"It's OUTRAGEOUS!" Police Corruption in Karen Read Case- Mark Bederow

but going back to these celebrate records is this the same thing as like that when they gray keia device I have friends that work in the feds and they if they can't get access from Apple they call they gray key something to just get all the access so it's this is standard that these are admissible in court and this is what it is and the pro so you're telling me the prosecutor is saying there's no way that that's that that's that's accurate they're challenging celebrate records that the defense is in possession with that they're going to attempt to say doesn't really mean what it says and call an expert to say for example there is a Google search which is of critical importance in this case where ha die in cold or something yeah well ha yeah it's a typo but how long to die in the cold and that search according to the defense celebrite Records Was Made by Jennifer mccab at 2:27 in the morning now according to all of those people they never saw John O'Keefe they left the home around 1:00 in the morning and learned about this at say 5 :30 in the morning when a frantic Karen Reed was running around saying where's John so obviously if there is a credible argument that Jennifer mccab was searching at 227 a.m. how long to die in the cold mind you four minutes after Brian Albert and Brian Higgins claim they butt dialed each other but nobody picked up the phone for 20 the record show is a 22 second answered call but none of them know just an hour and a half after Jennifer mccab claims that she butt dialed six or seven times John O'Keefe right around the time he was dying and the defense is going to argue they were looking for his phone that's why she was calling him so put that all in context and then if she's after that timeline performing a Google search after this Higgins and Albert call how long to die in the cold when she shouldn't know about this then this case is over if that's a credible Google search it doesn't matter matter what happens after that point this case is over so the celebrate records show that that Google search was made at 227 am and was deleted by Jennifer mccab along with many other calls and texts that she made during this time period now by the way if you look at her call records for uh January 29th of of 22 which would have been those early morning hours after midnight yeah all of her records for those four or five hours are deleted but nothing else so they don't know about the butt dials they don't know about the deletions it's all a mistake and she stood uh in court looked at the jury with a straight face and said I didn't do that I didn't delete anything and the da apparently is going to call an expert who's going to attempt to say you know those records must not tell the full story and again anyone who who does this for a living uh to see that the da is attempting to undo the reliability of celebrite Records which they initially sought we are we are in Bizarro world and you wonder um just if that alone isn't enough to make them wonder and you know there but that's just part of it I mean there's going to be experts who testify for the defense and this is beyond boners you know we know the feds are doing an investigation and as part of that in investigation they retained an independent accident reconstruction firm I mean that's like a cottage industry an expert whether it be car accident cases or vehicular homicide cases so during their investigation the feds wanted to know um you know let's assume that they're agnostic as to what happened so naturally they want to know you know let's see what they tell us so they hire a firm with three different experts who who analyze all the evidence and three out of three apparently come back to them and say that the damage on the car combined with the damage to John O'Keefe's body combined with the District Attorney's theory of her backing into him at this rate of speed and combined with the tail light and all of that that they're not consistent in other words in layman's terms it's in our expert opinion he was not hit by her car three out of three now the defense is aware of this not because they hired a bunch of experts to you know how much to pay to say what we want because the federal government told them they felt compelled as part of the disclosures in fundamental fairness that knowing that she's on trial to let the defense know so now these Witnesses are going to testify for the defense and the prosecution has no expert to rebut this and and the defense is going to establish that these experts they're not going to be able to say that they were part of a federal investigation but they're going to be able to say we didn't engage them for the purpose of paying them for an opinion that you know we learned of them we got these reports after the fact and then they're going to march in these three Witnesses who are all going to say this makes no sense and it's it's easy to understand why because they claim that she backed into him at 24 miles an hour give or take 62 she was 62 feet away which doesn't even make sense to me how she could accelerate in an SUV well not only that but there's testimony about cars were lined up on the side of the street but so you know if you are I mean the medical examiner hasn't testified yet but somehow autopsy photos are out there it's probably shouldn't happen out of respect of course there are of course I mean it is what it is but just you know what's out there is out there and when you look at the injuries to Jon O'Keefe's body um he has a very large probably I'm not a medical expert fatal gash to the back of his head he has his face is bruised his eyes or or bulging he's got a whole bunch of scratches on his arms but what he doesn't have is what appears to be anything that would be that blunt force trauma to you know to cause that it doesn't match the car and he's also missing a belt and the idea being hit by a car at 20 mil an hour if you're wearing a fasten belt that's not going to fly off you um you know you've seen high-speed awful car accidents on the interstate I mean I have seen this stuff unfortunately sometimes you see someone's shoes shoes go flying off but 20 miles an hour uh wearing a fastened Belt doesn't seem believable the other problem they have this being like a modern SUV the the tail light is made of polycarbonate which is tan amount to that shatterproof type of glass it's hard as a rock it doesn't shatter in the classic sense that glass would shatter and and the state police including the expert who has all of these problems not expert the lead investigator who was talking about getting gifts and looking for nudes that guy um and his Department claims they found 45 pieces of shattered tail light on the lawn and I don't think again I'm not an expert that doesn't make any sense that doesn't make any sense at all and look I'm not an expert or anything but but I have a modern vehicle I shattered my T tail and and it's three pieces you would get you would potentially get a Shard I believe you know something like that which they also claim they recovered but I think the point is I assume and I don't know this I'm speculating but it's what I call informed speculation just as you said um basic common sense of analysis that I would imagine that the polycarbonate would factor in to these experts opinion amongst other things that this scenario this hypothesis that's theorized by the da just doesn't wash with the available evidence that would make sense but again you say Common Sense which is something that I think has gone out the window long ago in our society but also in this case apparently okay so talk to me about this lead investigator who is this lead investigator is this the state trooper I I can't recall his name but who this person his name is Michael Proctor and the irony is he became the lead investigator after the local police essentially recuse themsel because of all this incestuous relationships so and didn't Michael Proctor's mother refer to the Alberts as like family to them yeah no they go to weddings together they babysit children and now bear in mind for the better part of almost two years Proctor and the district attorney not not the poor guy who goes to court every day and has to try this case and frankly in my view embarrass himself I'm talking about the elected official have both denied that Michael Proctor had any relationship whatsoever with any of the Witnesses in this case that is patently false the DA has never correct did that they've never been had to stand to account for that it's outrageous