The Royal Appointment: Queen Elizabeth’s Misstep, King Charles and The Sussex Tour

it is time for the Royal appointment before I get started an update on the author of that piece who as we know left the Royal appointment so that she could take over as head of marketing for her uncle count chakula good news they've gotten out early this year noticeably absent was her serial Carmel creeper I can't make this up apparently her Soulful snake has got some serious attitude gave her a snake as a pet are you trolling us last week's were appointment did something that I haven't seen before to the piece it's the first time that Harry and Megan have done a tour without any mention or tie into to the British royal family is it that or is it how the British media writes about their tours in context with the British royal family in honor of that the reporter is going to break down this visit by King Charles to Southport with Harry and Megan's tour two separate entities will not be compared hey I see you girl thanks for watching let's go we got bad news according to the piece Queen Elizabeth made a rare error during her 70 plus year reign that King Charles has corrected you're thinking this is in reference to the BLM movement or the riots in the early 2010s tricks are for kids is that a competitor no obviously we're talking about white people's according to the reporter you have to go back over half a century to find the only time that Queen Elizabeth made a rare misstep in a knock on Queen Elizabeth but we still haven't gotten to the point yet where we can actually analyze and look at her Reign and and make some actual critique of it now remember critique isn't necessarily criticism M but nobody is perfect you have to go back to Aban South Wales where the worst mining incident in British history occurred Queen Elizabeth was criticized and rightly so in my opinion because it took her 8 days to actually go and visit the site of the incident if we're just going by numbers it has actually taken King Charles longer to go to Southport and meet with The Grieving families and survivors talk to the Imam of the local mosque about the riots it's telling that the author had to go back more than half a century back to an event that while there are obviously socioeconomic factors at play it's not one that involves that race religion some might call that intersectionality a lot of the recent events and riots are fueled by the anti-immigration sentiment that is pushed by the Tories through legislation on TV by conservative Talking Heads and also in some major British newspapers it seems like the lesson that was really learned here was one of public relations if you've worked with the spin doctor in the 9s to grow and improve your relationship with the Press they will not hold you accountable and ask questions about why it has taken so long or why you haven't spoken out against rides because they really don't care they're acting as PR what it shows to me is that if you show up in a timely manner whatever that means the substance of what you've done doesn't actually matter the Sussex tour in Colombia is not that noteworthy except for this part that the author writes this is all related to the lack of access andess actual press pool that accompanied the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on this tour she writes quote sometimes a picture speaks a thousand words but sometimes the best way to speak for working Royals former working Royals and those they hope to help is to just speak yes because I'm sure that if members of the royal Roa went on this tour we would see pieces of substance not pieces about body language or cost of Megan's dress yes I'm sure that the message of the Torah and the serious talking points would come shining through any article produced it also completely misses why they left working Royal life which was they were not getting that kind of coverage by the British media there was a lot of lies and insinuations and they were supposed to play along because nobody at the palace was going to protect them here's my other issue with that statement how can you write that about Harry and Megan and not write about King Charles's inability it seems to speak up loudly and boldly against xenophobia anti-immigration sentiment all of it because an argument could be made that the British royal family silence especially as they are supposed to be the best of Britain they are supposed to be a Guiding Light in Hard Times They Are Falling woefully short when it comes to marginalized people because it seems like they can't find their voice when it comes to things that impact marginalized communities papers like the telegraph can't hold Charles to task about that because it would also be an indictment in this case of the very paper that they write for how do you write an article praising King Charles's Interfaith healing and ignore the work of your very own paper and what it has done to divide people to Fan these Flames for the bottom line I'm going to give this Royal appointment a solid C minus there weren't a ton of comparisons and I do like how you broke things up keep doing that but there was also a lot of hypocrisy