Why is Starmer letting Biden paint a target on OUR backs for Russia?

right so I don't know about you but when I went to vote in the general election and I'd done my homework and I knew who the different Party leaders were and what they said they stood for even if they were lying about it I definitely would have noticed if Joe Biden was somewhere in that mix yet despite not being elected At All by us here in the UK tier starmer is apparently allowing him to dictate what our weapons can be used for and can you guess what he's saying that our weapons our Storm Shadow long range weapons that we've handed to Ukraine can be used on Russian targets within Russian borders which amounts to a declaration of war tier starmer appears to be so stupid that he's prepared to allow Biden to make this call on our behalf though goodness knows Kier starmer himself has already been saying as much and being condemned for it a clear declaration of war ourselves on Russia as this would be if our Arsenal no matter who happens to be using it gets used against another country but now it pretty much looks like Biden is operating starma like some kind of a glove puppet she just get rid of starmer and foreign secretary David Lamy all together then and just have the White House's people over instead it would at least be more transparent that way it seems doesn't it but actually it's even worse than just that you see where Biden will apparently let Ukraine use UK missiles against Russia he won't let them use American ordinance therefore he's declaring ing war on behalf of other countries but not his own now why would that be and why is kir starmer that stupid that he'd be willing to go along with this as seems to be the case right so what's going on here then Doo well in a nutshell genocide Joe Biden has said Ukraine can use British long-range missiles against targets behind the Russian border and if you think this isn't going to happen well here's the BBC admitting as much itself and let's face it normally they'd be the first wants to try and bury such news if the consequences perhaps weren't so severe for us here in the UK the US president could be on the verge of allowing Ukraine to use Western made long-range missiles deep inside Russia according to European officials the New York Times reports but there would be a caveat Ukraine wouldn't be allowed to use weapons provided by the US for that purpose Joe Biden's discussing the issue with Britain's prime minister Kier starmer in Washington today it would be part of a coordin ated strategy to help Ukraine push back after Russia's fullscale invasion in February 2022 the angl French cruise missile Storm Shadow which has a maximum range of around 250 km or 155 mil is considered an ideal weapon for penetrating bunkers and ammunition stores the UK and France have already sent the weapons to Ukraine but the caveat until now has been that it could only be used within Ukraine's own borders so we have a US president on the verge of allowing Ukraine to use Western made longrange missiles for which you later read the storm Shadows we he in the UK provided but the caveat is that the US provided weapons that they've already sent to Ukraine cannot be used for that purpose so Joe Biden too infirm to run for president any longer Joe Biden is now dictating what our Weaponry supplied to Ukraine can be used for and is apparently going to place Us in the firing line to do so but not himself and all kir starma can do it seems is nod that through and go along with it and we know that already because he's already been stopped once from giving the okay to do this already when it turned out he didn't actually have the final say on such things now it seems the man who does have the final say on such things is Joe Biden for some reason and now it seems he's going to go for it and we're being softened up to go along with that decision Secretary of State and nailed on Zionist Anthony blinkin along with David Lamy our foreign secretary although it seems he's just taking dictat from the US on that held a joint speech a press conference last Wednesday basically saying this is all Russia's fault they invaded Ukraine they've brought this on themselves so as much as that might be true it ignores the fact that NATO expansionism eastwards following the fall of the B Berlin Wall was a promise broken by NATO to Russia which has always been seen as a threat to Russia as well and the US backed too in Ukraine back in 2014 pretty much put the US and therefore NATO since the US calls all the shots there it seems going by this story anyway on Russia's border nobody tends to mention that bit at the end there and as much as you might support NATO and hate Putin look at it from Russia's perspective a moment here before you start making claims of Russia bad NATO good because things are never that black and white things are never that straightforward and simple yet our us-backed politicians being worn as Meat Puppets as they seem to be would have you believe otherwise regardless of your feelings one way or another on the matter of the Ukraine war and I'm very much of the opinion blame and fault lies with both sides it always takes two to start a war we ourselves here in the UK could now be dragged into this war to an extent we hadn't been previously because Putin is right when he says if UK made weapons for example are used against Target on Russian soil that would be a declaration of war he did this with Ukraine didn't he was that not a declaration of war are we not blaming the US for the atrocities being witnessed in Gaza right now because they are supplying weapons when we know Israel are using them against Palestinians are we not demanding our own weapons stop being sold to Israel because they might be being used against Palestinians and that might lead to the UK being charged with war crimes or individuals within government certainly makes sense doesn't it what's the difference so are we ourselves here in the UK about to become a target for Russia in which case a direct Target for Russia as a result of this move if we go ahead with allowing Ukraine to use our Storm Shadow longrange missiles in Russia or rather if Joe Biden lets them use them well it seems obvious that we would and why just take my word word for it because Vladimir Putin himself has said it and this coverage of his comments by anadolu agency adds another more Insidious slant to the story which would if true implicate the West even more than just handing over weapons to Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that allowing Kev to conduct longrange strikes inside his country using Western weapons would mean NATO's direct involvement in the war in Ukraine if this decision allowing longrange strikes inside Russia using Western happens is made it will mean nothing less than the direct participation of NATO countries the United States and European countries in the war in Ukraine Putin told reporters following a forum in the city of St Petersburg Putin claimed that the Ukrainian military is not capable of striking Russia with Western longrange weapons and that this is only possible with the use of intelligence obtained from satellites belonging to Nato he further claimed the instructions for such weapons can only be entered by NATO military personnel meaning that discussion on this matter raises a question of whether NATO countries are directly involved in the military conflict or not this will mean that NATO countries United States and European countries are fighting Russia and if this is so then bearing in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be created for us he added so handing Ukraine the missiles themselves may not be enough according to Putin that without NATO intelligence Ukraine could not find the right targets to use these missiles on and Ukraine cannot also gather that intelligence itself it requires NATO Nations for example ourselves or the us or other European nations to provide that tactical support now where it comes to military capabilities of individual countries you're not going to find that written down somewhere confidential stuff so you know National Security and so on so forth so we can only take Putin's claims on this at face value but it is certainly true that Ukraine has been supported by the US by the West basically from day one of Russia's Invasion and it is also true that Ukraine has been on a consistent and permanent begging bow mission of help the whole way through cash ordinance all being supplied pretty much no questions asked because it's Russia so I find Putin's claim here to be credible even if you can't just take his word for it he's not trustworthy whether it's true or not in actuality whether it sounds plausible or not and let's face it he is a politician as much as anything else and we're so accustomed to them lying as inevitably seems to be the case that David Lamy or someone else pops up to specifically deny this point would you be more inclined to believe him anymore than you would Putin because I'm not so sure I would be so sending the missiles and saying they can't be used or they can be used in Russia is bad enough in an obious s that in my view passes the declaration of war remid the possibility of NATO Intelligence being used to guide said missiles compounds that the fact NATO intelligence operatives would be required to provide that compounds it even further but it isn't in itself the Difference Maker here however you look or however you choose to look at Russia May what they may do next it is without doubt an escalation by the west and all the while Vladimir zalinski is stamping his tiny feet demanding the West makes its mind up faster over whether or not they are actually going to confirm this course of action and officially give him the green light to do all of this because they know it is crossing a line they know it is a direct escalation and of course this also confirms to my mind that Ukraine really is nothing without its Western B ERS waiting as it is to move against Russia because without them zinski is never going to do it but he will winge and whine about it as he's taken to Twitter to do saying Putin interprets delays in helping us and in making strong decisions for Ukraine as permission to do whatever he wants what zalinsky has wanted for some time is for more Nations to be drawn into this conflict much as Israel is trying to draw more Western countries into their conflict with Gaza for a wider scale War there as well you can debate the merits and moral r s of each action is different but the result is the same it will all result in further escalation of Warfare when only negotiation brings about peace and it's peace we should all actually be striving to achieve if the West is so averse to going to war with Russia and there are plenty of good reasons to avoid it they should frankly stop poking the bear and firing these missiles into Russia will be well like taking a very big stick and given that bear less of a poke and more of a caning but the bear has Got Claws and a swipe at the UK with them would that not surely follow it's not as if we haven't given Ukraine enough already of course after Kier starmer AKA sir kid starver announced that the two child benefit cap was staying and he announced at the same time that3 billion pounds in Aid every year for as long as it takes to Ukraine would follow suit and then just this last week as pensioners lose their Universal entitlement to the winter fuel allowance starma gave Ukraine almost half of the saving from that cut as well gone to Ukraine too get the details of this latest Act of austerity to provide for Ukraine as it seems to be the case in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch and I'll hopefully catch you on the next bed cheers folks