Alina Habba Flips Out After Judge Delays Trump’s Sentencing

On Friday, judge Juan Marshan announced that he  was going to be delaying Donald Trump's criminal   sentencing for the 34 felony conviction accounts  against him until November 26th, basically kicking   the can down the road until after the presidential  election. Now, most folks on the left definitely   not happy about this. I am also not happy about  this, but when you read Marshawn's ruling,   you kind of understand why he did it. Now, that  doesn't necessarily make me feel all warm and   fuzzy, but still I can understand it. Now, one of  the people who should have been celebrating this   decision, of course, was Trump attorney Alina  Haba, even though she, uh, you know, didn't   do a good job on really any of the cases she's  worked for him on, and she didn't specifically   work on this case. She, for some reason was  one of the most vocal, angry people about this   decision because immediately after the judge said  this, Alina Haba ran crying to Sean Hannity on Fox   News where she blasted the judge, even though  Donald Trump just got most of what he wanted. But Alina Haba told Sean Hannity this,  it's a joke. There's so much wrong with   this case. It should be completely admonished.  The judge should be admonished, in my opinion,   for not recusing number one, for not just missing  and for continuing to waste taxpayer dollars. This   is a joke and an atrocity that the American people  in the city of New York is seeing it. That's why   they've got crime, and that's why people are  fleeing. New York City has crime. Oh my God,   they've gotta be the only city in the, the  country that actually has crime. And, and why,   and why they have crime, as Alina Habbas says,  is because they're going after Trump. That's   why they have crime, which might be one of  the dumbest things I've ever heard her say   for the record. By the way, the crime  rate in New York's actually going down   and also to counter her other  claim, people are fleeing New York. No, they're not. That is flat out untrue.  Businesses are also not fleeing as they had   a record number of new business applications  just last year. Businesses are trying to get   into New York, and if people are fleeing New  York, it is not because of the crime rate,   it is because of the astronomical  cost of living in New York City. The,   the people who have left have made that abundantly  clear, but Alina Habbas says that New York has   crime because they're prosecuting Donald  Trump. And apparently crime didn't exist in   New York until that happened. Alina, let's not  forget, Donald Trump was convicted by a jury,   okay? 34 felony counts. Guilty on every single  one. He is a felon. He is a convicted felon.   So if you're gonna whine about crime, you may  want to take a step back and realize that even   though you don't like it, Donald Trump is  in fact, by definition, a convicted felon. So when you talk about that New York crime  rate, he's literally a statistic in it. But   she continued the fact that he is kicking the  can down the road while it is appreciated,   because he doesn't wanna appear to be doing what,  what I, and you have ca hold up, hold up, hold   up. I'm gonna reread that. 'cause I want you to  understand I didn't mess up. This is a transcript   of what she said. Well, it is appreciated because  he doesn't want to appear to be doing what I,   and you have called election interference, which  is what it is. Great. However, this case should be   frankly dismissed. So hitting the can down the  road, I appreciate. But quite honestly, Sean,   this should be vacated at its entirety. First  of all, it's kicking the can down the road,   not hitting the can down the road. Just, you  know, a little semantic thing for you there. Not to mention the fact that you wouldn't  say I, and you, you would say, you and I,   you know, one of the things that you want  from a lawyer, and I can tell you this,   after more than two decades of working around  some of the best lawyers this country's ever seen,   you want them to be a good orator, right?  They need to be able to speak, and by God,   they gotta be able to speak well, because  their words are what convinces courtrooms   to go in their favor. I have never in my life  heard any of these great attorneys and, and   I've interviewed a lot of the living members  of the trial lawyer Hall of Fame. By the way,   I would never hear any of them say, I and you are  going to the store. No, they're not that dumb.   Honest to God, it may seem simple, but again,  as somebody that has worked around some of the   best legal minds in this country that I and you  is so concerning to me, like I would never hire   a lawyer that would make such an just absolutely  dumb verbal screw up there, I and you, holy hell. But anyway, the decision itself, and you know  what, before I even talk about that, she's mad   that the judge didn't give them 100% of everything  they wanted. The judge is not going to vacate this   decision, nor should he. It's a jury conviction.  The Supreme Court immunity ruling does not apply   to it, according to the Federal appellate judge.  So I don't know why you're still whining about   this. You weren't even technically involved in it.  So Hannity shouldn't even be talking to you about   it. But he did. She screwed up repeatedly, doesn't  seem to understand what the legal issue is here.   And of course, she lied about people fleeing New  York and about the crime rate. As for the decision   itself, Marshan said this in the ruling,  the litany of perceived and unsubstantiated   grievances from PE previous filings by Trump that  do not merit this court's attention. You know,   all dismissed. Uh, but he did agree to the  delay, which the prosecutors also said, you Know what? We're fine with the delay. This  is not a decision this court makes lightly,   but it is the decision which in this court's view,  best advances the interest of justice. The court   is a fair, impartial, and apolitical institution.  Uh, postponing the sentencing should dispel any   suggestion that the court will have issued any  decision or imposed any sentence either to give   you an advantage to or to create a disadvantage  for any political party and for any candidate,   for any office, what we call that is a cover  your moment. And again, I understand why he did   it. Marshan has been getting death threats ever  since he was assigned to the case. And I do   think that plays a role in this, right? Like if he  issues the decision in September, the MAGA freaks   are coming at him full force no matter what. So  this is, let me protect myself, let me protect the   courts. But most importantly, again, let's protect  the election. Y'all think I'm gonna interfere with   it? I'll stay out. I won't give a decision till  afterwards. So it probably is the best decision,   but it doesn't mean we have to be happy about  it. We do, however, still have to accept it.