Donald Trump LIVE | Trump News Conference LIVE | Trump In New York | Trump vs Harris Debate | N18G

suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name where was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds were the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened to at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere although probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the erson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby night basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over turn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate po workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by EG e Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh Eng Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very concerned very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most uh highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer Fraud's uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much small we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both want credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allow allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote czy judge calib Breezy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mura that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations M demeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and gotten the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I am end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at CU it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Camala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the cas is of disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God Sav the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Cas and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody than Mr President which again lacks any indicaa of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of president Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think the political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in Tota when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political support ERS of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and daas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Camala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile a I and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about them I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is the woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton press she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passeng are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying this story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because she can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or five% republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leads no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maral Lago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name where was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything year years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was a very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very sir they Ed that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial break and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not a up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that that be S of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this cuz she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said theyd say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over 10 yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carrol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress egene Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da brag office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's financially this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer Fraud's uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much small we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put him together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean in shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes why did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like 89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experience if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the pellet division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that are mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we wanton them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again any indic of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considered in uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in da A's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Camala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of judges that I think Affair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from at the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the D o j Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge and gorin uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the White House and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Berg off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her where words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class Accord to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1970 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story of a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grabb her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she is gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York buildings I was at very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica Leeds no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know thing about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything already told this story cuz this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate Silvera very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rigged judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress so the Monica Linsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they use that dress to try and intimidate me they Ed that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere Al though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all Democrat appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they' say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to haveen many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by eege Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress egene Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 19 79 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh and Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to S I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also in coordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett that some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calibrii judge calib brezi that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mha that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorneys allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it cuz I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Don of Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five over returns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe a higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indicia of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining Ean Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawful unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS andas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the do J and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just say for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think of fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the '90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge engoren the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get 3 or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story and fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he' rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The artart of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carrol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in for of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where i' I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York buildings I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica Leeds no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maral Lago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maral Lago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife for myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes up a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to people magaz there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you are some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way cuz they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last8 years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate s silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome Rigg judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudgel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with the stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the erson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brak and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outtakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but the president of the United States sir this is is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Canon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam cam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and Weissman and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those riffs and everything and said they' say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over 10 years yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning yall my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by eege Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carrol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh Eng Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to S I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settle the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew M darthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calaby that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mha that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a nonexistent expired long expired by the statute limitations Mr demeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're a basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Cala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Don of Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the cas is of disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself self we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God Sav the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that were talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody thank Mr President which again lacks any indicaa of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this impr ER propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major democ R donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining egene Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be C excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in Tota when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS ndas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge andoran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about them I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the triail which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story and fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Bergs off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words it's because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1970 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because she can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again and she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York buildings I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armor rest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica Leeds no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maral Lago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name where was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maral Lago this woman this writer or whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds were the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that this same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rigged judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't fren at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anyway although probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well and until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brak right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brak and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's Neath The Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had it thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby night basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over turn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia were talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witness have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of EEG Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that EEG Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent it and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds Cas never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's financially this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also in coordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calaby that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement was somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had to today uh downtown uh I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $ 89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at cuz it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experience if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded it because of incompetent people like Camala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we want them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with eege Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody than Mr President which again lacks any indicaa of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary ofid president Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that We Believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and daas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen it anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody is ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonnie uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way sh a or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is law order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way Clinton Press she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1979 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the order the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and P Messengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with there what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leitz no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's say her name where was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and leads with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away a couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last 8 years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said every everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome Rigg judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Linsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very they use that dress to try and intimidate me they Ed that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudgel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial break and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's is not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be S of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had ion judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this cuz she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over 10 yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress egene Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh Eng Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an exp expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud say think of it cons consumer Fraud's uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to set I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calib brezi that quote on cases and they I mean in shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mia that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-is agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it cuz I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like 89 million dollar and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases say case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylum traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Cala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is is there hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the loyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with eege Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indic of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining EEG Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire law and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress egene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple coup of Judges that I think AFF fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta funny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top oper ative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story and fabricated 100% that I attacked her at bergd Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton Press she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1979 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury where you have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where were we going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leits no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was a very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very f famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was C crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maralago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview view I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was no yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told the story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate Silvera very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rigged judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they used that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudgel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere Al though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brak right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outtakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't n able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be so of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Canon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more doc doents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over turn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season I last coach in basketball to have many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a witch on just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about president president Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that EEG Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh then in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to this State as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much small we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do was what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the Great greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mura that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called reliance on attorney you have a reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people ing into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like commala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper cuz in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Don of Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one and peachman hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil is often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Cas and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody thank Mr President which again lacks any indicia of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from Crossing examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and daas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other tr so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran ran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal deal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonnie uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get 3 or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge Eng Goran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story and fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Bergs off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they call told me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the order of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying this story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leits no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I wru don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into marago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole grp group and crew who should be sued by the way cuz they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rigged judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest H with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they Ed that dress to try and intimidate me they used that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudle they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it a try then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere although probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the erson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States St sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Canon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those riffs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturned yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to have many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will Shar to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country's in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by eege Carol now it's really important to remember that Eugene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that eege Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh Eng Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted settled the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much small we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mura that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bed publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the peachman hoax number one and peachman hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe a higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indicaa of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be C excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS Nas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happen happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think of fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she know was it in the 9s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge andoran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for in New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Bergs off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her where it's because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1970 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carrol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because she can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where i' I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica Leeds no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maral Lago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name where was who swoff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maral Lago this woman this writer whatever ever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maralago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes up a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a uh Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudgel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere although probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Canon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and the playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby night basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision over turn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Taven many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate poll workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by EEG e Carol now it's really important to remember that eege Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that EEG Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress EEG Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conserv very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most high highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to set I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settle the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much small we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote Cali Breezy judge calab Breezy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge mha that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations Mr meanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of their those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at cuz it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Camala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the cas is of disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on The hoax that we're talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Cas and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody than Mr President which again lacks any indicia of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of president Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining EEG Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political support ERS of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just ask for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile a I and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about them I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Bergs off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department store I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton press she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passenger are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying this story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or five% republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leads no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's say her name where was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything year years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was a very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than just picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal tent but legal Talent cannot overcome rigged judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very they use that dress to try and intimidate me they Ed that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere they probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brak and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately where do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not a here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that that be S of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby KN basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they' say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overt yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball Tav many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attor attes today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by eege Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that eege Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da brag office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds because he never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to sett I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put him together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calib brezi that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same cas and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experience if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and the this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Cala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the pellet division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that are mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody thank Mr President which again any indic of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considered ing uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress eene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in da A's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Camala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Jud judges that I think a fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta funny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin brag that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something thing in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because was I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be so her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1979 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly are is for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury where you have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight with where were we going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leits no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name what was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writ or whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for people magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story cuz this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way cuz they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that go after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her they the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very Ser they use that dress to try and intimidate me they Ed that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial break right now we're going then she came back from commercial break and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge J judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outtakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately where do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to is it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be S of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would want not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and white men and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this CU she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overt yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to have many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a witch on just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President trumps attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about president Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims then in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me that likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calib brezi judge calib brezi that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on an attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it cuz I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like 8889 million and wouldn't have two cases it should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we want them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is there hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable Sue all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indic of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's liberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other w es on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial fact we were prevented from cross-examining egene Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in Toto when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress egene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and daas who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China in China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote WR a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just ask for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellate lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from the say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the '90s could it have been further than than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta funny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republic Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with and Goran I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department store I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir you nor about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we had asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1979 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury where you have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where were we going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leits no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps per it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two Witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me in anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but your writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack cuz I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online a celebrity but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very Ser they used that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere Al though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brak right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we were weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be S of bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Canon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was in competent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justice is because they think they're going to intimidate him I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to have an many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing the Riff when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egyp Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that eege Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a court room utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress EEG Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh then in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put them into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's financially this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to S I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number uh this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of the things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mia that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag nam Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at cuz it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Camala that doesn't want to do one interview she just One softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sloads and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of meran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge and Goran just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we want them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene care she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue them all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indicia of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political foe in adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress egene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS andd who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again uh that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers of the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just ask for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hosle like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story and fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department store I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's amazing up fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is the woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 197 9 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 1979 it's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying the story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carrol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury where you have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica leads so she she was up again can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where were we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York buildings I was in very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leads no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who sworn off yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and leads with the two witnesses the only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senl worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but your writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate Sila very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it I'm not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but his fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on Page Six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew I had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudgel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brank right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outtakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be s a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate him I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing the ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coached to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to have many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recus impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate at people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's a it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that egene Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce it Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stof uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress eege Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh the in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh en Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is at General but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's Financial this was an expert witness for from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to S I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interest interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected not knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett that some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly resp respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mia that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a SLE bag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a nondisclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so so that's where we are we have a corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place that took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because their best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of mad the cas is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge engoren just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with EEG Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody Mr President which again lacks any indicaa of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory testimony from other Witnesses or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining egene Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's Del ation in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully unconstitutionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse use of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butress egene Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with president Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge Lewis Caplin angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just ask for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think they whole thing it's I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the doj Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4% like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge engoren uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never SE anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the White House and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy African-American and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at berol Goodman you know it's very interesting I I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know some time after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough now so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for for years saying this story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in her life she gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury where you have three or four or five% republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in Planes back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flight I was a New York guy Building New York building I was at very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica Leeds no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful Story You've everever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who sworn off yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maralago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senle worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired he was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maral Lago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told this story CU this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew who should be sued by the way because they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because you can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked in into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome Rigg judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Le type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s then they use that dress to try and intimidate me they use that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brank right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the out takes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately what do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for a consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first trial my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be such a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in anyway was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and and there has to be fairness shown our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate them I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturned yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball having many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer uh but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will sharf to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that eege Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of eege Carrol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that EEG Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorney attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress egene Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instructive here this is a woman who claims uh the in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh and Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's financi this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a 400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I said I I'm not going to said I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for much more smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also incoordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened and when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calzy that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it cuz I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certain wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad public it we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers two everything is really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really bad you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers which by the way that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible and it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced if you look at Aurora Colorado they're taking over the place they took over buildings and there this is just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet you have haven't seen any they've allowed well over 20 million people in my opinion I other people say well it's only 13 no no it's much more than 20 I think it's much more than 20 our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't want to do one interview she M does one softball interview with CNN couldn't have been nicer Dana Bash you know what I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper CU in my interview with sleepy Joe I thought they were very fair actually I was surprised they were very fair I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC George sload dolos and that group and ABC I think is the worst of everybody I think they're the worst they're the nastiest they're as as bad as you can be they're worse than NBC which is saying a lot and we have something coming and the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only one that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News and her husband's best friend is married to that one so and Donna Brazil is there you remember the famous Donna Brazil she gave Hillary Clinton the questions you remember that that was a little embarrassing she got fired I assume for that but now she's working at ABC so I said I'll do it anyway because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions I don't think she'll be very good and this is not what our country wants and I feel I have an obligation to do it and she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system this is the weaponization of Justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before we've never seen it you see it in third world countries you see it in banana republics but you don't see it in the United States of America and it's a very sad thing and I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because you know it came out with a indictment from the district attorney which again just revealed today and I hope you're going to do a story because it's a big story the southern district of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people uh he said it was a disgrace that that case was brought it was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of Muran the case is a disgrace should have never been brought should have never been brought and the case in front of Judge andoran just in terms of the case itself we had four or five overturns in the appell division I only hope the appell division for the good of New York other words you just say God saved the state for the good of New York I hope that the appell division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam but every single one of these cases that I'm mentioning they're all hoaxes and scams no different than Russia Russia Russia Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine the impeachment hoax number one impeachment hoax number two all these things that we won we won them all but it takes time it takes effort and they're at it again but this time what they're doing is they're hitting us uh as hard as possible you know it's very interesting it just brings to light uh the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with egene Carol she said the way to defeat Trump is go after him civil as often as possible make his life miserable sue him all the time keep him in court and let him spend a fortune that's the lawyer I have in the egene Carol Case and that's exactly what they've done the only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands and my poll numbers I believe are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax it's a scam it's a political Witch Hunt and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves thank you very much everybody thank you Mr President which again lacks any indicia of reliability uh any sort of credibility any sort of uh confirmatory uh testimony from other Witnesses uh or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened so on the one hand you have a judge who allowed in uh this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in in our view that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury uh of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should uh should not have been considering uh and we think that absent that propensity evidence no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case and as a result we believe uh that this verdict needs to be overturned but there's more than that in addition to this improper propensity evidence president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross-examining eege Carol and other Witnesses on crucial issues crucial issues in particular relating uh to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit this is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway a longtime political Foe and adversary of President Trump this is a lawsuit that was funded by Reed Hoffman a key political Ally of the Biden Harris Administration and a major Democrat donor we were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts we were prevented from cross-examining egene Carol on aspects of that that Dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict I think this political coordination point is particularly important though it's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden Administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully uncons tionally interfere with President Trump's core First Amendment right to run for president that is a right guaranteed to him by the Constitution that is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him we have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives uh have underlay what should be S excuse me serious legal proceedings and I think when you look at this situation in TOA when you look at what the left when you look at what the Biden Harris Administration is attempting to do to president Trump this is insane this is an absolute abuse of our legal system it's an absolute abuse of the rule of law it should be deeply offensive not just to political supporters of President Trump uh but to each and every American with respect to today's appeal we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here we we are hopeful that the second circuit uh understands what occurred during this trial which was an improper use of evidence to butus eege Carol's entirely meritless claims on the one hand and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict thank you thank you very much good afternoon I've done this one too many times actually too many times for the last three and a half years while President Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back and I want to speak to the American women and I want to speak to the people that need to get out and vote in November 5th I have sat with President Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges AGS and da who have specifically run in this city and others on getting Trump the Trump Administration will fix this problem we will stop Camala Harris's regime because she was there let's not forget forget that and she still is of using officials from the White House putting them in DA's offices in AG's offices and attacking your political opponent and this country deserves better than this we do we should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this we did this in 2016 and every woman had no reports they come out when it's election time and as a woman who has stood with President Trump who has spent extensive time with President Trump and with his beautiful family I will tell you that is not president Trump and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person his family and the Trump organization that we stand in right now you must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney as a woman as a mother our future of this country depends on it and we need to stop this from happening the doj is supposed to help our country and protect us not attack us because you cannot win in the polls thank you thank you very much both and uh just in finishing this uh we have numerous other Tri so thank you very much everybody for being here this is a long and complicated web and story but it all goes back to the doj and Cala and sleepy Joe and all the rest of them uh we have a whole rigged election system nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening now I understand yesterday they're bringing up Russia Russia Russia again that they've done for years never found any anything uh but they should be looking at China China China Iran Iran Iran in lots of other places uh I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years they know that but it's a scam but it all goes back to the doj because uh we had a trial today it's an appeal of uh a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met I don't know I have no idea who she is she wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up she put it in her book and we're now appealing the decision we had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton very good friends of Clinton uh I guess he married uh presided over the marriage ceremony of one of the lawyers on the case against us and uh it's very sad judge lwis Kaplan angry man he was so angry I went to the trial I've been in a lot of litigation over the years I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw one of our attorneys in jail who was threatened her with jail nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing nobody's ever I've never seen such anger but all of our judges I mean we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida I think we have another judge who's very fair I just ask for fair I don't want anything different from anybody else I just asked for fairness we have another judge or couple of Judges that I think are fair then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace the uh case that we met on today and then we're going to talk about uh job numbers which are horrible by the way horrible like really bad and you know that I'm sure you won't report on it but the job numbers are terrible uh we're going to talk about the appeal today we had a great appellant lawyer go down representing us and uh I think John did a very good job you have a matter of minutes to speak it's a very complex thing because it was a setup a rig deal uh they had two witnesses and before I start I have no idea who this woman is they have a picture from they say about 40 years ago a picture and the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity I was been a celebrity for a long time and they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people nobody even knows where it is uh the problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident she doesn't know when she doesn't know was it in the 90s could it have been further than that she has no idea when and people do that because you don't want to give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe so they tend to do that they take long periods so that this way hopefully he was in New York at that time but this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of the United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again and this is being worked with the do J Department of Justice as are all of these cases they all come out Atlanta fonny uh that is all Department of Justice nobody knew that uh the case with judge Ang Goran the most overturned judge in the state that is very close because they sent their team from the doj to help him the district attorney Alvin Bragg that was all worked with again they sent a top operative from the Department from the doj Department of I call it the department of Injustice because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign these cases are disgraceful now they're B brought for the most part in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get three or 4 perc like downtown Manhattan in front of very hostile judges like hostile like you wouldn't believe judge meran judge andoran uh and judge Kaplan all of them hostile areas and uh very very hostile judges I've never seen anything like it and very bad thing in this case New York very bad thing for New York businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge engoren I can tell you that and probably the rest of them also so but this case involved a woman who wrote a book and I guess she said something in the book that's when I first heard about it I first heard about it in the white house and of course I denied the story because it's not true I have no idea who the woman is and I never met her now I don't know about a picture that was taken 40 years ago with her husband on a celebrity line so I don't think that counts but as far as I know I never met her I never touched her uh I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way shape or form uh her husband was a news anchor actually John Johnson a very nice guy she called him horrible things we weren't allowed to say that in the trial she said horrible things about him I guess they're since divorced uh he's a very nice guy africanamerican and she said very bad things we weren't allowed to use that in the trial which surprised a lot of people but she made up a story it fabricated 100% that I attacked her at Berg off Goodman you know it's very interesting I don't think they were allowed to use this either her favorite show is Law and Order and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department so I don't know if they use the name of the store but that's her favorite show Law and Order she said that and anyway this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth we were called I was in the white house and I said no it never happened I didn't even know what they were talking about this was I think I was in the Oval Office sir do you know anything about this and this had to do with a book and she had a few pages in a book making this claim by the way there was never a claim there was never a police report there was never anything mentioned there was never publicity 30 or 40 years ago whenever it took place nobody knows she doesn't know when it took place when did it take place she has no idea she thinks it was in the 1990s she thinks it was in the 1990s and the judge we had two trials we asked for consolidation he said no the reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me very bad because I'm running for president and this is not the kind of publicity you like and whether it's true or not it's horrible and in this case it's so false it's a madeup fabricated story by somebody I think initially just looking to promote a book and when they called me I denied the story got essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right I should be suing her for defamation so that's where it is now there were two witnesses one is a woman who's followed me for years uh she said in 1979 I was in an airplane with her commercial flight and we became very intimate I just sat down I I think I had the book The Art of the deal I was famous then too I've been famous for a long time and we're sitting in first class according to her never happened by the way totally madeup story she's a Clinton person too by the way big Clinton person she made up the story and so many years ago and I think it would be 1979 one of my many people behind me could correct it but I think she said 197 that's a long time ago and I sat down I believe I had some pretty big success then and I was being talked about a lot maybe the art of the deal was out you know sometime after that I'm not sure but I was well known and passengers are coming into the plane and she said I was making out with her and then after 15 minutes and then she changed her story of a couple of times maybe it was quicker that I grabbed her at a certain part and that was when she had enough so think of how the impracticality of this I'm famous I'm in a plane people are coming into the plane and I'm looking at a woman and I grab her and I start kissing her and making out with her what are the chances of that happening what are the chances and frankly I know you're going to say it's a terrible thing to say but it couldn't have happened it didn't happen and she would not have been the chosen one she would not have been the chosen one she has gone around for years saying this story everywhere I go she says this story and it's a total lie now I assume she'll sue me now for defamation like I got sued by Ean Carol who interestingly said she's been hurt damaged but she's made more money since she did this than she ever made in a life gets paid a lot of money to go talking bad things about me so remember this this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because she can't talk of Harris and Joe Biden this was election interference it all is it's all fabricated but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them if you get a jury it's very hard to win in a jury we have three or four or 5% Republican votes very very tough actually two witnesses one is named Jessica Leed so she she was up again she can't get rid of her she was up she said I was in an airplane doing that a couple of things you have a an armrest in plane back in those days oh by the way she didn't know anything about the flight where we were going where I I was in very few flights I was a New York guy Building New York building I was at very few airplanes I will tell you in those days 1979 I think it's a long time ago but you had the armrest and in the old days they didn't move okay but she said she then got out and she went to the back at the plane and that was the end of the story I think and this story has followed me for years but just to finish with her Jessica leads no police reports no Witnesses no corroboration of any kind no criminal suggestions no nothing then you have another one and this one is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice she came to maralago and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen it was a love story about Melania and myself a love story in People magazine and that was it it was a cover I think but it was a beautiful story you would everybody would love to have that marriage she said the nicest things about me about Milani you have the story I mean you can read the story and her name was whoever let's see her name was who soroff yeah I don't have it whatever her name was I don't know the lady so perhaps it's much better that way but I really don't know the lady so she wrote this beautiful story and about I don't know years later no police reports no anything years later the same person they called up did you attack at maral Lago this woman this writer whatever her name is and she was a witness in a case her and Leeds with the two witnesses only two witnesses did you attack her I said' who is she and they said she writes for People magazine I said I don't know anything about the lady if I had a story long ago years before about people but it was very nice story so I don't know has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about it turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her now think of this oh and she said the butler knew everything the old expression the butler did it right very famous in crime stories well the butler was Tony senal worked for me for a long time he was at he was retired at that time that was years later he retired was at retired when this hoax came out and what happened is he totally confirmed my story and he didn't even work for me anymore he passed away couple of years ago a good man he said the woman was crazy it never happened I was the one that served her whatever they she was drinking and I was there and nothing ever happened but you don't need the butler all you have to do is read the story think of this a woman comes into maralago interviews me about a love story story about my wife and myself and during that interview I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently okay and then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story a perfect story she doesn't mention the event again there's nothing on file at all zero there was no complaints there were no complaints to People magazine there was no witness there was nothing yeah well there was a witness the Butler and he's already said everything he's already told the story because this story likewise like Leeds this story has followed me around I could go through many many other stories outside of this you know it's very funny when you're rich and famous you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories but you're writers and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't some of of you are fake news and some of you are real news but put yourself in my position I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out and they have fake cases and they report back to doj and you have Lisa Monaco one of the people at doj who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia Hooks and yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew should be sued by the way CU they're not a charity all they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years I mean he's a sick person that runs that too but Lisa Monaco is in the department of justice but she's a Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years so far he's failed and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls I guess if you look at the uh Nate silver very respected guy I don't know him but he has me up by a lot so let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference I'm in the race it's between two people but I think we're Le a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk and uh they're not going to skate through it we're not going to have a Marxist president the people are getting it so we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam and all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture which could have been AI generated I don't know showed up out of nowhere but it's fine nice picture with her her husband and lots of other people are online it's a celebrity line but never met her never touched her never had anything to to do with her the other thing is I was very famous then if I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman the department store that she said everybody would have said oh there's Trump and it would have been at that time on page six page six was the equivalent of today's internet and it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store gone into a dressing room and supposedly you know what to her never happened never happened total phony story and I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it I have all this legal talent but legal Talent cannot overcome rig judges they can't overcome a 4% Republican area and I'm disappointed in my legal Talent I'll be honest with you they're good they're good people they're talented people today at the uh trial they didn't mention the the dress So the Monica Linsky type dress was a big part of the trial big big part of the trial I said why didn't you mention that and I heard there was a dress involved and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her never never touched this woman saw this woman knew had no idea who she was but they have a dress sir I said so what well sir it's very s they used that dress to try and intimidate me they Ed that dress with the public that dress was such a famous dress it was Monica Lewinsky part two the dress and the judge wanted it for trial and it was going to go into trial and then they found out there was nothing on the dress which I knew and then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used so they used it as a cudel they used it as a hammer over my head and then the judge when he heard that it was it showed totally negative totally negative the judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial then there was an Anderson Cooper interview well she said essentially no he didn't rape me she was selling her book she wrote a book the book would have been a total failure probably was anywhere Al though probably sold more recently again there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with this stuff about me and that's happened to others too by the way um she's not the only one but they have the Anderson Cooper tape and in the Anderson Cooper tape it's an interview of her and Cooper says something to the effect did he rape you did he rape you he was so happy oh did he rape you and she gave a very good answer for me but a bad answer for CNN for Anderson and he said uh we're going to commercial Brak right now we're going then she came back from commercial Brank and she was much more hostile but this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper uh questions having to do with the tape wouldn't let us the judge judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used we wanted to get the outtakes in other words what did Anderson Cooper talked to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately why do you see this I mean some of you have seen it some of you haven't we're going to commercial break right now and so what happened is we weren't able to use it the other thing is we had not one trial we had two trials nobody understands why we asked for consolidation and I wanted to show up to the trial to the first my lawyer who's not up here not with us any longer sir you should not show up you're the former president or the president I don't even know when when the trial was but you're the president of the United States sir this is beneath you I've got this 100% the dress is negative but he wasn't able to use it sir it's beneath you to show up I said but wouldn't that be bad for a jury wouldn't that be s a bad for a jury if I don't show up he said sir you don't have to show up I've got this you shouldn't do it it's beneath you it's beneath the Office of the President I understood what he meant by that and so I didn't show up and I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen touched or in any way was involved with nor would I want to be I would not want to be my people say please don't say that I would not want to be involved with her and that's where we are so we're appealing it and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments but you'll look that up yourself but I hope they understand this is the Office of the President of the United States and there has to be fairness sh our court system is looking so bad if you're a Democrat these are all democrata appointed people Biden Clinton I think others three people they seem very good today and I mean they seem absolutely fine but uh I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels I don't get friendly panels but where we've had Fair judges where we've had brilliant judges frankly I I don't know the judge in Florida judge Cannon don't know her at all but um I think she's a brilliant woman I think she handled a scam it's a scam case that's the documents case that's case where Biden who had 10 times more documents took all this stuff for years 50 years and he was exonerated of course they said he was incompetent so he wasn't fit so he was exonerated based on that but me I don't get exonerated so easily and I had a thing called the presidential records act which exonerates me but we won that trial and the other side plays The Ref crew and weissan and all these people and again Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years and now she's like the second person at the doj but she's with all these people and they're playing The Ref and they say terrible things about Judges they do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're going to intimidate him I think it should be illegal that's what the doj should look into the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them it's called playing The Ref nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach he would play he would scream at those refs and everything and said they say Bobby you're not going to get the decision overturn yep but the next one I will and he was right he was a great basketball coach last coach to have an undefeated season last coach in basketball to have an many years ago he also endorsed me but he played the ref these people are playing The Ref when they are allowed to call for recusal impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way and for some reason the other side doesn't do that they don't do that the other side is much softer uh Republicans play it a lot softer but they're they play it legitimately so I'm going to ask uh if I might will Shar to come up just say a couple of words about what took place today one of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case remember it never happened it was made up for political reasons and the doj is behind everything every one of these cases it's political interference it's a Witch Hunt just like the fake Russia Russia Russia scam was a Witch Hunt and just like they want to start that scam All Over Again by announcing that Russia Russia Russia we're talking about and you know what they do when they do that they intimidate people from having a fair election they intimidate pole workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election and it's it's a disgrace our country is in serious trouble our judicial system is in very serious trouble uh will please come up thank you thank you Mr good morning y'all my name is will sharf I'm one of President Trump's attorneys today we presented oral argument before the United States court of appeals for the second circuit in one of two cases brought against President Trump by egene Carol now it's really important to remember that egene Carol's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said she said story there is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about President Trump there are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to there is not confirmatory DNA no police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident she was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently no surveillance evidence or Witnesses have ever uh been found or come forward confirming any aspect of egene Carol's story in light of that in light of the utter implausibility of the story that eege Carol was attempting to sell to the jury in this case her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom utterly uh in insane uh efforts to introduce propensity Witnesses Jessica Leeds and Natasha stoff uh most notably in an unfair and improper effort to butress egene Carol's failed attempt uh to assault president Trump uh Jessica leeds's story is instru here this is a woman who claims uh that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979 uh president Trump assaulted her Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from where it went to uh the date of the flight in question uh making our efforts to disprove her testimony uh extremely difficult under the federal Rules of Evidence uh this story should have never uh very much in coordination with the doj they actually took just about their top person and they put him into the offices of the Attorney General of New York and then also the office of the da da Bragg's office to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent and it's a shame it's a shame businesses will not come to New York because of it they actually in the case of uh and Goran they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this and not only were my numbers correct and again this was a generality all you need is a general but I I had really good numbers but they were very conservative very very much on the low side and the judge knew that and the judge ruled a fine against me the likes of which has never even been heard of businesses will never come to the state as long as that is able to be held up uh because we won that trial so conclusively we had an expert witness said that President Trump's financi this was an expert witness from the stern School of Business one of the most highly respected people in the country as an expert witness he said to the best of my remembering it's a big statement but he said this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen but the judge made me pay like a $400 million fine this is a Consumer Fraud statement think of it cons consumer frauds uh case that they made it in the judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever the judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount and I Saidi I'm not going to S I didn't do anything wrong but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount he wanted to settle it for a much more we had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave that was one of the interesting things I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for which was a very small number by comparison and then he just came out with this number this was a coordination with the doj and the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about which is same kind of a thing also in coordination is the brag case and they actually wanted to put them together in New York they wanted to put the da case together with the attorney general case but they both wanted credit they couldn't understand you know they they both wanted credit so they had their own cases and it's very corrupt in New York and very very corrupt it's a very corrupt place and doing very badly but when people see what happened And when they see oh I've had so many calls from business people saying this is just terrible uh today there was a story about somebody in southern district who's highly respected knocking the hell out of both of those cases say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought and I'm going to write out a list of things from Alan dtz Andrew McCarthy uh Greg Jarrett the some of the the greatest uh people uh all legal all legal Scholars great people uh Jonathan Turley like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that quote calzy judge calibrii that quote on cases and they I mean shockingly they can't even believe it they said this case should not have been allowed to be brought and that's about pretty much both cases but it's about the case that we have in front of Judge Mera that case is a disgrace should have never been allowed I did nothing wrong and he took a non-existent expired long expired by the statute limitations misdemeanor he made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony nobody can even believe it and if you look at that case he wouldn't allow it that whole thing was done by an attorney I had nothing to do with it that was done by an attorney a sbag named Michael Cohen and he did the whole thing and you're allowed to have Reliance on attorney it's called Reliance on attorney you have a Reliance on attorney attorney's allowed to do things and all it was is a non-disclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened by the way I might add that if you don't mind I'll add that we have a statement nothing happened and he got a non-disclosure agreement he did it on his own and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense the attorney client defense which is very standard other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it but he's the one that did it because I was running for president and running the country he's the one that did it so all of these cases are a disgrace but the case that we had today uh downtown I wish we could have mentioned the dress again got the idea from Monica Lewinsky but it was negative wasn't allowed to be used I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes What's called the outakes what did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial I'd love to find that out so that's where we are we have a very corrupt system of laws but in that system we have some very good judges also and I think in the end the good judges will prevail and I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story probably out of Law and Order I don't know she made it up out of somewhere but check out the Law and Order episode that we're talking about make up a story and I end up getting sued and by the way the punishment is like $89 million and wouldn't have two cases should have been one case but two cases is better because you get double bad publicity we asked the judge could you consolidate the cases same case and he refused to do so he wanted two cases so two cases two sets of lawyers to everything it's really really very disgraceful let me talk about uh job numbers because as you know they just came out and they're basic disaster they are really they are really you had numbers that are shocking native born Americans we lost 1.3 million jobs while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs so foreigners coming in illegally largely illegally into our country took the jobs of native born Americans and I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums traffickers human traffickers women traffickers sex traffickers