JON STEWART: Kamala is brat. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Doris is brat. JON STEWART: Doris is brat. And I didn't know what that
was, and then Maggie just goes. [MUSIC PLAYING] Hey, everybody. Welcome once again to The
Weekly Show with Jon Stewart. My name is Jon Stewart. So last we left off, Joe
Biden was the nominee. There was nothing
that anybody could do to-- to not have
Joe Biden be the, it was just too damn late. It's too damn late. It's too damn hard. The American people
won't stand for it. The Democratic Party
won't stand for it. Donald Trump is now the
inevitable next president. They are unified,
deified, and on their way. And now, there's
a new candidate and she is deified
and on her way. And it's a land,
and Donald Trump can't believe that he chose
JD Vance, who's a lunkhead. And now, it's been
a fucking week! And the whole thing is twisted
on its head, and none of it is really what's happening. And we still have another 3
and 1/2 months of this, gaa! I'm here with my erstwhile
producers, Brittany Mehmedovic and Lauren Walker,
and I apologize for the-- the sheer
mind-blowedness of it. But the media takes their
cues from the, the most prognosticating and
speculating amongst us and locks it in as
conventional wisdom. And you can just see,
none of it is, is real. It's mind-boggling. We had such a hard time. I don't know if
you guys do this. Why is it-- It's
difficult for us to book pundits or journalists
that are on television. Their organizations will not
let them come on our podcast. Let that sink in for
just a, a moment. Organizations that rely
on access and transparency refuse to allow their reporters
to come on podcasts to talk about the issues of the day. Why? What do they say to you,
Brittany, when you ask them? BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Honestly, I haven't been able to get clear
answers, which is part of the-- JON STEWART: Right. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
--I think, frustration. JON STEWART: We're
not naming names, but we may at some point. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Down the line. But it's unlike
anything I've really ever seen kind of
in-- in the decade that I've been doing this. Honestly, it just-- And
even the simple question, like phone calls go unanswered. It's a very just
like, we're going to politely decline on this. JON STEWART: This large
organization, NBC, left you on red. Didn't they leave,
after saying, no, we can't have our
reporter talk to you. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: And then they
stopped answering as to why. And the reporters say,
I'd love to do it. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. In this case, reporters are
like, would love to join, just need to get
network approval. JON STEWART: Network approval. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
And then network approval comes back and says,
we're going to decline on this. JON STEWART: Yeah. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
And I say, oh, why? JON STEWART: Right. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Is
there a scheduling issue? JON STEWART: Right. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Is there,
you know, what is the reason? We're politely declining. So you call and just say-- JON STEWART: Wow! BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
--can I understand it? Like, any, any information. We're reasonable, nice people.
JON STEWART: Well-- BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
--most of the time. JON STEWART: You, you are.
[LAUGHS] I don't know if I get to fall
into that, that category, but, but you certainly do. But just let that sink in. I just want people at home to
let that sink in for a second. News organizations stonewall
inquiries as to why their reporters
are not allowed, are being restricted
from just being able to come on a
stupid fucking podcast and give their
opinion, even as just a promotional tool for
either the reporter or for the organizations
that they-- BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: --work for. You know, I've once
heard a wise man say, democracy dies in darkness. But how is it possible that
a news organization would not feel shame and bewilderment
at using the techniques of obfuscation that they
rail against from politicians and public figures? Lauren, you worked, you were
in journalism for a long time. Do you recall there being that
type of, how in the world-- I understand that
you, you know, you can't go write
articles for other papers or you can't host a
show on another network. But these types
of promotional or cross-pollinating appearances
should be standard fare. Nobody's saying,
that person is now hired to be a part of our
regular ongoing commentary. LAUREN WALKER: I'm reluctant
to speculate, because you know, not very journalistic of me,
but I do imagine that they feel some type of ownership
of these journalists that they pay their paychecks. Maybe they don't want
their ideas anywhere else, or maybe you appear partisan
and they want to avoid. JON STEWART: This is NBC. I mean, they have MSNBC. They have-- Let me
ask you a question. Do you think this is a
universal rule or this is me? Like, it's hard not to
take this personally. It's a once a week podcast. We had the same
problem with CNN. They gave us a bunch
of shit for trying to bring somebody on. Like, it's, it's bonkers. And it makes no sense. And I would think it's--
it's an embarrassment to those organizations,
those news organizations. And the crazy thing to
me is, the journalists themselves think it's insane. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Yeah, they want to do it. JON STEWART: And it shows
the fundamental disconnect between the people that are
running these organizations and what those organizations
are supposedly there for, which is informing the public
on the issues of the day. Whether they're informing
it on somebody's podcast or something else. Just absolute nonsense. But I wanted to point
it out, because, and this is inside
baseball, and who even knows how much of this survives
the edit into, into the show, but like, I just wanted to give
props to Lauren and Brittany, who have to constantly pivot. LAUREN WALKER: We are
professional pivoters at this point. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
It makes it fun. JON STEWART: That's
so not the case. But I am excited
about today's program, because we do have access to
two incredibly knowledgeable individuals, and we're going
to be talking about all the changes that have
been taking place within the presidential race. We're going to be
talking about the media's inability to respond to
it with any kind of chill. But it's all grand
pronouncements. It's all just news. Biden is inevitable. Biden can't be inevitable. Biden can't win. Trump is inevitable. Kamala is inevitable. Trump is now regret. Like, holy shit, calm down. So I'm going to, let's-- let's
jump in with that now and-- and see where we go. [MUSIC PLAYING] All right, here we are. We're going to talk to our
guest, Doris Kearns Goodwin, presidential historian,
Pulitzer Prize-winning author, whose most recent book is
An Unfinished Love Story, A Personal History
of the 1960s. And also, Eugene
Daniels, POLITICO, White House correspondent
and Playbook co-author. Doris, lovely to see you again. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: You, too.
Yay! JON STEWART: And Eugene,
very nice to meet you. We've not met, but I'm excited
that you're on the program. Doris, I'm just
going to, I'm going to start with you real quick. As a presidential
historian, is this, this is catnip I would assume. You know, an unprecedented
moment in presidential history. Are you, are you
tasting the Pulitzer? Are you tasting
what's coming your way when you write this book? What are your thoughts on
the historic nature of what we're seeing right now? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
Well, you know, mostly, I live with dead presidents. And I think about
them in the morning and I think about them
when I go to bed at night, and I'm recounting history
that went long before. And I'm asking them questions
and they don't answer me. But this time, I'm living
in a clearly historic time. And for a presidential
historian, it just brings back echoes
from the past constantly. I'm living in the 1860s
or the 1920s or the, 1968. And so it's an
extraordinary time. I mean, you're happy to be
living in a difficult time. JON STEWART: What
are you, when you're hearing the echoes, what's,
what's resonating the most? Is it LBJ and him stepping
out in 1968 and opening up? That was obviously, I
guess, before the primaries or during the primaries. What are the echoes that
are resonating the most? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
I think it's clearly that's the last time
that a president withdrew from the race. He withdrew in
March 31 of 1968. And as you say, he was
already in the primaries. He wasn't doing well. He had been battered
in New Hampshire. He was about to
lose in Wisconsin. But much more importantly,
what was happening to him, was that they, he'd been told
that unless he sent 200,000 more troops to Vietnam,
that it would only-- and it could only be a
stalemate, if that was so. And he decided the time had
come to wind the war down. So that was the major
speech he was going to give. But he knew nobody
would believe it if he were still a candidate. So he prepared that speech. It stunned the nation when he
not only said that he was going to wind the war down, but
that he was going to withdraw from the presidency, so he
could spend all of his time on the presidential duties. I was watching
that, was stunned. My husband was up in New
Hampshire, Richard Goodwin, with Theodore White,
the great journalist. And White had told him that
five days before, he had seen LBJ, who looked terrible. He was under such pressure. And he felt like his face was
sunken, his voice was so soft. And now he watched
him on the screen. Before he even said he
was going to withdraw, and he looked like
a different person. Composed, relaxed. The tensions had been reduced. So that's what
reminded me most, I think, of what's
happening now. JON STEWART: Right. Now, to be fair,
and I think this is for the historical
record, LBJ never looked particularly great. Let's, let's be--
let's be clear. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
Oh, wait a minute. I'm going to argue with you,
I'm going to argue with you. JON STEWART: LBJ was
a caricaturist dream. The, the long, every,
every one of his features would be accentuated
and exaggerated, and, but, but it's fascinating. Now, Eugene, you're in,
you're in the middle of this. So Doris kind of gives us this
historical macro overview. EUGENE DANIELS: Yes. JON STEWART: You're
the micro guy. You're in there every day. The breakneck speed at
which this is all happening has got to be
dizzying for anybody who is on the inside trying
to cover all the developments. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. I'm hoping you can't see the
bags under my eyes or the eyes of the rest of
the correspondents or reporters that are
trying to cover the story. JON STEWART: Yes. EUGENE DANIELS: You know,
these are unprecedented times. I could use some more
precedented times, myself. That would be great. But I think the
thing that was really surprising outside
of the debates, we're watching the debate,
we go to POLITICO's offices. There's dozens of
people there watching. That happens around the
country and newsrooms. And immediately, people started
to be a little bit confused about what was happening. And then when
President Biden said, I beat Medicare, that
is when our flone, phone started blowing up. So really, that
sentence is really what set off this entire firestorm. JON STEWART: I,
I beat Medicare. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. And then Trump said,
yeah, you did, right? JON STEWART: So,
reporters and White House correspondents, they're
traveling with the president-- EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah.
JON STEWART: --at all times. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: I feel
like we've been watching this in slow motion
for two or three years. We understood, you know, there
was a sense that Biden was, he and Trump are both,
they're older men. There was sort of a sense
that Biden was going to be a one-term president. He, himself said, I'm
running to, to stop Trump, and, and that's going to be it. That debate couldn't
have come as a shock to the people that have
been with him day in and day out, no?
EUGENE DANIELS: It did. It did. And this is, and
this is why, right. So, we don't get to see
President Biden at all the private moments that a lot
of, like now you have members of Congress and governors
kind of coming out and having these stories where either
he didn't remember their name or he lost his train
of thought or he said something a little weird. Some of this is
stuff that Biden has always been doing, right. So we're not
starting, you know, the bar is already kind of
low here for what people are anticipating from him. He's not you this, people don't
see him as like this orator. And if you think about
it, the people around him, people who have been
doing this for a really long time, if he was
like that all the time, why would you debate? They decided that June 27 was
the debate that they wanted. They decided that it
should be before he had the nomination sewn up. They thought it would focus the
American people on the race. It has, but I think
not in the race, not in the way that,
that they wanted to. JON STEWART: Were they deluding
themselves to some extent? EUGENE DANIELS: I
think part of it is like, when you have an
older person in your life and as things start
to change, you, it's like also when you're like
gaining weight in your house, right. Like, as I gain weight, me
and my husband don't see it, but I go home, I go home
and see my grandmother and she's like, what, what
are these 20 extra pounds? JON STEWART: They
didn't realize Biden had a couple of, had some
love handles, had a couple of Dunkin' Donuts. Things were things were
getting out of control there. EUGENE DANIELS: That,
that is like the feeling. And when you talk to people,
that's what they say. And they knew he was old,
but they were moving forward. And I think the most
important aspect of this, is that you can put blinders
on when your focus is, no one else can beat Donald Trump. That is-- JON STEWART: Maybe
that was the delusion. EUGENE DANIELS: That's
the thing, right. That's the commandment
within Biden world, and always has been.
Only one person has. And they felt like he was
the best poised to do so. We don't know that
that's actually true. We're going to test that. The Democrats are going to test
that theory moving forward. But that was moving and
motivating them to move forward in the way that they were,
whether or not they saw at some point,
we will, everyone will write books and
long, deep articles about what people actually saw. JON STEWART: Doris will write
books and long, deep articles. Doris, what, what has changed? I'm curious what has changed
from the boys on the bus, from that idea of the access
to the presidential candidates? In your mind, was the
Biden campaign different traditionally from other
campaigns in the way that they limited access? Or has access, do we
have more reporters now, but less actual access? What's-- DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Oh,
I do think that access seemed more limited. I mean, just think about FDR. He had two press
conferences a week, every single week,
two press conferences. And that meant that the
reporters had access to him and they could
ask him questions, he could answer them. And then, he was also
having fireside chats. So that I think things
have diminished over time. JON STEWART: But they also
protected FDR to some extent. There was always that idea-- DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
They did protect him. JON STEWART: They
would never talk about his physical infirmity.
DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: No. In fact, it's incredible. When he went to give an
acceptance speech in 1936, as he was going down
the aisle, holding on to two strong people,
his braces unlocked. He fell on the floor and
they had to pick him up. He got up there and he gave a
great speech, the rendezvous with destiny speech. They never mentioned
that he had fallen or that his braces
had unsnapped. So things were different
then, and that's a problem. EUGENE DANIELS: Wow.
JON STEWART: Wow. DORIS KEARNS
GOODWIN: I just want to go back to one thing you
said before, when you said that, how badly LBJ looked. I knew him in the
last years of his life when his hair grew long.
JON STEWART: Yes. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
And it was white and he looked like a cowboy. And that was a
good-looking LBJ. But you know
what's interesting? I'm just thinking also--
JON STEWART: Doris. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
--about when I look at his, no, don't argue with me.
I saw him. JON STEWART: Doris, you
got a thing for presidents. You know, I've heard you
speak rapturously about LBJ. By the way, one
of the few people in the country who believes
Lincoln was a sexy beast. That's Doris Kearns Goodwin. DORIS KEARNS
GOODWIN: I told that. EUGENE DANIELS: I'm
with Doris on that. I'm with, I'm with
Doris on that. JON STEWART: All
right, fair enough. EUGENE DANIELS: Abe's up there. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
You know what happened, Eugene, was that I showed Jon a
picture when I was on his show a long time ago of Lincoln as a
rugged person before the beard. And he really did look sexy. I wish that beard
had never come. But, you know, one of the
things, one of the things you think about, is that the
pressures on the president are such. Can you imagine what
they were on with Biden once this debate had happened? You know, you want to
have a second term. JON STEWART: Sure. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: You
feel like that's even more important than the
first term, because it's an endorsement of you. You go over and you say
to yourself, what if I had just done it differently? It's what everybody who made
a mistake during a debate must have said, whether it was
Ford when he said something about Eastern Europe
or Mike Dukakis, when he said something
about capital punishment. You go the rest of your life. You know, I've talked
to these candidates and they say, you say, when
did you stop thinking about it? They said, what do you mean? You think we stopped
thinking about that? So for Biden, I think
in those first days, it must have been almost
frozen to think about that. And then he had to
consider, well, the press is coming after me,
those editorials, the donors are coming after me. And then for a
while, he could say, well, it's just the elites. But I think when the
Congressmen told him that their constituents,
the people, in other words, were 90 to 10 saying
he had to stand down, then he finally had
to make that decision. It's a really tough decision. JON STEWART: I think the
difference between, Doris references in terms
of Mike Dukakis, was a question that he had
gotten about if his family was violated through crime
and what he would do, he was against the death
penalty and what he would do. And he gave sort of a
twisted and interesting answer that some
say really lost him some support in the election. But those are-- Having a bad debate
where you misspeak is different than
something that looks fundamentally unsettled. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. He was failing to put
sentences together, right, and thoughts together. And, you know, they
went into this thinking that you have Donald Trump,
who in every debate just kind of like yells and says
all these things that are miss-true, that are
untrue, and that Biden would look really smart
going into the details of all of these things. So they tried at one point,
to say that he overprepared. But he wasn't saying sentences. He was struggling.
It was very obvious. They said he had a cold. It will be a very long time. We may never know what the
actual truth is of what was happening up there,
because we've seen him since, and he's kind of
back to old man Biden as opposed to what we
saw on the debate stage. But I think something
that's-- that continues to be fascinating to me, is that
when they were saying that it was the elites that
wanted Biden out, that was almost never true. The primary, the primary that
wasn't, had in polling that voters wanted something else. Voters one, did not want
a Trump v Biden race, and even Democrats didn't
want President Biden. JON STEWART: Right. EUGENE DANIELS: And then
the Democratic apparatus, as it is, kind of came together
and decided, as they often do, no, we're going
with the incumbent. It is rare that, that,
especially nowadays, that they would do
something differently. And then what really, I think,
turned the tide for Biden, was kind of the way
that he and his team strategized and
worked this out. That first week,
when it was kind of, they hunkered down and did
the normal Biden world thing, which they ignore everything. They don't, they don't
want to be distracted. And then they focused on, he
had that North Carolina rally. Then he had the,
the one interview with George Stephanopoulos. And they really thought that
that was going to move things. It didn't. JON STEWART: But
they must have known that that
Stephanopoulos interview was unimpressive, at best. EUGENE DANIELS: I talked
to quite a few people. They thought that they had,
he had done, like maybe like a C minus, which
is like enough to pass, not enough to get you, you-- JON STEWART: Right. EUGENE DANIELS:
--might still graduate, but you have to keep going
if you get, depending on how the grades shake out
on the other tests, you might still get out
of this high school. And I think that is what
they ended up doing. And on Monday, when he sent
this letter to Hill Democrats being super defiant, basically
saying, get over it and get in line, that is
when he started to hear a lot of members
of Congress being like, oh, we're not doing that. His Morning Joe interview
was, was in that same vein. So he went to being defiant. And at one point, he
had to be humbled. And so it, and then
he dropped out. And so these, the way
that those decisions were made also really impacted
how much Democrats were upset. And when he said in that George
Stephanopoulos interview, it just matters if I
just give my darndest. JON STEWART: If we end
up a fascist regime, as long as I gave it my all, I
think everybody will be happy. Doris, I want to ask you. So very clearly, the Democratic
Party lined up behind Biden and made sure that the primary
season was not a real one. It was kind of a
Potemkin village and they put up one candidate,
I think it was Dean. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
Phillip, Phillips. JON STEWART: Dean Phillips,
who we've all decided is actually not a real person,
but in fact, the picture on a hose sales ad. But Trump has utterly
usurped the entire apparatus of the Republican Party. It really is in
service to one man. He controls the platform. He writes it specifically. It takes out all the things
that are traditionally. Doris, how Democratic
are these parties? How much do they
normally control what these apparatuses are? And how much of a say, you
know, there's delegates, there's super
delegates, there's all these things that make it
not a true Democratic party. But at least with
the Democrats, they are answering in
many ways, to their base, to their voters, who are
saying, this can't be. We can't have this guy. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Right. I mean, I think in the old
days, the political bosses in the Democratic Party
or the Republican Party, had complete control
at the convention. There weren't any primaries. You could just decide
who it was you thought would be the best
leader, and then they'd go forth in September. It would go from
September to November. Sometimes I wish we
could go back to that. You know, the primaries
started in 1912 with Teddy Roosevelt wanting
to beat Taft in his own party. JON STEWART: There were
no primaries before 1912? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: No
primaries before 1912. It was the people should
rule, that was the argument. And Teddy Roosevelt
wanted to beat his own friend and the
current president, Taft. So he needed primaries,
because he had the popularity and Taft had the party
delegates on him. So anyway, that, that
splits the Democratic Party, the Republican Party in two.
JON STEWART: Wow. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: And
that's the end of the primary. Nobody wants it anymore,
until it finally comes back in the '50s and the '60s. And where it really
becomes strong, is in 1968, when Humphrey
wins, despite having not gone into the primaries, because
he had the party delegates behind him and Lyndon Johnson. Then they decide, we need
primaries, we need primaries. I mean, the thing we
were saying about Biden, is that there were
only 14 million people that voted for him. He kept touting the fact that,
I was voted for by the people, 14 million votes. 51 million people
watched that debate. And that's a huge distinction,
because that debate, once seen, could not be unseen. JON STEWART: But also, those
primaries were perfunctory. For, for Biden, they
were perfunctory. But I want to talk about,
Doris, this brings up an interesting point, because
we view the way things are done now as though it's the way
things have always been done. It's the status quo. It's conventional wisdom. This is the only way to do it. And Eugene, we'll get to
you with this in a second, because I think it informed
some of the coverage. What I saw in the coverage
was, this is impossible. It's way too late to in any
way ever switch a candidate. But the truth is, that is an
utterly modern phenomenon. And none of this ever
even takes place. Generally, I think
none of it even begins to take place until the
convention and moving forward. This permanent campaign that we
are in is a modern phenomenon, is it not, Doris? DORIS KEARNS
GOODWIN: Absolutely. No, in the old days, where we
produced Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin
Roosevelt, we didn't even start thinking
about the convention until the convention came. Somebody would come
out of the convention. Then they would wait
until Labor Day, and then the campaign would
start right after Labor Day. And we had two months to
decide who it was going to be. And somehow, we may have
done a better job then. But I think the interesting
thing is, where the leaders came back, the Democratic
leaders came back in the Biden situation was, even before
the debate, 3 out of 4 people thought he was too old. They were not happy with either
choice of Trump or Biden. But somehow they didn't
pay attention to that. They thought you had to take
the person who was there. He had done a good
job as president, et cetera, et cetera. But then once that
debate happened, those leaders are the ones that
helped to make things change. Nancy Pelosi said
the question is, was it an episode or a condition. They started making
space for the fact that he might not be
able to stay there. The pressure kept building up. They spoke up. So the leaders, the leaders
of the Democratic Party really helped to
make this happen. Because, as I say, they were
hearing from the people. So finally, he had to
make the decision, as hard as it was for him. JON STEWART: So in some ways,
it was the base that, that decided this, not the elites. It was, finally, it seemed the
elites listened to the base! DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
Listened to the people. That's exactly right. JON STEWART: The base had
been saying all along, I'm not comf-- And, and you see this. Now, Eugene, this brings
up an interesting point to me about the coverage. And I want to talk about
as this thing was swinging, the sort of hot takes
that come out of this. And it was, I'm just
going to give you some of the examples of-- of,
of the whiplash that people were going through. So the articles were,
Democrats who believe Biden should drop out are insane. They are walking
into a death trap. How, they are, these are idiots
that would say it's too late. It's too late for
Biden to drop out. Biden is your only chance. You are idiots. Two days later,
they are saying, excitement around Kamala Harris
are the Democrats only chance. Thank God they finally
pulled the plug on this death trap
of a candidacy that was Joseph Biden. In the same way, a
week before, it was Donald Trump is inevitable. The Republicans are coming
out of this convention. JD Vance is a brilliant stroke. And now they're writing,
Trump is in trouble. He hates JD Vance. JD Vance is the worst. What, do the reporters ever
read their own articles? EUGENE DANIELS: We do. But this is, this is
one of the things, Jon, is that like one of
the many, is that there is so much going on right now. JON STEWART: Yes. EUGENE DANIELS: Like,
we are on this podcast, and who the hell
knows what we're going to come back
to, what world we're going to come back to. JON STEWART: You
think Harris is out. EUGENE DANIELS: You never-- JON STEWART: And now Shapiro
is in, and we're moving on. EUGENE DANIELS: You never know. Like, the, the speed at which,
even like the last like, I don't know, 40,
since, since June 27, the speed at which
this cycle has moved, has been so wild. And I think what we try to do,
is give people kind of a sense of what's happening right now. I think often, not
often, I think sometimes, that we-- we, as well as other
folks, miss the mark, right. You have politicians
who miss the mark. And I think being declarative
about it had a lot to do with how Democrats
were speaking about it, how behind closed doors
they wanted him gone, but they, they didn't
know how to do it. But also, whether or not they
had the actual wherewithal like inside of them to do this,
to get rid of this guy who everyone loves and thought, and
really thought did a good job, but thought that he was
going to make them lose and tear all of them down. More importantly, did
they understand the rules of how an open convention
or a contested convention would actually work? And I think that's
where a lot of the like, they would be insane
to do this, came from. Because Democrats were
like, how would we pick? It would be, we can't do that. 14 million people
voted for this man. Like, how, what
does that look like? But I talked to Elaine
Kamarck, who is an expert. She's literally
written multiple books. She updates it
every four years, about the conventions and
primary system for Democrats. Also, the wife of Steny Hoyer,
one of the members of Congress and a former leader
in the House. And what she said is, it
is just like everyone just misunderstands what
is actually possible. That the power, it's
really like when you, you vote for a
representative to Congress, they make decisions
on your behalf when they can't go
back to all of you and find out what
you want to say. And so they send
these delegates. And the delegates
have all the power. And so had President
Biden stayed in-- JON STEWART: Right. EUGENE DANIELS:
--the delegates who are people who
aren't just saying they're going to vote for him. JON STEWART: No, they're--
they're, they're self-selected by the campaign so
that they're loyal. EUGENE DANIELS: They're
very loyal people. JON STEWART: Sure. EUGENE DANIELS: So, so it's
like the operation of this, was, I think, misunderstood
by not just reporters. And I count myself,
you called it. You said idiots. I'm a count myself amongst
the idiots ignoring-- JON STEWART: Not idiots, no.
EUGENE DANIELS: --the lesson. JON STEWART: Eugene. EUGENE DANIELS:
Learning the lesson. JON STEWART: Because
you're not an idiot. EUGENE DANIELS:
But like, it's a, it's a good lesson for
all of us about like how quick the news cycles moves. JON STEWART: But
Eugene, you know the lesson won't be learned. EUGENE DANIELS: I learned
it, how about that? JON STEWART: No, but it's. I'm going to read you. Here's, here's the, I'm
going to read you The Run. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: Forcing
Biden out would have only one beneficiary, Trump.
EUGENE DANIELS: Right. JON STEWART: The Atlantic. EUGENE DANIELS: At one
time, that made sense. JON STEWART: Trump
is preparing, right. The Atlantic. Trump is preparing
for a landslide win. New York Times. This is how you know
Trump smells victory. July 15. Donald Trump, man
of destiny, July 18, the Democrats
aren't even trying. July 19, Republicans
emerge from convention confident in Trump, talking
about a blowout victory. July 22, pathetic Trump
already trying to weasel out of debating Kamala Harris. Same day. Why Trump suddenly thinks
picking JD Vance was a mistake. Same day, Kamala Harris'
shocking fundraising numbers terrify Trump. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: When are we
going to learn from the media? Doris, you know,
we keep talking about the difference in the
old days and the new days. There's no question back
then, the smoke-filled room was the elites choosing
things, the reporters had a different relationship
with the candidates. But what we have now is chaos
without context or perspective. Hot takes, that in many
ways, inflame the electorate rather than illuminate
the electorate. How do we take a breath? What do we do in terms of, we
can't change the speed at which events take place,
but can we change the manner by which we either
cheer that on or cover it? Doris, what's, what's
your thought on that? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: You know,
that's a really good question. I mean, the problem is, when
breaking news happens, there's an emotion that goes
with that breaking news, whether it was
the assassination attempt or the
Republican convention, or then the fact that Kamala
Harris has done so well in the last couple days,
that that emotion becomes part of what the press covers. And it means that
you're changing 90 degrees, as you're
saying, or 180 degrees from where you are before. Maybe you can just sort
of have a longer view. I mean, the weird thing
about the old days, was that the political
bosses, yes, they may have been in
smoke-filled rooms, but they were looking for a
candidate who could bridge the divides in the party. So they weren't looking for
an extreme on either side. The problem with the
caucus system now and the primary
system is often, a candidate comes
from the extreme and then has to work their
way back to the middle in order to win
at the other end. But it is more Democratic. We can never go
backwards sometime, and I don't think people
would even go back to the smoke-filled
rooms, although I like some of those
old political bosses in the old days. They had an intuition
about who could possibly be the right
person for that time. So, when that first
primary happened, The New York Times
wrote an editorial saying it was so vicious, as
I was saying, between Taft and Teddy, Taft called,
called Teddy a dictator, and Teddy, Teddy
called Taft a pinhead, that it was embarrassing.
And if this is the-- JON STEWART: Pinhead? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
--first primary system, we hope we hope it's the last. We hope it's the last. And they said, we must have a
blush on everybody's cheeks. I know, a pinhead is kind of
a weird thing to call him. But that meant he didn't have a
lot of brains in that pinhead, right? JON STEWART: I just
find it interesting that these, these lions
of American democracy and statesmanship, and
we have no idea the day to day of how
they were actually dealing with each
other, and the pinheads. But Eugene, I want to ask you. Look, reporters
are human beings. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: And they're
invested in this, as well. But I want to ask
you, do you think now that the ubiquity
of the coverage incentivizes reporters
to the hot take? You're human beings. You're going to see
what gets the clicks. And maybe that
shapes the extremity of what goes on there. But it's something that struck
me during Donald Trump's trial, is that in court,
they just litigate the parameters of reality, the
parameters of what happened. There are evidentiary
standards and there are things that each side has to follow. Do you think that our
journalists could maybe take some lesson from that idea
of litigating the parameters of our reality, rather
than the speculation towards what this all means? Because as we see,
that is what's so temporal and
ephemeral and doesn't really stand the test of time. But litigating what's
going to happen next or how it's supposed to happen,
seems like a worthy endeavor. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah,
I think you're right. I think the problem is, that
people who engage in the media are asking for context. What does this mean? What does, how does this
compare to the past? What could happen? And I think there's a fine
line between analysis and kind of prognosticating
and guessing. You can say former President
Donald Trump got shot. Republicans feel x, y and z. Democrats have
paused on fighting with Biden because of it. Republicans feel like
this is going to give them a straight shot to November. That is, that is fully things
that are true at the time. And so therefore, will remain
true that that happened and that's how
people felt about it. I think the bigger
problem is the word, a lot of people using
the word journalist who are not journalists. A lot of people who are--
JON STEWART: OK. EUGENE DANIELS: --saying
they're reporters, are not that. And so you're having
folks that are like share, are sharing full opinions and
on, whether it's cable news, on podcasts, in their own
articles, in op-eds, like, the American people
aren't really, they have so much going on-- --that they are not going
to spend a lot of time to go Google if, if Joe Bob is
an actual reporter at a news organization or if
Joe Bob used to work for the Democratic
Party at one point and now he's a
consultant, right. They're not going to do that. JON STEWART: But there
are news organizations of great reputation that I
just read those headlines from. Those aren't, that's not
from like Jimmy's blog. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART:
That's The New York Times, The Atlantic, Politico. Like, these are
reputable organizations. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: I think
that people should have, given what we've seen
in the last four weeks where everything
changed, a greater respect for the idea that fate
could intervene at any time. And maybe that
would prevent them from making whatever's
happening now a projection for the future. I mean, for example,
when, when Lyndon Johnson pulled out of the
race, accolades everywhere. He was able three days later,
North Vietnam said they would come to the bargaining table. It was his happiest
day of his life. People on the streets
were cheering for him. And then the next
day, as the plane was ready to go
to Hawaii to bring people to start
the negotiations, Martin Luther King was killed. And then the riots
happened in the streets. And then two months later,
Bobby Kennedy was killed. JON STEWART: Oh, my goodness. That all happened within those? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Within. That's what I'm saying. So, that should give you a
sense that fate can intervene. Things can change
at any moment. And maybe even what you're
feeling at the moment. Vance is a great choice. He's they're
heading toward the-- You don't have to say where
we're going for the future. We should have more,
more understanding that we don't know the future. And the future keeps backing us
up every single time, as we've seen in this last four weeks. Who could have predicted the
events of the last four weeks? So I think they
should feel able. And now, I'm, Eugene
knows this better than I, I'm not a journalist. I know 50 years from
now, if I come back, I'll tell you exactly
what it was going to be and how it ended. But they can't know
that at the time. JON STEWART: Doris, did
you just say, if I may, did you just make
the prediction? You're coming back in 50 years? [LAUGHTER] To put in context for
the American public-- DORIS KEARNS
GOODWIN: Well, look, if my dead
presidents are alive, wouldn't that be terrific? JON STEWART: I think
that's amazing. No, that's a wonderful point. EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: I wanted
to ask, and Eugene, this is probably to you. What does happen now? What are the mechanics? [LAUGHTER] No, I don't mean, what happens
now is like, Kamala Harris. What are the mechanics
now of this convention? EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. JON STEWART: Basically, it,
it is an open convention, I would assume, unless
they do a nominating vote prior to that. But what, what are
the mechanics of what we're going to see next? EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah. I mean, first, the
rules committees are meeting to decide
the rules, right, within, within the party. JON STEWART: Those
are not set prior? That's, that's something that
happens that close to it? EUGENE DANIELS: Yeah.
You can change. And then they, and then
often they vote on the rules like as a full delegation
at the convention. And so-- JON STEWART: Who are the
Rules Committee made up of? Are they delegates?
EUGENE DANIELS: They are. Some of them are delegates,
but a lot of them are like the, a lot of names of
them are people that folks will
recognize as people who are in Democratic politics. They are members of different
types of constituencies. JON STEWART: OK.
EUGENE DANIELS: They are-- JON STEWART: Muckety-mucks
of the party. EUGENE DANIELS: --governors,
they're governors, they're members of. And so they're
senators, some of them are local and state
senators and members of the House Assemblies. And so they will
kind of get together, they will decide
what they're doing. We've got a draft proposal, and
essentially what it says is, we're going to vote, and we're
going to still have to hold a virtual roll call vote. And the reason is, they are
certain that this kind of Ohio rule that if you don't
have the name selected, if your person
is not nominated, they can't make
it on the ballot. Ohio changed the law. Ohio said, this law
no longer matters. We can move on. The Democrats have
chosen to ignore that. JON STEWART: How is it that
a state could say you need the name of your nominee
before you would get your nominating convention? That doesn't seem
to make any sense. EUGENE DANIELS: And so they,
they made this rule before, it seems before the
convention was like fully set. And so that is where, it
kind of everyone woke up and they're like,
wait a second, we have to figure
something out here. So they were going to do
this with President Biden. There was a conversation
about, maybe we don't need to
do it with Harris. Ohio says they're good to go. But they don't trust
the Republicans in Ohio at their word. And so they're going
to continue to do that. And so it's by all
intents and purposes, Vice President Harris is
the presumptive nominee. We're not using that word,
because they've, they've committed to her, they're
not pledged to her. So, again, with
keeping, knowing that fate can
intervene, Doris, they could get on that
roll call vote and say like, Jon Stewart is
going to get it, let's go. JON STEWART: What? Oh, my God! I had no idea. EUGENE DANIELS:
Congratulations. JON STEWART: I promised
myself I wouldn't cry. Eugene, thank you so much.
I-- EUGENE DANIELS:
President Stewart. JON STEWART: --accept.
DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: I accept. JON STEWART: I'm only running
in Ohio, only in Ohio. EUGENE DANIELS: Only in Ohio. And so that part
will happen early. That also means Vice
President Harris has to pick a running mate
before then, because it's, the way that the proposal
and the draft was, is that the speed at which,
that she would have to do that. JON STEWART: This
is just idiotic that Ohio is going to lead the
Democrats around by the nose, rather than
trusting the process that they have in place for
choosing it in a measured way. It doesn't, it doesn't
make any sense. And it just shows-- EUGENE DANIELS: Democrats don't
want to roll the dice here, is what it is. They don't want to
roll the dice in Ohio. JON STEWART: And
maybe this is where we, this is where we end up. And this is where we end. And I thank you both
for, for, for being here. But I want to talk
about this very quickly. We are such a convoluted mess
when it comes to our election systems, whether it's through
the financial shenanigans of super PACs and all
the loopholes that exist, and corporations are people,
and money is free speech. And the $14 or $15
billion that we're going to spend
on this election. And we don't know where
the dark money is from. So from the financing to
the rules to the ubiquity to the fact that it
doesn't ever end, which means we are always
at each other's throats and never have time for makeup
electoral sex in the country, like we're just fighting at
all times, like, we are a mess. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
But you know what, Jon? JON STEWART: Yes, ma'am. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: We
created these problems, we can solve these problems. We can change things. We can have a
political revolution. JON STEWART: Come on! DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
We can make it so that money is not in politics. We can do these things. I mean, why are the best people
not running for public office now? Because they know
they're going to have to spend their time raising
money, tons and tons of money. They know their private lives
are going to be exposed. They don't think
that they're going to be able to get
very much done, because the two parties
are at loggerheads. We created these problems
by the system we created. We can change that system. JON STEWART: You know,
they talked about, we can't make a change
in our candidate, even given this most extreme
and urgent new information that we've received
during a debate, because we don't
have enough time. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
We have time. JON STEWART: Meanwhile,
France did their, they did two elections
in six weeks. England did it in eight weeks. And those systems
can be applied here. We have an electoral
industrial complex that needs to be broken up. It is monopolistic, and, and
FTC needs to get involved. Eugene, what say you, sir? EUGENE DANIELS: I
think you're right. As someone who's in
DC a lot, and I'm not going to prognosticate,
but I have not seen enough of the kind of
excitement from you and Doris about these kinds of
things big enough to see changes actually happen. I can be pretty cynical on
some of the political things, because people will say one
thing behind closed doors. I'm pointing to my door. You can't see it. One thing behind closed doors,
and then a completely different thing like to your face. And you know that the
thing, both of those things are happening. So our political incentive
structure is off, first of all. And so people
don't always speak the things that they feel. Many of them do want
these kinds of changes. Many of them want money
out, money out of politics. There are a lot
of Republicans who are speaking this
language right now, which is really interesting. It used to be more of
a Democratic message. And so there's a world in
which they do come together. That world has to-- And this could be
one of those moments where maybe the parties are
looking around, depending on what happens in November-- JON STEWART: Well,
the parties won't do it, because anybody who
thinks they'll lose advantage-- EUGENE DANIELS: Right. JON STEWART: --in the same
way that DC will never become a state, because in the
way that our system works, you can't, the Republicans will
never go for a Democratic area getting a senator or
getting, you know, they're just never going to
go for that type of sharing. But I think solving
the time problem solves the money problem. EUGENE DANIELS: And
it helps to solve the hatred in the country. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
That's right. EUGENE DANIELS: You know,
like the amount of attacks that we all receive, come from
this, like the length of time at which--
JON STEWART: Yes. EUGENE DANIELS: --we're
hitting each other. There's attack ads. Everyone's saying,
this person's the worst person that's ever lived.
JON STEWART: It's a constant. Yeah.
EUGENE DANIELS: Exactly. So, it's just, there's
a lot of things that if we fix this
one thing, could work better in this country. I think the country might
be better off for it. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:
Let us three pledge. Let's pledge that we're
going to argue about this. I mean, just think of how much
better our lives would be if we only had to focus on
these presidential elections over a six-week
period or a 10-week period. JON STEWART: Right. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: And we
didn't have to think about them day after day after day. We just have to believe
that we can do it. I mean, we've made bigger
changes in our lives, in our political
lives over time. We ended segregation. We allowed more people
to vote that didn't vote. Women couldn't
vote for so long, and Black people couldn't
vote for so long. We've made those changes. We have to change the
system as it is now. You've gotten me really
riled up right now. I better live for
another 50 years, so I can be part of this. I want to be part of it. JON STEWART: I'm
so riled up, and I know that you and Eugene are
riled up, and we can do this. EUGENE DANIELS: And we
have the technology. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: OK. EUGENE DANIELS:
This is a world, and the media cycle that,
like, in years ago, like, if this was the, the '60s
or even if it was the 1800s and people had to get on their
horse and buggy and go around and introduce themselves
to all the Americans, that would be much more difficult. These people can
introduce themselves at the drop of a hat. There, you can have the amount
of ads, the amount of Twitter, the amount of
information we can get about these people
in a short amount of time actually wouldn't be difficult. JON STEWART: Two to three
months is almost too long. People will already
be sick of it. You'll already be in that cycle
of, I'm tired of this person, I want the next person. The idea that this vetting
process is somehow getting us closer to more competent
and better leadership is nonsense and insane. And we have created an
electoral campaign system that does the opposite of what
it is intended to do, which is, we've created a
system so burdensome, so onerous, so expensive, so
hate-filled, that all it does, is drag the worst
of us to the highest positions in leadership. And I say, it changes now. And I'm proud to announce my
co-chairs of Eugene Daniels and Doris Kearns Goodwin. And we're going to
make this happen. And I didn't even--
DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Hurray! JON STEWART: I didn't
even curse once-- EUGENE DANIELS: Not once. JON STEWART: --during
that entire speech. EUGENE DANIELS: Very
good, very good. JON STEWART: You
guys are the best. Thank you for, for,
for joining us today. Really helpful and
really informative. Doris Kearns Goodwin,
it's always an honor to see you and a delight. I don't see you enough. And Eugene Daniels,
so nice to meet you. Doris Kearns Goodwin,
presidential historian, Pulitzer Prize-winning author. Most recent book, An
Unfinished Love Story Personal History of the '60s. Eugene Daniels,
POLITICO White House correspondent,
Playbook co-author, thank you both so
much for joining us. EUGENE DANIELS: Thank
you for having me. DORIS KEARNS
GOODWIN: Thank you. [MUSIC PLAYING] JON STEWART: Man! [BANGING] That was terrible for Rob
on sound and, or Nicole, but, man, I'm fired up now. There was an epiphany
in the middle of it that it's not about the-- the money follows the time. Because the elections are never
ending, the, the money hose is unceasing. If we change the time,
we change the money, we change the
atmosphere, we change the corrosive and
eroding effects that it has on our souls. We shorten the time we have
to endure this nonsense. LAUREN WALKER: That is so true. It really gave me
hope, because when I think about tackling the
money in politics issue, it seems insurmountable. But addressing the time
is a secret way in. JON STEWART: I
think that's right. It's a back door hack. It's, we call it a life
hack on the TikTok world. LAUREN WALKER: Yes. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Jon, are you on TikTok? JON STEWART: I'm in
my life hack era. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Got it. JON STEWART: I'm not on TikTok,
but Maggie makes me know-- BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: --Kamala is brat. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Doris is brat. JON STEWART: Doris is brat, and
I didn't know what that was, and then Maggie just goes. And I was like, I don't
know what that is, but I'm assuming
it's something. But I have no idea. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
You did well. JON STEWART: But, but,
but all delightful. How are we doing otherwise? I know we got some viewer
questions or comments. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: What, what, what
are we dealing with this week? BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
We put out a call asking for people to send
in some questions for you. So we have some for you. JON STEWART: Come at me, bro.
Come at me, bro. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
We have someone who is starting college, and
their roommates are random. And they want to
know how they can avoid opinion slash political
conflict in a tight dorm room. JON STEWART: Oh,
you're not supposed to. That's the whole
point of a dorm room. The whole point
of a dorm room is, and then you got to read like
Catcher in the Rye and then like, just get all fucked
up and high and talk about it till 6:00 in the morning. The whole point of the college
dorm room is not to avoid that, but to learn to navigate your
way through it with this person that is really only in
there because you guys wake up around the same time. I think that's pretty much
how college roommates are now selected is, what
time do you wake up, and are you a
complete fucking pig. You know, so that's
the gradation. But I would suggest, you
are in close quarters. There is no better, you
are now in the dojo. You are in the conversation
and topic dojo, a 10 by 12 room, two twin beds,
with plastic covering on it. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: You haven't
slept on shit like that ever. And, and this is boot
camp for learning how to get along with another
person that you don't-- I think they should switch
roommates every six weeks and throw you into a
whole other scenario of political and
sociological tumult. And it should always end with
like 6:30 in the morning being like, in theory, socialism does
sound good, but in practice, it just never worked. That's what I, don't avoid it. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Lean in. JON STEWART: Dive
in head first, feet first, and invest
in a durable bong. Or is that, that's probably
old school advice, because now the kids probably
smoke in those, you know, the
whatever those are. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Vapes?
JON STEWART: Vapes! BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah.
There you go. JON STEWART: Every
time I, every time I get a word or a thing
that I don't quite-- Yeah, done, settled. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: All
right, next question, and this is a quote. Oh, my God, babe, you've got
to drop your skincare routine. JON STEWART: Oh. Well, here's,
here's my routine. Don't do anything for 61 years. And let the chips
fall where they may. [LAUGHS] Terrible, terrible. Well, so far, I
think we've done an excellent job at responding
to, to viewers' concerns. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Do
you want another one? JON STEWART: You give
me one more and then, and then we'll move it on. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Yeah, all right, Jon. JON STEWART: Here
we go, come on. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
I need advice on how to end a relationship. JON STEWART: Oh. It's so interesting to me. We're doing a podcast about
social and political issues, and everything we're getting so
far is like my lifestyle blog. Like, I think they want me
to be a get ready with me influencer.
BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: Talk about
breakups and skincare. I think I've been doing
the wrong show forever. LAUREN WALKER: That's
the next podcast. JON STEWART: The breakup
thing is, be creative. Nobody wants just
a straight thing. Have them come in a room and
go, oh, it's so bright in here. And then lower the
blinds, and on it Is written, get the fuck out. Get out of my house. And then they're going to be
like, oh, shit, that hurts. But, props to you for the
creative endeavor in the way that you did it. BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC:
Some production value. LAUREN WALKER: It's like
a reverse promposal. JON STEWART: That's right.
BRITTANY MEHMEDOVIC: Yeah. JON STEWART: Solid show. Boy, did I love Doris. Very nice to meet Eugene. As always, I want to thank
Lead Producer, Lauren Walker, Producer
Brittany Mehmedovic, Video Editor and Engineer. Rob Vitola, Audio
Editor and Engineer, Nicole Boyce, our Researcher
and Associate Producer, Jillian Spear, and
Executive Producers Chris McShane, Catie Gray. You guys are killing it. Great topics, great
research, great information. Thank you all so much. And that's it for us. We'll see y'all next
time on The Weekly Show. Bye bye. [MUSIC PLAYING] The Weekly Show
with Jon Stewart is a Comedy Central podcast. It's produced by Paramount
Audio and Busboy Productions.
The idea that like hey it's it's the almighty or the alternative or whatever the the the bro don't compare me to the almighty compare me to the alternative to the alternative which is what i use with my wife and her ex-boyfriend all the time you know oh are you are you getting prim married in your own... Read more
When there's a large threat there's two things that you define you define the threat and then you define your defenses all i'm saying is if we are taking an honest look at what our best chance to defend ourselves against a perceived threat i think we are selling ourselves short and in in a lot of ways... Read more
[music] we are such a convoluted mess when it comes to our election systems whether it's through the financial shenanigans of super pcts and all the loopholes that exist and corporations are people and money is free speech and the 14 or 15 billion dollars that we're going to spend on uh this election... Read more
I actually created ivf i will personally inseminate any woman with sperm that wants it that's how much i believe in [music] ivf hey everybody welcome to the weekly show podcast with me john stewart we are back we are back with britney mmedic lauren walker our a wild producers we have been away for months... Read more
Jon stewart opens after the final night of the dnc [applause] hello. what's up? welcome to the daily show. my name is john stewart. and once again, ladies and
gentlemen, welcome to chicago. [applause] n/a oh, what a lovely group. lovely theater, lovely group. we are live. right now, we are live. the... Read more
[music] here we are less than two months out from the election and we've basically got a tide race the candidates are doing everything they can do to ramp up the excitement kamla is speaking to voters in pennsylvania in spice stores trump is speaking to voters encased in bulletproof glass and jd vance... Read more
Lauren i wanted to get your your thought do you think uh and alex jones has this theory as well do you think that the democrats are going to sweep in see i didn't think he was gonna biden was gonna endorse kamala when he when he said that he wasn't going to run again but do you think the democrats are... Read more
I knew there would be
some wu-tang apparel when you walked out there. well, after you
sung the praises of wu-tang at your
chicago convention show. you saw that? yeah, of course i did. you talked about how that
era, 1991-1995, four best years in american history.
i agreed. - you agree, right?
- i agreed.... Read more
So because we've done two debates and because they were successful there will be no third debate as everyone saw two nights ago we had a monumental victory over comrade camala harris in the presidential dep in a significant development ahead of the november 5th election republican presidential candidate... Read more
Now 2024 debate between vice president kla harris and former vice former president would happen they said it wouldn't happen because trump was trying to run away but now no audience though which i pr you donald trump said nop it probably wasn't going to get too rowdy yeah that's probably why i think... Read more
Last night kamla harris and donald trump took to the debate stage to make their cases to tailor allison swift and whoever else happened to be watching it was not a good night for trump in terms of personal tragedies for him i'd put it somewhere between losing the 2020 election and the day fox news started... Read more
[theme music] we just witnessed a debate
between president joseph robinette biden versus
former president donald robinette trump. [laughter] it was a highly
anticipated affair, according to the network
that was running it. the first biden
trump debate a little over one month away
right here on cnn.... Read more