Republican group cites notorious Dred Scott ruling as reason Kamala Harris can’t be president #1857

hey everyone welcome back to the channel these oldtimers are trying to bring back slavery on some stupid ass 90-year-old National Federation of Republican assemblies nfra cited the 1857 Dread Scott Supreme Court decision to State Harris cannot run for president per uh the con per the Constitution of the United States according to the independent so no wonder why they not like us the truth shall set our black asses free when day today I've got a fascinating and somewhat controversial story to dive into this gone blow your socks off right in front of your very eyes let's talk about the national Federation of Republican assemblies or nfra and their recent challenge to vice president Kamala Harris's eligibility to run for president now ain't that some out the dark web the NF is basing their argument on the infamous 1857 Dread Scott Supreme Court decision well negro slaves aren't part of the United States The Dread Scott ruling stated that enslaved people weren't citizens I knew it just satire guys the nfra claims that for someone to be a natural-born citizen eligible for the presidency their parents must have been US citizens at the time of their birth this interpretation leans heavily on a strict reading of the Constitution influenced by the views of justices Scalia and Thomas two old racist ass Pricks but it doesn't stop with Harris the NF extends this argument to other candidates like Nikki Haley and Vic ramaswami who were also born to n noncitizen parents according to the nfra this would disqualify them from appearing on the presidential ballot this uh stance has sparked a lot of controversies many legal Scholars and commentators are rejecting the nf's interpretation there's my white brothers stepping up to the plate in the face of humanity they argue that the 13th and 14th amendments passed after the Civil War War fundamentally changed the definition of citizenship and overturned The Dread Scott Decision well thank you Jesus so in their view individuals born in the United States are considered natural born citizens regardless of their parents citizenship status wait so we back in the game black people The Dread Scott case held that African-Americans whether enslaved or free could not be considered US citizens I'm more confused than a runaway slave damn it where's my lady Harriet Tubman this decision was widely condemned and contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War Dam Skippy let start another one suckers we got Crips and bloods now the 13th amendment abolished slavery and the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States effectively overturning The Dread Scott ruling come on now new thinkers are amazing critics of the nfra say that their Reliance on The Dread Scott case is not only inappropriate but also deeply flawed the case has been universally rejected as a shameful episode in American legal history using it to challenge a candidate's eligibility is seen as a cynical attempt to exploit a dark chapter for political gain legal experts argue that the nf's interpretation of natural-born citizen is overly narrow and ignores established legal precedent the overwhelming consensus among constitutional Scholars is clear if you're born in the US you're a natural born citizen Natural Born Killer if you from South Central like me while the nfr's uh challenge to Harris's eligibility is unlikely to succeed in court it raises significant concerns just some more for us to talk about critics worry that the group's tactics and willingness to use discredited legal arguments could contribute to the spread of misinformation and undermine confidence in the electoral process never believe everything folks on these channels not even my sometimes this controversy also highlights the ongoing debate over immigration and citizenship in the United States The nf's Stance reflects a strict interpretation of citizenship laws which some argue is out of touch with the country's diverse population and history of immigration so what do you think about the nf's challenge and their use of The Dread Scott ruling is this a genuine legal argument or just political maneuvering let me know in the comments below thanks for watching and don't forget to hit the damn subscribe button for more updates on political news and Analysis catch you in in the next video love all humanity and your family