Trump vs. Harris : Roe v. Wade - Future of Abortion Rights Explained

Introduction to Roe v. Wade and abortion rights what if I told you that one Court ruling could Define the future of Reproductive Rights in America today we're diving into one of the most emotionally charged and polarizing issues in US politics abortion rights specifically the future of Row versus Wade The Landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion Nationwide and how state level restrictions are challenging it especially in the upcoming US presidential election let's start by understanding Row versus Wade in 1973 the Supreme Court ruled that a woman's right to choose to have an abortion was protected by the Constitution specifically under the right to privacy for decades this decision has been at the center of fierce debates with both pro-choice and pro-life movements fighting for their vision of what Reproductive Rights should look like but today the Legal Foundation of Row versus Wade is facing unprecedented challenges let's start Trump’s position on abortion and state-level restrictions with Donald Trump during his presidency Trump appoint appointed three Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Cony Barrett creating a conservative majority on the court Trump has been clear about his opposition to Row versus Wade expressing a desire for states to have the power to regulate abortion on their own terms this shift from a federal right to a state controlled issue could drastically change the landscape of abortion access in America Trump's conservative appointees may eventually decide whether to overturn or were severely limit Row versus Wade if that happens abortion rights would no longer be protected at the national level meaning each state could set its own rules some states have already passed trigger laws laws that would automatically ban or heavily restrict abortion if row is overturned so Trump's Vision it's about pushing the decision-making power on abortion back to the States a system where some states could maintain access to abortion While others could enforce severe restrictions or outright bands now let's turn to Harris’s stance on protecting abortion rights and federal intervention kamla Harris Harris is firmly pro-choice and she supports codifying roow versus Wade in a federal law ensuring that the right to an abortion is protected Nationwide regardless of what happens with the Supreme Court her stance is that abortion is a fundamental right and removing it would disproportionately harm low-income women and women of color who may not have the resources to travel to states where abortion remains legal Harris has called out state level restrictions as a direct attack on women's reproductive rights in her view recent laws in States like Texas and Alabama which heavily restrict abortion access are unconstitutional Harris advocates for the federal government to step in and protect access to abortion even if roow versus Wade were overturned but here's the question how do we get here state level restrictions on The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion access abortion have been increasing for years some states require waiting periods mandatory count counseling or even Force providers to give medically inaccurate information to patients and in some cases like Texas's Senate Bill 8 laws ban abortions as early as 6 weeks before many women even know they're pregnant so we have two very different approaches Trump's Vision which could lead to a patchwork of laws where each state decides on abortion rights and Harris's Vision which aims to protect access at the national level through federal law the big question is what happens if Row Conclusion: What’s at stake for the future of Roe v. Wade? versus Wade is overturned if that occurs it wouldn't automatically ban abortion across the country instead it would hand the power back to the states where laws could vary wildly in some states abortion would remain legal and accessible While others might Outlaw it completely creating an environment where access to reproductive Health Care depends on where you live but at the heart of this debate is a deeper question what should the role of government be in deciding personal health care choices for the those who support Trump's position it's about returning power to the states and allowing local governments to reflect the will of their citizens for Harris's supporters it's about protecting individual rights and ensuring equal access to health care Across the Nation so as the US presidential election approaches the future of abortion rights and Row versus Wade is one of the most critical issues on the table will Trump's conservative Supreme Court reshape Reproductive Rights in America or Will Harris p push to safeguard abortion rights at the federal level thanks for watching mind circuit don't forget to like subscribe and let me know in the comments what do you think the future of Row versus wage should be should abortion rights be left to the states or should they be federally protected stay curious and I'll see you next time