Female Attorney Celebrates Tyrese's Jail Time, Claims Ex Wife Deserves His Money Using Child Support

this is not your friend and it's not going to be your friend for many many years and so I always say instead of approaching this as though you're divorcing a friend you need to prop do it as though this is a a business dispute where a business is being split and each of you are going your ways you need to ask for everything that you feel entitled to [Music] [Applause] Tyrese Gibson is back in the headlines but this time it's for something much bigger being temporarily detained for unpaid child support now according to a female attorney attorney Simone from the channel girl is that legal Tyrese makes 275k a month and his ex-wife deserves at least 10% of that for that child has uh Tyrese told the court that he earned $270,000 per month per month but that he feels that he should only have to pay $3500 a month for child support even though for the older child that he's not on child support for he gifted her in the ninth grade with a phantom Rose Royce so uh or with a Rolls-Royce I could have the model incorrect anyway this man is c for Cocoa Puffs he has been arrested he's gonna have to pay the $773,000 it is now to get his behind out or put up a bond because he said says he's appealing the verdict he doesn't feel he feels that she should only have to pay $3,500 a month which is about 1% of his monthly income and oh and from that his ex-wife is supposed to you know pay for half of daycare private school all of the above including medical expenses and this is what he thinks is reasonable attorney Simone and her viewers are claiming that 10K a month isn't enough for Tyrese's child but here what they aren't mentioning Tyrese's ex-wife signed a preno agreed to the terms divorced him and is now using that child as a bargaining chip check out what this woman had to say now it's time for us to get into this and do what we got to do because we many we we many [Music] we for the last four years okay so these people these people they married her the wife is ex-wife is Samantha Gibson they married Valentine's Day of uh 17 had their child a year later um I guess during Co she would about sick of his behind and filed for divorce September 20120 okay this divorce was messy and it took like two years to drain out do you know from the date she filed for divorce until currently this man was only paying 2000 236 a month $2,236 a month that didn't even include daycare that didn't even include daycare daycare was an additional $1,274 than mine and part of his argument is he thinks this too much money for a five-year old that the baby should get less shut up oh sorry then drop my little gavel holer m you see what she just did there this attorney I'm calling her a clown at this point has already dismissed any sense of justice drop the gavel because she's not worthy of holding on to it she's clearly not looking for fairness and here's why she casually mentions that during covid Samantha Lee got sick of Tyrese was done with him and left but why do we always assume it's the man's fault when a woman leaves she left she took their child with her and we're supposed to accept her side without any deeper questions let's listen to Samantha herself and my whole goal of that hardly initiated interview was completely taking accountability for my part and how I would have done things differently and I'm going to go over what those things were first thing I said was that at the time of of certain things I I you know when I when I filed I was not I filed In the Heat of a moment I was very very hurt I was very very angry I never said I regretted my whole decision what I did say was I regretted doing it in a moment where I was emotionally intoxicated if I could take that back I would you don't win when a family brok is broken apart I think Jay-Z said this he's like nobody wins when the family feuds yeah when you get lawyers involved and you know there was a therapist that was speaking to both me and him a marital therapist at the time that when I told him my decision he was like um you know when you get lawyers involved it gets ugly you tell me that and you know I didn't even realize I don't think I even realized how ugly it would get you know and like I said I could I could walk back in time you know sometimes I battle with myself about that but at that time I thought I was doing the right thing or the best thing you know I didn't know I didn't know how ugly it could get D it is Samantha Lee fully aware that she didn't handle things the right way took their child and made things ugly on purpose she didn't even try to work things out she left and hired lawyers immediately she weaponized her child and made sure the court system would work in her favor now if Tyrese had filed for divorce and kept their child guess what the court still would have favored Canta the system isn't set up for fairness it's set up to take advantage of men think about this $2200 per month for child support for a one-year-old plus $1,100 for care what else does the child need golden diapers Samantha herself makes six figures she's not broke she chose to leave and now she's demanding money for the child she took away from him if that doesn't scream selfishness I don't know what does we're going to skip this on down to the juicy Parts premarital agreement on February 2nd the parties entered into a prap okay the prap address issues of Equitable division of property and liabilities alimony and attorneys fees the wife in her petition for divorce and the husband and his counter claim both pled for premarital agreement to be adopted and incorporated into any final do so both sides says yep we want the court to adhere to the prenut division of property that part was fine that was agreed to here's a catcher you see how she just brushes over the premarital agreement this is critical because because that document was signed by both parties before their marriage outlining exactly what each person was entitled to in case of a split the premarital agreement is the foundation of this case it clearly states that Samantha isn't entitled to alimony or a big payout from Tyrese's personal assets which is why she's resorting to using child support as her new Target this is a clear sign that this isn't about supporting the child it's about securing the bag she took their child because she knew that that was her golden ticket there was no effort to resolve things personally with Tyrese because she knows 20K a month for child support is outrageous but since the premarital agreement blocked her from any direct financial gain the child became her meal ticket and by the way let's not forget she made sure there child wasn't old enough to express any desire to stay with Tyrese she made sure the child couldn't talk and say I want to stay with daddy this was calculated this is what no one wants to address this is the part that women don't want to talk about how women manipulate the system and play the victim to trap men financially now here's where Tyrese made a big mistake um it says in a footnote this includes the wife's claim for lumps some child support from the time that she filed her petition through child and here's what's really stupid part um footnote two it says although the prenup addresses issues of alimon or spousal support and attorney's fees and expenses of litigation the terms of the prenup still require the Court's involvement because this dun of a lawyer added a provision that said says basically there's um there's a prenup unless the Court decides the prup is unfair boy what that was a huge mistake because if it's a prenup unless a Court decides if it's reasonable then don't you think your wife is gonna ask the court to decide if it's reasonable cuz that's what she did here stupid this is where women pull out every excuse in the book to get as much money as they can I signed under the arrest he was abusive I need to maintain my lifestyle they will CL anything because they know the system is built to cater to these emotional pleas and here is attorney Simone repeating the same Tire talking point check this out had not been disclosed so and then it says uh yet husband presented no evidence wife earned income Beyond her W2 income and self-employment income disclosed on her Forum instead husband simply argued the inference that wife must have been earning more money due to her spending habits which exceeded her deposits in certain months well listen stupid if she was used to being married to you in a joint household she and her child probably had certain regular expenses perhaps it was a NeNe perhaps it was daycare other things that you're not paying for again at this time like prior to the divorce decree he was only giving 2236 a month the child's daycare was 12274 per month mom had to use that 223 to pay rent furnish it nanny food you know all of the above all right let's move on down now we're hearing that Samantha had to pay rent what happened to being strong and independent where is all that talk about not needing a man Samantha makes over six figures herself so why does she need an extra 10K a month for child support it's not about the child it's about maintaining a lifestyle she's no longer in entitled to and here is where the hypocrisy gets worse when the shoe is on the other foot like when Mary J blig had to pay her ex-husband alimony all of a sudden it's not fair check this out let me just speak it's so whack right now that men you know can come ask you and get and and you know young and get alimony so when I was getting a divorce I was like you mean to tell me I I got to pay him and he cheated and he lied and he stole and you know not to get all petty but you know what I'm saying you mean I got to pay him for cheating and lying on to me and ruining my life see that when a man has to pay everyone is clapping but when the woman has to cough up money it's suddenly a problem it's not about equality it's about control these women claim to want equality but when it comes to find fincial responsibility they conveniently forget all about that now let's dive deeper says in accordance with the child support guidelines the basic support obligation um does not exceed 2 2236 when parents earned a combined Ro uh monthly income of 30,000 or higher that means that's the base that they use and then they can add to it the court however has the discretion to impose an upward deviation to obain an appropriate amount of support for high income parents which is consistent with the best interest of the child meaning do what's best for your kid okay inherent is the Court's ability considered an upward deviation to child support based on high income to achieve the state policy of affording children of unmarried parents to the extent possible the same economic standard of living enjoyed by intact families consisting of parents with similar financial means basically because you're growing up in a single parent home you should not have less resources than if your parents stayed married to the narcissist daddy that you got who's crazy as an example okay so Tyrese is the narcissist but not Samantha how does that make sense she is the one who broke up the family and immediately went to court there was no confination no mediation just straight to the lawyers who's the real Nar IST here Samantha Lee made a selfish choice and now Tyrese is paying the price and let me remind you many many many many women are single mothers by choice they make these decisions knowing the system will back them attorney Simone even admitted that this is all just a business let's take a look this is not your friend and it's not going to be your friend for many many years and so I always say instead of approaching this as though you're divorcing a friend you need to prop do it as though this is a a business dispute where a business is being split and each of you are going your ways you need to ask for everything that you feel entitled to for women this is business plain and simple we've covered this before on this channel from books like the manipulated man to Men on strike this has been proven time and time again female nature is to secure resources and and if that means using the court system to extract money from men they will do it this is why you should wake up and don't get married protect yourself at all times this isn't just about Tyrese it's about a broken system that's rigged against men if you don't protect yourself the court system will eat you alive and as we've seen with this female attorney and her live stream the goal isn't Justice it's money stay tuned for more as we dive deeper into the callers and their reactions man we working protect yourself at all times this video has officially been highlighted [Music]