Health Canada knew of contamination issues in Pfizer’s shots but rubber-stamped booster doses anyway

newly released Health Canada emails show that the agency sought guidance from fiser on impurities discovered in the novel mRNA shots and scrambled to unify messaging across Regulatory Agencies when the public became aware of this contamination as news swirled about DNA contaminants and the undisclosed presence of a plasm DNA called the sv40 promoter in fizer's novel mRNA co9 injections Health Canada sought clarification from fiser on the products that they are responsible for regulating these emails were obtained through access to information requests to determine how and when Canada's drug regulator became aware of these undisclosed contaminants which included large amounts of residual DNA despite this health Canada repeatedly assures Canadians that these shots are safe and effective the vaccines are working in a remarkable way they have been very effective and so I had never dreamt as I said one year ago that we'll be an position where safe and effective vaccines are available to everyone um I also think that uh one of the most important ways you can contribute is that you can be vaccine champions my repeated queries to health Canada to determine the risk benefit analysis used to justify that claim remain unanswered and the access to information request that I filed in May of 2021 requesting the calculation remains outs standing 3 years later in an email sent July 23rd 2023 from Michael wall biologist and evaluator at Health Canada he asks for clarification from fizer on squits analysis of plasmids and the presence and purpose of the sv40 promoter including a bunch of redacted sentences he also seeks clarification on the size analysis performed on the residual DNA contaminants by the beginning of August it was determined that this contamination was still present in the xbb 1.5 booster injection that fizer was about to seek authorization on by the end of August Dean Smith immunologist and Senior scientific evaluator of vaccines at Health Canada wrote a followup to an ad hoc Cluster meeting arranged between himself the EMA that's the European medicines agency and the US FDA Smith wants to add the sv40 topic to their discussion as an FYI as to what they plan to do asking if they The Regulators are all on the same page this is a public topic now and we are approaching the next vaccination season for these vaccines he's quoted as saying which at least hints at the fact that the agency is concerned and of course does not want to compromise that safe and effective narrative as the boosters roll out someone from the EMA responds saying that they would be fine to discuss this but wants to consider that the FDA dropped a number of other very relevant topics from the the agenda someone from the FDA also thanks stean Smith for facilitating a global discussion among nraas that's the national regulatory authorities it's probably important to point out here that NRA are The Gatekeepers of medical products they have a mandate to ensure the quality safety and efficacy of medicines vaccines blood and blood products and medical devices if they are discussing safety and efficacy concerns then one would think that they should be obligated to inform form the public who not only funds their salaries but also that same public that they are meant to keep safe Dean Smith brought this conversation forward on August 23rd he says that he understands there have been internal discussions regarding the presence of an sv40 enhancer promoter sequence noting that its presence is unrelated to the purpose of the fizer's plasmid as a transcription template for their mRNA covid-19 vaccine fiser has communicated to health Canada recently that they apparently chose not to mention this information to the EMA the FDA or health Canada at the time of their initial or subsequent submissions however as of April this year information was independently made public which has resulted to questions coming to the agencies indeed that was my interview in April with genomics expert Kevin mccaran who was sounding the alarm on this undisclosed plasmid the email continues at Health Canada we do not view this as an urgent risk topic however given the fall covid-19 vaccine ination campaigns it may be useful to be on the same page on this topic between agencies time permitting a brief exchange at the end of tomorrow's Cluster meeting could also help inform potential exchanges between agencies and fiser on the sv40 topic as well as future actions we may collectively consider taking subsequently to encourage fizer to remedy the situation prior to a potential fall 2024 covid-19 vaccine campaign it would be unfortunate if the information circulating had a negative impact on public acceptance of the vaccine this year or in the future what would be even more unfortunate is if the health Fallout from these novel injections were catastrophic when harms could have been prevented by these various Health Regulators doing their jobs they attach a preprint from mckernan's paper sequencing balent madna and fiser mRNA vaccines indeed the meeting titled vaccine cluster took place on August 24th between the FDA Health Canada and the EMA all of the titles of those in attendance are outlined but their names are redacted except for health Canada co-chair kofam the executive director after the meeting Dean Smith relayed that fizer replied and acknowledged minimal risk but we're not allowed to know the rest because it's redacted when it came to the sv40 sequence apparently fizer didn't commit the three agencies did not want to tell fizer about their Cluster meeting because the Pharma oligarch does not seem to care but why would fiser care the manufacturer liability was waved for these novel products so that they could be rushed into the market and into the arms of Canadians including babies and children and fizer has been paid billions with an approximate 185 million doses delivered to Canada by the end of this year even receiving a premium of tax ta payer dollars for their mRNA products visor got rich and is not liable for the Fallout so why would they be concerned and why would they care according to these emails Health Canada says they will continue to work with International Partners to remove the sequence elements from the plasmid for future strain changes on September the 5th 2023 Dr Tong wo submitted fizer's quality evaluation executive summary seeking authorization for the xbb 1.5 booster formulation to Dr Co fam the summary specifies that fiser has requested approval by mid-september 2023 and they must commit to providing additional data characterizing the size distribution of residual DNA fragments and residual intact circular plasmid by December 1st 2023 as well as provide a certified product information document when it becomes available Health Canada issued a comment that is for information purposes only and a formal response is not required at this time to remind fizer of their obligation to report the following comments are for information and a formal response is not required at this time the sponsor is reminded of the obligation to report oos that's out of specification results for ongoing stability monitoring of community vaccines yet in that same package on the very next page it notes that stability data for this injection aren't available due to the expedited development of the Omicron xbb 1.5 vaccine as these novel balent booster injections were being authorized Ana email from Tong woo to kofam said that these commitments and comments are not considered critical to product quality please review the qes that's quality evaluation executive summary and let me know if you have questions SL comments there is no tnc's that's terms and conditions for this nds-r submission for covid as the commitments SL comments are not considered critical to product quality I guess product quality isn't of high Assurance when the background itself said that says that the Omicron xbb 1.5 was developed to prevent covid-19 caused by infection with the SARS Cove 2 virus and yet real world data all along has showed that these injections are ineffective at doing just that in spite of all of this health Canada rubber stamped the xbb booster on September 28th 2023 less than a month after fizer submitted their request for author authorization why is there much more reductions as my colleague said in these documents than in other documents it's because these documents were signed at the beginning of a pandemic when everybody was desperate for vaccines when companies were being told to rush vaccine production do testing in a unprecedented way in a way they normally don't do it so these companies were exposed to way higher liability putting their products on the market than they normally would because they didn't do the type of testing that normally takes these drugs years to come to Market they did it all in less than a year so that's why these companies said if I'm going to deliver you this product that I haven't tested in my normal way I I want to have different conditions there was a summary of key quality issues but it's redacted so you're not allowed to know what the issues are those responsible for the review were Elizabeth Davis as the first reviewer and Michael wall as the second the reviewers required a submission review which had the quality review report but they did not require a DMF a drug Master file review consistency testing an osc an on-site evaluation or anything else so by October the EMA was going to discuss the sv40 and DNA contamination issues being disclosed and discussed by Third parties with fizer and they asked for health Canada and the fda's perspective or if they took any action they'd apparently been contacted by different media and fact Checker groups from the US so they're seeking an aligned position to navigate the communication challenge in response to health Canada asking for residual DNA and plasma clarification fiser attempts to Gaslight the health agency they claim that the data are not readily available and require time to generate asking Health Canada to note that to date they have not been requested to provide these characterization data across Global markets All Along The Regulator asserts that there is minimal safety risk and that these elements are nonfunctional yet they list no references for these assertions some notes were taken from what appears to be a discussion with sapria Sharma the chief medical adviser to the deputy Minister and Senior medical adviser at Health Canada where it was stated that it was unexpected to find the sv40 promoter sequence in the injections because fizer didn't disclose it by the end of October last year the agency was scrambling to have internal meetings about this and then especially when conservative MP Ted Faulk filed an order paper question in the House of Commons asking about health Canada's authorization of the fiser injections and the disclosure of contaminants now stay tuned for a follow-up report where I break down even more of these emails with genomics expert Kevin mckernin who is responsible for the independent scientific investigation that discovered these previously undisclosed plasmids in the first place for Rebel news I'm tamary ugolini [Music] if you'd like to learn more about these novel injections you can visit our special website at no more shots doca there you can also send an email to Federal minister of Health Mark Holland calling on him to revoke Market authorization for these injections all of that and more and to support this work head on over to no more shots.com