to fight for my family, which one of those two candidates is going to make my family safe again? Which one of those candidates is going to bring the price of gas and groceries down of housing? To me, there could have been a bigger contrast. President Trump has proven he can do it before. Kamala Harris is running from her record. She says she has a plan, but she won't tell us what the plan is. I'm very confident going in. Donald Trump's going to get out there and fight, fight, fight for us. Yeah. When she does have a plan, some of it's no tax on tip stealing it from Donald Trump. And you know the debate questions. Also many said that they wanted to kind of look backwards. And I felt like that basically set Donald Trump up. As many have called that out. You know, people in Kansas care about the economy. They care about issues that are bread and butter issues. And the people asking the questions live in a bubble. And Kamala Harris lives in a bubble. And if you get Taylor Swift's endorsement after she's not buying your gas and groceries. Senator, do we need to change who's asking these questions in the debate structure moving forward? Absolutely. I would love to see someone from from Newsmax and somebody from CNN, you know, side beside asking the questions equal fact checking as well. But but our job for the next six weeks we got left is we have to expose Kamala Harris exactly for who she is, that she's the person that ushered in 12 million illegal aliens across into this country. We've lost 300,000 young adults to fentanyl poisoning. They're responsible for the cost of gas and groceries, of rent, of child care. All these things just blowing up right in front