Trump attacks Project 2025 author and opposes Florida's abortion amendment

Robert Kennedy says that Trump criticized the project 2025 author by calling him an in a private conversation together he also says that we will see a very different Trump in the next Administration and as you'll see in the video This is actually positive for conservatives because Kennedy describes how the trump in the first Administration made bad hires which led to bad appointments with within the federal government and it looks like according to Kennedy that is Trump has acknowledged his mistakes and knows who to work with going forward if president Trump wins um that people are going to see very different president Trump than they did during the first term um I think he's changed as a person uh and I've known him for you know 30 years I've sued him I've litigated against him and and had a friendship with him even when I was litigating against him and by the way successfully against him U but I I think he is um he's focused on his legacy he said many interesting things to me about what he did wrong the last time and about how he filled his you know he had no idea he was going to win he had no idea how to govern and people descended on him the day that he got elected and said you got to appoint this guy appoint this guy and he said you know I I appointed a lot of people I should appointed I know who they are now he also said something interesting to me he said uh is the Democrats one of the big sort of fulgums of their Terror of trump is that he's going to implement this Heritage Foundation you know uh blueprint which is called uh project 2025 and he brought this issue up to me and he said you know they always telling me I'm I'm from Project 2025 I never read project 2025 until they start accusing me of it he said I was written by a right-wing ass this what he what he said he said there a leftwing ass and there was there rightwing ass and it was a rightwing ass who wrote that thing and then he started going through it so I you know I think there there's a lot and I think he's interested in his legacy now he wants to leave behind some accomplishments and he wants to make our country better and I think he's um you know he's listening to a wider range of voices and has he's preparing to govern right now and you know I'm going to be on the transition committee picking the people who are going to govern told he's going to be that there's going to be a wide diversity of of stakeholders but he's listening to more than just that kind of narrow right-wing band that people are terrifi be look I'm glad that we're going to make America healthy again and investigate the cause of chronic disease but listening to a bunch of liberals is not a good idea because Liberals are wrong liberals have a bad understanding of how humans act and Liberals are again largely not aligned with our interests they will help make Society better in some cases but in other cases not so much so again this is one one massive criticism of the Trump campaign this time around that he is he is I think intaking too much information from liberals who he shouldn't be listening to as much while it's good to campaign towards the middle and get voters to believe that you're going to be a common sense moderate those that you need to win over ultimately that's not how his governing philosophy should follow he should listen to the authors of project 2025 because it's not that bad it's just fine of a generic generically conservative document a lot of the policy positions out there are perfectly perfectly I mean they're frankly popular amongst generic conservatives the and the Democrats manufactured this massive uproar against project 2025 because they didn't really have nothing much at the time this was around the Trump assassination attempt it seems as if Trump had all the momentum and they just they clung on to this opportunity and they pretty much kept their grip tight around this Narrative of project 2025 it's effectively the Boogie a boogeyman that these people manufactured out of thin air Trump also had no association with project 2025 as he described today beforehand and he didn't look into it until after he was being criticized for going for for for going to implement it in his next term and on top of this project 2025 nonsense it looks like Colorado particularly Aurora Colorado is being overrun by uh drug cartels and South American gangs so this incident really shows how much the Democrats and leftists Hate hate America right they just they have no desire to conserve anything about America and America is quite good actually so and they don't like it they don't like who America what America is or what it had been in the past obviously much of America's traditional principles have long been eradicated but drug South American uh gangs and drug cartels are now part of the future of America America and they will continue growing in prevalence if the Democrats continue to be in power Aurora Colorado mayor thank you very much for for coming on with us um it seems it's tough to even get some confirmation of the details of what is going on there first off um can you confirm whether or not this Gang has taken over these buildings there in Aurora so there are several buildings actually under the same ownership out of state ownership uh that have fallen to these GS uh I'm trying to walk it back and do the and do the investigation as to how the V there's concentration of Venezuelans uh uh in these these three buildings U um somebody put them there and somebody funded it uh whether it's federal government or not we're trying to find out who these gangs apparently are attracted to where there's a concentration of of uh Venezuelan migrants and so uh they've in fact have kind of pushed out the property management through intimidation and then collected the rents we have now um or have had uh it is ongoing um uh operations uh with uh a task force of local law enforcement State uh law enforcement partners and federal law enforcement Partners uh to R the mar and in and arrest have been made but these operations are now are still ongoing with the arrests that have been made are these confirmed gang affiliated members you know they um this is an organized criminal effort whether it's trendee aragua uh that remains to be to be seen but it really doesn't matter I mean if they're if they're you know Venezuelan migrants and they and they're conducting crime and an organizing they were problem so okay so you're able to confirm that they this this Venezuelan Venezuelan Gang has indeed taken over at least some of the buildings you're saying at least two of the three and what I just heard from you is you don't know how they ended up there and you even made a suggestion that they could have been sent there by by like by federal officials I heard you suggest okay so we understand the point so this these gangs from South America over through the property management in these buildings they're owned by owners who are not in Colorado or in the vicinity of the property so the so the gangs show up overthrow the property management and then start collecting the rent and this is exactly what happens in in these third world uh dumpsters and of course the Democrats want to turn the United States into a third world dumpster and the problem with that you know there's a lot of problems with Democrat policies but the problems with importing a bunch of gangs and turning America into a third world dump is that it's hard to reverse those policy when a new Administration takes place when a new super strong Administration that wants to do everything right takes takes office it's still going to be difficult to reverse the damages caused by all this kind of mass migration again that's why Mass migration is such an important issue it's because once something happens this is going to be largely irreversible once the gang show up it's again going to be difficult to deport all these criminals and people generally who don't belong and there's going to be a lot of health risks associated with mass migration right on the street vending is associated with an increased risk for disease particularly when it's unchecked and when it's not regulated by a health entity there's going to be increased rat of homelessness and again that's bad for communities there's going to be an absolute higher rate of drug usage right because while immigrants may or may not increase rates of particular negative instances they do increase the absolute frequency that these negative occurrences happen and that is also bad even if the rates aren't necessarily increased and Donald Trump clarifies his position from yesterday saying that he thought a six week ban on abortion was too restrictive restrictive he says today that he is voting no on Florida's abortion uh on Florida's Amendment 4 which which would enshrine abortion essentially up until birth and this amendment enshrines abortion up until birth pretty much through vague language suggesting that abortion is allowed up until viability and that's another topic because abortions near the term of viability are still radically extreme and Trump should not support abortion that is near viability either however the amendment would allow for an elective abortion to take place if the recipient's health care provider deems that her health is at risk and that's pretty much all we know that's the extent of the language that is used to either authorized or neglect abortion up until birth the patient's Health has to be at risk and the who determines that is up to the health provider of the patient so the government is not involved effectively two parties the patient and the provider could determine that the abortion can take place up until birth post viability so this is a radical um Amendment and and Trump does take the correct position after some blow some blowback however in the original clip he said he was against the six week um abortion ban he said that was too restrictive he didn't actually come out and directly endorse the amendment and clearly here he says he's going to vote no so this is the correct position and he does describe in the video why he's voting no the amendment is radical As Trump says disagreed with that right from the early primaries when I heard about it I disagreed with it at the same time the Democrats are radical because the 9 months is just a ridiculous situation that where you can do an abortion in the ninth month and you know some of the states like Minnesota and other states have it where you can actually execute the baby after birth and all of that stuff is unacceptable so I'll be voting no for that reason