Trump answers whether he will debate Kamala Harris or not

>> Laura: HERE IS MORE OF MY INTERVIEW WITH FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP. >> Laura: THEY ARE ALSO ATTACKING YOU FOR OTHER RIDICULOUS REASONS. THEY ARE SAYING THAT YOU SAID TO THE CROWD OF CHRISTIANS THAT THEY WON'T HAVE TO VOTE IN THE FUTURE. >> YEAH. LET ME SAY WHAT I MEAN BY THAT I HAD A TREMENDOUS CROWD, SPEAKING TO CHRISTIANS. I MEAN, THIS WAS A CROWD THAT LIKED ME A LOT. I THINK I'M IN 97% OR SOMETHING. AND THEY ARE TREATED VERY BADLY BY THIS ADMINISTRATION, OKAY? CATHOLICS ARE TREATED UNBELIEVABLY. THEY ARE LIKE PERSECUTED. AND IF I MIGHT SAY BEFORE I GO INTO THE OTHER, JEWISH PEOPLE, IF YOU ARE JEWISH AND YOU VOTE FOR BIDEN OR THE DEMOCRATS OR KAMALA OR WHOEVER IS GOING TO RUN, I GUESS IT'S GOING TO BE HER. BUT, IF YOU VOTED FOR HER OR THE DEMOCRATS, YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR HEAD EXAMINED BECAUSE NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN TREATED SO BADLY BY THIS -- THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DESTROYING ISRAEL. ET CETERA, ET CETERA. SO, WITH RESPECT TO LIKE A STATEMENT LIKE I MADE, THAT STATEMENT IS VERY SIMPLE. I SAID VOTE FOR ME, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE TO DO IT EVER AGAIN. THAT'S TRUE. BECAUSE WE HAVE TO GET THE VOTE OUT. CHRISTIANS ARE NOT KNOWN AS A BIG VOTING GROUP. THEY DON'T VOTE. AND I'M EXPLAINING THAT TO THEM. YOU NEVER VOTE. THIS TIME VOTE. I'LL STRAIGHTEN OUT THE COUNTRY, YOU WON'T HAVE TO VOTE ANYMORE. I WON'T NEED YOUR VOTE. >> Laura: YOU DON'T MEANT YOU HAVE TO VOTE FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE FOUR YEARS IN OFFICE? >> LOOK, CHRISTIANS ARE KNOWN. DO YOU KNOW WHO ELSE DOESN'T VOTE? GUN OWNERS DON'T VOTE. >> Laura: JUST TO BE CLEAR, WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THOUGH, IT'S BEING INTERPRETED AS YOU ARE NOT SURPRISED TO HEAR BY THE LEFT AS WELL THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER ELECTION. IS HE SAYING. >> FIRST TIME I HAVE EVEN HEARD. >> Laura: CAN YOU RESPOND TO THAT. >> I SAID CHRISTIANS, STARTED OFF BY SAYING JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND, YOU NEVER VOTE, CHRISTIANS DO NOT VOTE WELL. THEY VOTE IN VERY SMALL PERCENTAGES WHY? I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE THEY ARE DISAPPOINTED IN THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING BUT FOR A LONG TIME. I SAY YOU DON'T VOTE. I'M SAYING GO OUT. YOU MUST VOTE. NOVEMBER 5TH IS GOING TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY WHETHER YOU VOTE EARLY OR NOT WE SHOULD HAVE BY THE WAY ONE DAY VOTING. WE SHOULD HAVE VOTER I.D. WE SHOULD HAVE PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP. AND WE SHOULD HAVE PAPER BALLOTS, OKAY? THAT'S WHAT WE SHOULD HAVE BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT I SAID TO THE CHRISTIANS IN THE ROOM. THOUSANDS OF THEM. I SAID TYPICALLY CHRISTIAN DOES NOT VOTE. WHY IT IS, I DON'T KNOW, YOU ARE REBELLIOUS. SOMETHING IS GOING ON. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE FUTURE. VOTE ON -- YOU HAVE TO VOTE ON NOVEMBER 5TH. AFTER THAT, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT VOTING ANYMORE. I DON'T CARE BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO FIX THE -- THE COUNTRY WILL BE FIXED AND WE WON'T NEED YOUR VOTE ANYMORE BECAUSE FRANKLY WE WILL HAVE SUCH LOVE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO VOTE ANYMORE THAT'S OKAY. I THINK EVERYBODY UNDERSTOOD IT. I DON'T KNOW THERE WAS ANY. >> Laura: BECAUSE IT'S THE CONSTANT REFRAIN, AFTER THEY HAVE DONE ALL THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT. >> HORRIBLE. >> Laura: ALL THE THINGS. >> RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA. ALL THE THINGS. >> Laura: DUMPED THEIR GUY OF 52 YEARS DUMP HIM TO THE SIDE. THEY DO ALL OF THAT. YOU CAN'T VOTE FOR HIM BECAUSE HE IS LITERALLY NEVER GOING TO LEAVE OFFICE. THEY ARE ACTUALLY STILL SAYING THAT. >> IT'S JUST UNBELIEVABLE. >> Laura: BUT YOU WILL LEAVE OFFICE AFTER FOUR YEARS. >> BY THE WAY DID I LAST TIME. I KEPT HEARING IS HE NOT GOING TO LEAVE. IS HE NOT GOING TO LEAVE. LOOK. THEY'RE THE ONES THAT ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY. NUMBER ONE THEY HAD AN INCOMPETENT MAN AS PRESIDENT. OKAY? NOW THEY HAVE SOMEONE WHO IS WORSE. SHE IS SORT OF INCOMPETENT. NOT VERY SMART BUT VERY RADICAL. VERY RADICAL. SHE WILL TRY AND DEFUND THE POLICE. >> Laura: IS SHE MORE OF AN EXTREMIST THAN MOST AMERICANS TODAY STILL UNDERSTAND? >> THAN BERNIE, THEY SAY MORE THAN BERNIE SANDERS. >> Laura: HE ENDORSED HER. >> BERNIE SANDERS IS A MAJOR LUNATIC. SHE IS WORSE THAN BERNIE SANDERS. NOW, SHE IS TRYING TO COME BACK. SHE GOT RID OF THE LAUGH. I HAVEN'T SEEN THE CRAZY LAUGH. THAT'S CRAZY. THAT LAUGH THAT'S A LAUGH OF A CRAZY PERSON. SHE IS NOT USING THAT LAUGH ANYMORE. SOMEBODY CONVENTIONED HER DON'T -- JUST DON'T LAUGH. DON'T LAUGH. UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BECAUSE YOU. >> Laura: I LIKE LAUGHTER. >> NOT HER LAUGHTER. >> Laura: CLAIMS SHE IS TOUGH ON CRIME. SHE WAS A TOUGH PROSECUTOR. NEVER THE BORDER CZAR. >> SHE WAS A BAD PROSECUTOR. SHE PUT -- SHE WAS A PROSECUTOR OF BLACK PEOPLE. SHE PUT THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF BLACK PEOPLE IN JAIL OVER MARIJUANA BUT WHEN IT CAME TO BIG CRIME, MURDERS AND EVERYTHING ELSE SHE WAS WEAK. SHE WOULD LOVE TO GO AFTER TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP. DID I NOTHING WRONG. THEY DID A LOT WRONG BUT I DID NOTHING WRONG. THIS WAS A TOTALLY MANUFACTURED DEAL. THIS WAS AN ATTACK ON A POLITICAL OPPONENT. AND SHE WAS INVOLVED IN THAT WITH BIDEN. AND SO FAR IT'S BACKFIRED BECAUSE PEOPLE KNOW, THIS WAS AN ATTACK ON A POLITICAL OPPONENT. SHE WAS A BAD PROSECUTOR A IN SAN FRANCISCO, SHE LED THE CASHLESS BAIL AND ALL OF THE DIFFERENT THINGS, SHE WAS THE FIRST OF ALL OF THE BAD PROSECUTORS THAT HAVE ALLOW WANTED. YOU KNOW, IF YOU LOOK AT THE 25 TOP CITIES, BASICALLY ALL DEMOCRAT, THE PROSECUTORS ARE WEAK. SHE WAS THE EARLY, SHE DESTROYED -- SHE IS A SAN FRANCISCO LIBERAL. >> Laura: THEY ARE PUSHING FOR DEBATES WITH YOU. IT WENT DOWN IN FLAMES WITH THEM LAST TIME BUT THEY THINK THEY ARE GOING TO GET YOU. SO YOU HAVE BEEN KIND OF A LITTLE UNCLEAR ABOUT WHETHER YOU'RE GOING TO DEBATE OR NOT. WILL YOU COMMIT TONIGHT TO DEBATING KAMALA HARRIS? >> SO I LIKE DEBATING. I LIKE DEBATING. I HAVE DONE A LOT OF DEBATES. I HAVE WON THE DEBATES, THEY SAY I WON THE ELECTION BECAUSE OF THAT I DON'T MIND, THEY WERE PUSHING FOR THIS EARLY DEBATED. I SAID WHY DO WE WANT TO DO AN EARLY DEBATED? IT DIDN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME. TURNED OUT I WAS RIGHT. THERE ARE REASONS. I WANT TO DO A DEBATE. I ALSO CAN SAY THIS. EVERYBODY KNOWS WHO I AM. AND NOW PEOPLE KNOW WHO SHE IS. SHE IS A RADICAL LEFT LUNATIC. SHE WILL DESTROY OUR COUNTRY. SHE WANTS OPEN BORDERS. >> Laura: WHY NOT DEBATE HER? >> BECAUSE THEY ALREADY KNOW EVERYTHING. SHE WANTS TO DEFUND OUR POLICE. SHE WANTS NO BAIL. SHE WANTS NO CASH. YOU JUST -- YOU KILL SOMEBODY AND WE ARE GOING TO RELEASE YOU MILD. THEY CALL IT CASHLESS. CASHLESS, THAT'S BY THE WAY THIS HAS BEEN A HORRIBLE THING FOR OUR COUNTRY, THIS HAS BEEN WHAT I JUST SAID. BUT, WE KNOW WHERE SHE IS. SHE WANTS HIGH TAXES. >> THEY ARE GOING TO SAY YOU ARE AFRAID OF DEBATING HER THAT'S WHAT THEY SAY. >> THEY SAID THAT WITH BIDEN TOO I WAS AFRAID. DID I GREAT WITH BIDEN AND DID I GREAT WITH EVERY DEBATE. I HAVE HAD A LOT OF DEBATES. >> YOU ARE WINNING ON ALL THE ISSUES, RIGHT? >> I'M LEADING IN THE POLLS BY I THINK A LOT. I DON'T KNOW, I HEAR DIFFERENT NUMBERS. I'M LEADING IN ALL OF THE POLLS. I'M LEADING BIG IN ALL OF THE SWING STATES AND I SAW. THIS YES, I WILL PROBABLY END UP DEBATING. I THINK ACTUALLY THE DEBATE SHOULD TAKE PLACE BEFORE THE VOTES START BEING CAST. YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU -- I HAD A VERY GOOD SECOND DEBATE WITH BIDEN. I REALLY BEAT HIM BADLY, THE PROBLEM WAS 30%, 440% OF THE VOTES ARE ALREADY CAST. IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A DEBATE DO IT BEFORE THE VOTES ARE CAST. I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU DO THAT SO THE ANSWER IS YES. BUT I CAN ALSO MAKE A CASE FOR NOT DOING IT. ALSO, I DON'T LIKE REWARDING FAKE NEWS. I DON'T LIKE REWARDING THE PEOPLE THAT -- THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WITH THIS DEBATE. I DON'T LIKE ABC. I THINK IT'S A TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE OUTFIT. I DON'T LIKE THAT ABC IS GOING TO GET RICH, GEORGE SLOPDOPOLIS. SUCH BAD PEOPLE. >> I DON'T LIKE THAT ABC IS GOING TO GET RICH. I DON'T LIKE -- I WILL SAY SOMETHING WHEN CNN DID THE LAST ONE, THEY WERE VERY FAIR. THEY WERE -- JAKE TAPPER WAS VERY FAIR. >> Laura: MAYBE JUST YOU AND HER -- YOU AND VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS IN A ROOM TOGETHER WITH NO MODERATORS. >> I DON'T MIND THAT I DON'T MIND ANYTHING. LOOK, WE CAN DO ANY FORM OF A DEBATE. YOU KNOW, WHEN THEY ASKED ME TO DO THE DEBATE. THEY DIDN'T THINK I WAS GOING TO DO IT. THEY OFFERED ME THE TWO HEADS, THE TWO ANNOUNCERS, WHATEVER YOU WOULD CALL THEM, THE REFEREES CALL THEM WHATEVER YOU WANT. BUT I HAVE TO SAY THEY WERE BOTH VERY FAIR. IT WAS CNN, THEY WANTED TO SIT DOWN. I SAID NO, I DON'T WANT TO SIT DOWN, YOU CAN'T SIT DOWN. THEY WANT TO SIT DOWN. THEY OFFERED ME EVERYTHING THAT I COULDN'T ACCEPT AND I ACCEPTED IT. I ACCEPTED EVERYTHING. AND WE HAD A DEBATE. IT WAS A GREAT DEBATE. IT WAS ACTUALLY MAYBE IT WAS A MISTAKE. MAYBE I SHOULDN'T HAVE DEBATE SOD WELL. IT WAS THE END OF HIM BECAUSE FROM THAT DAY ON YOU COULD SEE THAT HE WAS NOT GOING TO BE -- IN MY OPINION, I SAID I DON'T THINK IS HE GOING TO MAKE IT ANYMORE. NOW I HAVE -- I WOULD RATHER RUN AGAINST HER THAN HIM. I THINK SHE IS EASIER THAN HE IS. BECAUSE HE HAD A CERTAIN -- I ALWAYS FELT. >> Laura: SCRANTON JOE. >> I ALWAYS FELT HE WAS ININCOMPETENT. HE HAD CERTAIN BASE. NO MATTER HOW BAD HE WAS PEOPLE ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR HIM. SHE DOESN'T HAVE THAT BASE. >> Laura: COMING UP, WHAT DOES FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP THINK OF TH