Kamala FUMBLES Easy Interview, STILL No Clear Answers | StateOfDaniel

Kamala Harris' first interview reminded voters  why they elected former President Donald Trump   in the first place. Look, the great thing about  being an independent is that I don't blindly root   for Republicans or blindly root for Democrats.  I can just call things how I see them. And this   highly anticipated interview, Well, it wasn't  the train wreck that Republicans were hoping for,   but it also wasn't a touchdown for Democrats  or a home run for Kamala Harris either. And in fact, I think it's actually going to  be a net negative for Kamala Harris and the   Democrats because Kamala failed to do the two  jobs she had. Job number one, distinguish and   separate her herself from Joe Biden. And job  number two, to paint herself as the outside   candidate. And instead what she did was She again  reminded voters why they elected Donald Trump. She proved that she would be a  return to politics as usual. And,   uh, just the old boring status quo. And you  can tell that she failed based on how the   media is covering her. Here's a look at what  the daily beast said. It's actually a good   thing that Kamala Harris's CNN interview  was so dull. I actually disagree with   their premise here because what their  premises, what they're implying is that. Kamala Harris is dull because  Donald Trump is only exciting   because he's controversial and divisive and  dramatic, and that makes for good TV. Well,   being dull isn't a good thing, like they're  implying here. It's actually a good thing   that her interview was so dull. Imagine  interviewing one of the founding fathers. What if Abraham Lincoln, George Washington,   Thomas Jefferson sat down with a journalist today?  Do you really think that their interview would be   boring? Now, it might not have the bombast  or the dramatic flair that Donald Trump has,   but I guarantee it would be a riveting watch  because of their ideas, because of their ideals,   because of their philosophies, because of their  vision for the country and their conviction of,   uh, making sure that they're able to  carry out that vision for the country. I guarantee none of the Founding Fathers would  ever be described as evil. quote unquote dull.   So I don't think that's quite the defense  that the Daily Beast thinks it is. Also,   uh, the Associated Press went along  those same lines. The interview,   Kamala Harris's inaugural sit down, was the  most notable for seeming dot dot dot ordinary. Again, or like, that's your big selling point.  I'm ordinary. I mean, is that really what we   want in a president? And that, and that's the  false dichotomy that Democrats are trying to set   up here. Right? Because they, they're trying to  paint this picture of Donald Trump is unstable,   dramatic, and dangerous. And on the other  hand, you have Kamala Harris, who is ordinary. Well, shouldn't we want something  more than ordinary in our presidents?   Shouldn't we demand extraordinary? I  mean, that's what we want in a leader,   someone who has a vision, someone  who has conviction. And of course,   we want all of those things to be rooted in the  ideals of our country, rooted in the constitution. But again, I don't think that that's quite  the selling point that the media thinks it   is. Last but not least, The Independent  said Kamala's interview was a masterclass   in dodging traps set by Trump. No, it  wasn't a masterclass in that. It was   a masterclass in just avoiding to answer any  question, period, because that's what she did. I'm gonna go through her interview, clip by  clip, and, uh, just thoroughly analyze it. Now,   to be very clear, um, I'm going to have  to interrupt these clips every once in a   while because YouTube will flag me for just, uh,  reposting CNN's videos. So, before I get comments   being angry that I'm interrupting these videos,  uh, I I have to do that because of the copyright. strike system, and I don't want to get in trouble  on my channel. So here is the very first question   that Kamala Harris was asked by Dana Walsh. She  was asked about what she would do on day one,   and I want you to notice she never  actually answers the question about   what she would do on day one. They're  really eager to hear what your plans are. If you are elected, what would you do  on day one in the White House? Well,   there are a number of things. I  will tell you first and foremost,   one of my highest priorities is to do what we can  to support And strength in the middle class. Um,   when I look at Okay, and here's what  I mean by that. A lot of people,   especially low information voters, and I don't  want to call That term sounds negative, right? Because it implies that they're ignorant.  And they may be ignorant because they're   not watching the news, but most people  aren't political junkies, right? They,   um, They're too busy working and providing for  their families, uh, just to clarify that. But,   you know, she gives this answer, and it seems  politically correct, and it seems very sterile,   and, you know, she, as if she's not  dramatic and not gonna cause trouble,   and a lot of people just think, well,  She's likable, so I'll vote for her. But if you'll notice, she doesn't  actually answer the question. What,   how are you going to strengthen the middle  class? She makes all these promises, but   never digs into the specifics. What specifically  would you do? Does that mean tax cuts? If so,   how big are the tax cuts? Who are the tax  cuts for? Are you going to pass regulations? If so, what are those regulations?  What industries are you going to   bring manufacturing back? How are you going  to bring manufacturing back? How are you   going to entice businesses to invest in the  United States? at the aspirations, the goals,   the ambitions of the American people. I think  that, um, people are ready for a new way forward. Um, in a way that generations of Americans  have been fueled by, by hope and by optimism.   I think sadly, In the last decade, um,  we have had in the former president,   someone who has really been pushing an agenda  and an environment that is about diminishing,   um, the character and the strength of who we are  as Americans, uh, to, really dividing our nation,   and I think people are ready  to turn the page on that. No, that's not true. There is unity in  success, unity in strength, and unity in   America first. Trump has never tried to  divide America. It's been the Democrats,   and it's been the media, who have tried to make  America first. Even his most benign statements,   remotely controversial. Here,  here's the proof, right? Because remember, when Trump first ran, and he  announced that he wanted to build the border wall,   Democrats called it divisive, they said it was  inhumane, they said it was xenophobic and racist,   they attacked him for wanting to build the border  wall. Well now Kamala Harris is out campaigning,   literally campaigning, and saying that  she's going to build the border wall. Where are the attacks on her? Why isn't  the media calling her racist? Why isn't   the media calling her xenophobic? I thought  walls didn't work. I thought walls were bad.   And now Kamala Harris couldn't go out there and  say she's gonna build the border wall? In fact,   Kamala Harris, as I pointed out in a  previous video, she's now using at least,   in three different instances, uh, footage of the  border wall that Trump built in her campaign ads. So, uh, her talking about Trump being divisive and  all of that just doesn't make sense. But again,   the question was, what are you going to  do on day one? She did not answer it. She   provided vague things like, we're going  to strengthen the middle class. Again,   how are you going to do  that? What are the specifics? Give us your policy. Give us the details.  So, Dana Bash asked a follow up question,   and again, Kamala Harris didn't  answer. Again, just more, um,   hope y, change y language. We're going to make an  opportunity economy. Well, what is an opportunity   economy? How do you make an opportunity economy?  How is that different from what we have now? Here's a look at that. So what would you do  day one? Day one, it's going to be about,   one, implementing my plan for what I call an  opportunity economy. I've already laid out a   number of proposals in that regard. Um, which  include what we're going to do to bring down,   um, the cost of everyday goods, what we're going  to do to invest in America's small businesses,   what we're going to do to invest in families. For example, extending the child tax credit to  6, 000 for families in the first year of their   child's life to help them buy a car seat,  to help them buy baby clothes, a crib. Um,   there's the work that we're going to do  that is about investing in the American   family around affordable housing, a  big issue in our country right now. So there are a number of things on day one.  Yeah, I, I, and, and that too, you know,   Democrats are also giving free housing to illegal,  illegal immigrants. So there should have been a   follow up question on that. What about that?  Um, and that's one thing I want to talk about,   too, moving forward. You'll notice that even  when Kamala doesn't answer, and even when it   looks like Dana Bash has asked a follow up  question, there are so many opportunities for   Dana to have asked more follow up questions,  or, can you specify, can you clarify, or,   let me, Provide a counterpoint and can you,  um, give me a response to that counterpoint? And she doesn't do that. It was a very softball  interview. A lot of the questions were teed up   for her. Um, now Dana asked Kamala about  her statement of we're not going back,   which is really ironic, right? Because during  the DNC, they kept chanting. We're not going   back. We're not going back. Well, Just a few short  years ago, things were better under Donald Trump. We had world peace, no new wars, the Middle East  wasn't exploding, Russia hadn't invaded Ukraine,   they only did that because of the disastrous  Afghanistan withdrawal under Joe Biden,   the economy was roaring, wages were  high, there was virtually no inflation,   the cost of living was down. I mean, the economy  was soaring under former President Donald Trump. And so Danavash asked, Uh, can you  clarify what you mean by we're,   we're not going back? Talk about,  you call it the opportunity, uh,   economy. You are well aware that right now many  Americans are struggling. There's a crisis of   affordability. One of your campaign themes  is we're not going back. But I wonder what   you say to voters who do want to go back when  it comes to the economy specifically because   their groceries were less expensive, housing was  more affordable when Donald Trump was president. Okay, so she's going to just to give you a preview  because I want you to be aware of what she's going   to do here. She starts talking about COVID  and how the Biden administration, you know,   recovered from COVID. And the issue with that is  that President Trump did a great job of managing   COVID. You know, he had the 15 days to slow the  spread and then he did what he was supposed to do. He left it up to the individual states. Because  it's not the role of the federal government to   institute a nationwide shutdown like a lot  of other countries. He let local states,   local jurisdictions, come up with their own plans.  And what happened was, is that radical Democrats,   like in California, exposed themselves as being  radical, and they also exposed their hypocrisy. Gavin Newsom Famously, uh, infamously shut down  his state. Meanwhile, within his own state,   he went to parties without masks. He drank  a lot, went to like, you know, eight fancy   cheese boards, uh, and charcuterie boards  with his friends while he shut down the   state. So the Democrats exposed the  radicalness, exposed their hypocrisy. Meanwhile, Republicans took a more  common sense sensible approach. They   opened up schools before much of the  blue states and, uh, the blue cities,   they opened up their economies. And so  it's unfair what Kamala Harris is about   to say. And then, um, there's, there's a  lie later on that comes about inflation. We'll get into that. Well, let's start with the  fact that when Joe Biden and I came in office   during the height of a pandemic, we saw over  10 million jobs were lost. I mean, literally,   we were all tracking the numbers. Hundreds of  people a day were dying because of COVID. Um,   the economy had crashed. In large part, all of  that because of mismanagement by Donald Trump. of that crisis. When we came in, our highest  priority was to do what we could to rescue   America. And today we know that we have  inflation at under 3%. A lot of Okay,   gonna stop her here and correct a few things.  Number one, inflation at 3 percent sounds great   because it's down from 8%. It's down  from 7%. But Inflation is cumulative,   so what happens is, just for easy math, let's say  inflation, the cost of something is 100, right? Um, let's say inflation goes up 10%. Well,  now the cost is 110. Let's say inflation   goes up 10 percent next month. Well, you're  not taking 10 percent of the original 100.   You're now taking 10 percent of that  new number, 110. So it keeps growing,   growing, growing. Inflation, though,  uh, when she says it's lowered to 3%,   that doesn't mean that, uh, Uh, we've  now gone from 110 for that cost to 103. What she's saying is now, we're gonna  take 3 percent of 110 and add that to   110. So in other words, inflation is still  worse. We're still worse off today and,   and costs are still going higher. So her  phrasing of inflation's down to 3 percent No,   what we want, um, would be, uh, For those  numbers to go back down to their baseline. So that that's not a good thing. Number  two, um, more people died. This is a fact   you can fact check me more people died  under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris than   died under Donald Trump. She wants to talk  about mismanagement. They had the vaccine.   They could have shut down the country.  They could have instituted mask mandates. They could have, and I'm not saying  they should have done that. I mean,   they could have theoretically, you know, um,  but I, again, not saying that they should have,   but. I only want to say that because she  wants to talk about mismanagement. And,   you know, they had more therapeutics, they had  more resources, the hospitals weren't full,   and yet more people died under their  administration than under Donald Trump's. She, she really wants to talk about mismanagement?  Our policies have led to the reality that America   recovered faster than any wealthy nation  around the world. But, you are right. Prices,   in particular for groceries, are still  too high. The American people know it,   I know it. Which is why my agenda includes what we  need to do to bring down the price of groceries. For example, dealing with an issue like price  gouging. What we need to do to extend the child   tax credit to help young Okay, again, she  stole the idea for the child tax credit,   and then when it comes to price gouging,  That's what they do in communist Marxist   countries. Price gouging, uh, controls  have, have never worked in history. Also, she talks about price gouging and  addressing price gouging as if, you know,   the food industry and the grocery industry is,  you know, trying to rip off consumers. Well,   the profit margins in that industry are oftentimes  less than 1%. Grocery stores and food processors.   I mean, it's, on the high end, 3 percent  profit margins, but for most of them, 1%. And she, she wants to accuse them of  price gouging, and she's going to put   price caps on them. That is going to drive  costs through the roof. It's going to put,   uh, grocers and food producers and farmers  out of business. And that would be terrible,   not only for the economy, but  for our way of life in America. Families be able to take care of their children  in their most formative years. What we need to do   to bring down the cost of housing. My proposal  includes what would be a tax credit of 25, 000   for first time home buyers. So they can just  have enough to put a down payment on a home,   which is part of the American dream and  their aspiration, but do it in a way that   allows them to actually get on the path  to achieving that goal and that dream. That right there also will, would just  giving, you know, homebuyers a 25, 000   down payment would only drive the cost of housing  through the roof. Because that doesn't answer,   that doesn't address the core  issue here. The core issue is,   why is there a shorting houseage in the first  place? Why aren't more homes being built? Why are these mega corporations, why are these  mega, Organizations such as BlackRock able to   buy up all this land? Why are they able  to buy up all these apartment use units?   Why are they able to turn, you know, all these  single housing units into, you know, tall and   skinny duplexes and just rent them out? I mean,  there is a huge shorting crisis in this nation,   and that, by the way, has to do, or is a cause  for the rising prices, because what is inflation? Well, it is when, um, there aren't  enough goods, and there's too much money,   too many dollars chasing too few goods.  And she is not addressing, you know,   all the money that's, uh, artificially in  the economy, thanks to Joe Harris's bailouts,   and the lack of supply, the, again,  the lack of housing, the lack of homes. So she would actually make the problem worse  without addressing any of the issues. Now,   one of the issues she did talk about was fracking  in Pennsylvania, and she attempted to deny   that she. Claim that she would  not ban fracking. Take a look at   this. Let me get some clarity on where  you stand on some key policy issues. Energy is a big one. When you were in Congress,  you supported the Green New Deal. And in 2019,   you said, quote, there is no question I'm  in favor of banning fracking. Fracking,   as you know, is a pretty big issue, particularly  in your must win state of Pennsylvania. Do you   still want to ban fracking? Okay, before she  answers, I do want to point out that Dana,   Referred to Pennsylvania as her must win  state as I've been saying Realistically,   whoever wins Pennsylvania will win the  election if Trump wins, Pennsylvania. It is a 93 percent chance He wins the entire  election versus Kamala Harris if she wins,   Pennsylvania, it is a 91 percent chance. She  wins the entire election And the state itself   has a 33 percent probability of being the state  that decides the election one way or another. So,   this issue of fracking is really  important, especially in Pennsylvania. No, and I made that clear on the  debate stage in 2020. That I would   not ban fracking. As vice president,  I did not ban fracking. As president,   I will not ban fracking. In 2019, I believe,  uh, at a town hall, you said, you were asked,   would you commit to implementing a federal  ban on fracking on your first day in office? And you said, there's no question I'm in  favor of banning fracking. So, yes. So,   it changed in the, in that campaign? In  2020, I made very clear where I stand. We   are in 2024 and I've not changed that  position nor will I going forward. I   kept my word and I will keep my word. In  2020, I made it very clear where I stand. First of all, that is a lie. I will expose  that here in a few seconds. But Dana Bash   should have asked a follow up question to  that and really pushed her on it because   that's what a good interviewer does. They  don't just ask follow up questions. They   also push back on statements and provide  counter arguments or again, will push. you previously said this, you're saying this,  these two things don't jive, they don't mashup,   How do you explain that? And, um, you know,  CNN apparently has more footage. This is   a pre taped interview. It was edited.  So we don't know if Dana Bash asked a   follow up question and if they chose to leave it  on the editing room, on the cutting room floor. We don't know that. But I would have asked  a follow up question there because Um,   Kamala Harris did in 2019 say that she would be in  fracking, and then in 2020 she never clarified her   position on it, which she said previously in  that clip. She actually clarified Joe Biden's   position on it because she did that when she  was on the vice presidential debate stage. So she never clarified her position. So the  last statement we have from her is her 2019   position when she said she would be in  fracking. So this is actually CNN. And   that's how you know this interview is  bad. CNN fact checked her on this. Um,   they showed her 2019 clip and then they showed,  um, her in 2020 defending Joe Biden on it. But again, talking about his, his policies  and not hers. This is what it looked like.   The fact check bottom line, Abby, is that  she did not actually make clear at a 2020   debate that she had changed her previous  support for a fracking ban. So let me take   you through this kind of saga. So here's  what she said at a CNN climate town hall. in 2019 on the subject of a fracking ban. Will  you commit to implementing a federal ban on   fracking your first day in office, adding the  United States, the list of countries who have   banned this devastating practice? There's no  question. I'm in favor of banning fracking. Joe Biden will not end fracking. He has been  very clear about that. I will repeat and the   American people know. That Joe Biden will not  ban fracking. Again, there you have it. Kamala   Harris didn't provide her views on fracking.  She was providing Joe Biden's. And that's what,   you know, I'm not criticizing her for  doing her job for defending her boss. That's what she's supposed to do. But  she could have given insight into how   she views it. And if Dana Bash had done  her research and taken a look at all of   Kamala's statements, she would have  known that she could have said, well,   you actually didn't Tell us your views on that  debate stage. You were talking about your bosses. What are your views? Can you clarify? I  really think Dana should have pushed back,   and I really think she should have, uh, tried  to get Kamala on the record. Just being clear,   because Kamala has clearly flip flopped  on so many issues. Now, Tim Walz,   Kamala Harris's support dog, her support  animal, you know, the straight white man,   as Democrats like to say, was with  her, and he performed just as poorly. He refused to answer any questions. And  again, I think most people who don't pay   attention to politics closely, if they  tuned in, they'd be like, Oh, he's fine,   he seems nice, but when you really listen to the  substance, There is no substance there. It is just   intellectual fast food. Um, you had to clarify,  uh, that you had said that you and your wife   used IVF, but it turned out you used a different  kind of fertility in order to, uh, have children. And then when you ran for Congress in  2006, your campaign repeatedly made false   statements about a 1995 arrest for drunk and  reckless driving. What do you say to voters   who aren't sure whether they can take you  at your word? Well, I've been very public,   I think they can see, uh, my students come out,  uh, former folks I've served with, and they do,   they vouch for me, I certainly own my mistakes  when I'm Okay, so, he's gonna continue. But I wanna point out, she asks questions  about, like, you've lied about IVF,   you've lied about all these things, how do you  answer those? And he, he doesn't answer them,   he just says, my students can vouch for me,  people vouch for me, I'm a good guy. That's   all he's saying there. He, he's not answering  the question at all, and that is a fallacy. He's trying to appeal, um, to, uh,  his moral goodness, and his character,   and trying to say, I'm a good person,  and therefore, I would never lie. I, I,   I just have poor grammar. That's why I lifted  my video here, because on the chyron there,   uh, he essentially was, sometimes my  grammar is poor, or whatever it was. Really? He's gonna blame his grammar for  his lies? Just take a look at this. He,   he, he never addresses the question. And it's just  People vouch for me. I'm a good guy. People say   I'm a good guy. The one thing I'll tell you is,  um, I wished in this country we wouldn't have to   do this. I spoke about our infertility issues,  because it's hell, and families know this. And, uh, I, I spoke about the treatments  that were available to us that, that had   those beautiful children there. Um, that's  quite a contrast in folks that are trying to,   uh, To take those rights away from us. And so no  one is trying to ban Iiv. FI, uh, I think people   know who I am. They know that record, they've  seen that I've taught thousands of students. I've been out there and, um, again,  an appeal to party. I won, apologize,   appeal to his character, whether it's guns in  schools or protecting of reproductive rights. Uh,   the contrast could not be clear between what  we're running against the vice President's   position on this has been clear and, um. I think  most Americans get it if you've been through that,   um, I don't think they're cutting hairs on IVF or  IUI, I think what they're cutting hairs on is an   abortion ban and the ability to be able to deny  families the chance to have a beautiful child. Okay, so, well, denying families the chance to  have a beautiful child, that's what abortion   is and that's what you stand for. I mean,  abortion is literally killing a beautiful,   innocent child in the womb when they're  most defenseless. Disgusting. Um, but   next, Dana Bash asked Tim Walls about his, the  stolen valor accusations against him and if,   again, listen closely, he does not ever once deny,  he never denies the accusations of stolen valor. I want to ask you a question about how you've  described your service in the National Guard.   You said that you carried weapons in war,  but you have never deployed actually in   a war zone. A campaign official said that  you misspoke. Did you? Well, first of all,   I'm incredibly proud to have done 24 years  of wearing the uniform of this country. equally proud of my service in a public school  classroom, whether it's Congress or or the   governor. My record speaks for itself, but I  think people are coming to get to know me. I   speak like they do. Um, I speak candidly.  I wear my emotions on my sleeves and, uh,   I speak, uh, especially passionately about,  uh, about our children being shot in schools. I speak like they do. Is he calling the rest  of America liars? He speaks about children   being shot in schools. What does that have  to do about stolen valor? He's just trying   to change the subject. He's trying to  distract voters so that they, you know,   like him on this one issue and totally  forget about the stolen valor accusations. Again, he's not denying any of  that. Around, around guns. So,   uh, I think people know me. They  know who I am. They know where, uh,   where my heart is. And again, my record has been  out there for over 40 years. Moral authority. And   the idea that you said that you were in war.  Did you misspeak as the campaign has said? Yeah, I said we were talking about, in this case,   this was after a school shooting. The ideas of  carrying these weapons of war. And, uh, my wife,   the English you're telling my grammar is not  always correct. But again, if it's not this,   it's an attack on my children for showing  love for me, or it's an attack on my dog. Uh, I'm not gonna do that. And the one  thing I'll never do is I'll never demean   another member's family. Service in any way  I never have okay Here's the thing. No one   is demeaning his service What people are  criticizing is him lying about his service   and he didn't here's the thing. He says it's  just my grammar He didn't just repeat these   claims just say these claims once he's repeated  them multiple times when it came to his rank He   was introduced by the incorrect rank multiple  times and he never corrected those people So it   would be one thing if he misspoke once because  everyone misspeaks, but when you start doing   it multiple times it's Just that there's  a pattern, either premeditated or sloppy. Either way, I think both of those are  disqualifying or are, um, huge red flags   about your character and your integrity. Um, so  I, I, I think that's a big deal. And again, he,   he didn't answer the question. Now, Kamala Harris  did answer one of the last questions that Dana   Bash, Dana Bash asked, and it was about whether  she had any regrets covering up for Joe Biden. And Kamala said she has no regrets.  What? What? She is literally only the   candidate right now because Joe Biden  dropped out, he was forced out, um,   because of that awful debate performance  because no one thought, you know,   that really exposed him finally as being  infirm, a day that will live in infirmary. Yes, I know it's infamy, but, uh, I'm calling  Joe Biden infirm. Some people don't get that   joke whenever I say it, so I just wanted to  explain. Um, but Kamala Harris said she has no   regrets covering up the health and Joe Biden's  obvious cognitive decline. I think this answer   right here should be disqualifying for her as a  candidate because she has endangered the Biden. I mean, we are literally on the verge of World  War III with what's happening in the Middle East,   Russia, China. Uh, hello? This is a national  security issue. Vice President Harris,   you were a very staunch defender of President  Biden's capacity to serve another four years.   Right after the debate, you insisted that  President Biden is extraordinarily strong. Given where we are now, do you have any regrets  about what you told the American people? No,   not at all. Not at all. I have, um.  served with President Biden, um,   for almost four years now. And I'll  tell you, it's one of the greatest   honors of my career. Truly. Um, He cares so  deeply about the American people. He is so. Again, this is another thing that they do.  They, they try to change the topic. So they   don't answer the question. Like, do you have  any regrets saying that Joe Biden was fine? Oh,   he cares about the people. He's so loving. He  said, that doesn't answer the question. But for,   again, for those. Low information voters who don't  follow the news and only hear these soundbites,   they think, Oh, she, she speaks so lovingly about  her boss, they really care about the country. And that's what's scary is that it's through no  fault of their own, the low misinformation vote,   low information voters. The fault lies with  the media for allowing these candidates to get   away with fluff, because that's what this is.  Intellectual junk food like this. Smart and,   um, and loyal to the American people. And I have spent hours upon hours with him, be  it in the Oval Office or the Situation Room.   He has the intelligence, the commitment,  and the judgment, um, and disposition that   I think the American people rightly deserve  in their president. She also claims that, uh,   her first thought when she found out Joe Biden  was dropping out of the race was about him. I don't think that's the case. I would bet  money that she thought about herself and   her own political future. Uh, what do you  think? My first thought was not about me,   to be honest with you. My first  thought was about him. Yeah,   I doubt that. Um, and so David Axelrod,  uh, excuse me, Obama's former campaign   advisor went on CNN afterwards, and he said  that this barely moved the ball forward. And, uh, CNN's review, uh, commentary  panel essentially agreed that, yeah,   it maybe moved the ball forward, but it wasn't a  touchdown. It wasn't a home run. Here's what they   had to say. Now, you might not like the way she  answered him, but she answered him as a capable,   qualified leader. And I do think she I think  she moved the ball forward a little bit. You know, maybe she didn't score a  touchdown tonight. It wasn't a huge,   I don't think she moved the ball that  much forward. No, and again, like I said,   at the very beginning of this video, I really  think she reminded voters why they elected   former president Donald Trump in the first  place. Because he's a candidate of change. He says what, uh, he means. He's not,  uh, Politically correct and people people   aren't supporting Trump just because of the  drama They're saying because they're they're   supporting him because they know when he says  something he means it when he says something   He's gonna do it when he says something.  It's not because it's poll tested It's not   because there have been these focus groups  and you know He's found these buzzwords that   are going to help him in the polls or help him  with Public approval or help him with his image. He says things that he means, you know, Tim Walz  says I take I talk like an ordinary person. No you   talk like someone Who's a crazy person. You talk  like someone who's a radical leftist because you   are. It's Trump who talks like a normal person.  It's Trump who, uh, talks about love of country   and love for our fellow man and our people and is  proud to be an American and puts America first. Meanwhile, the Democrats, all they've done the  last few years is talk about how racist and how,   uh, Uh, flawed America is that's why they  encouraged people and I get it's a first   amendment, right? That's why they encouraged  people to kneel during the national anthem.   That's why they're supporting pro Hamas  pro gaza pro palestine instead of pro   israel because israel is an ally of  america and is a symbol of the West. Okay, I'm getting off off topic here. But again,   I think Kamala Harris really just reminded  people that she is the status quo. She is a   normal politician who speaks in politician  speak. It's very polished sounding, um,   but doesn't really say anything. It's just  intellectual junk food, intellectual fast food. At first glance, you know, maybe satiate  satiates, uh, your hunger and your thirst,   but then you realize, wow, I'm really  malnourished because there was nothing   of substance there at all. She didn't  answer any of the questions. She, again,   has not revealed any of her policy  positions or her ideas. And, um,   hopefully, She'll feel comfortable after  this interview because the press is trying   to cover up for her and hopefully now she'll  give more and will expose herself even more. But as always all of that  is just my analysis and just   my opinion and I would love to know what  you think in the comments down below. Uh,   do you agree with my assessment? Do you think  Kamala Harris succeeded in this interview or do   you think she, like I think, um, Reminded  voters why they voted for Donald Trump? Let me know in the comments below. If you haven't  already, please be sure to give me a thumbs up. I   know it's a simple thing to ask for, but it really  does help me and the algorithm to reach more   viewers like you. Be sure to smash that subscribe  button and to check out one of these videos.